MMS 220 Build for "Ghost Hawk"
#23
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,446
Received 1,838 Likes
on
1,146 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Thanks for the info. I like the idea of getting all the load off the motor but not at the expense of reliability. MAF arrived. Thing is massive. About an inch more diameter than stock
#24
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,446
Received 1,838 Likes
on
1,146 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Here is the shot of the wire. Comes without a screen.
#28
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (11)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Agree 100% on that screen. I mounted mine with JB weld and a q-tip. NEVER had a problem. Mine was screened way before TSP started screening theirs. You don't need quite as dense cell count as the TSP. Next step down is fine.
http://www.hptuners.com/forum/showth...l=1#post193758
See post 24.
http://www.hptuners.com/forum/showth...l=1#post193758
See post 24.
#29
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Thanks!
Looks at this,$61 and some change for the 100mm maf sensor housing and Ac Delco ls7 maf!!
Looks at this,$61 and some change for the 100mm maf sensor housing and Ac Delco ls7 maf!!
#30
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,446
Received 1,838 Likes
on
1,146 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
cell options are like 4:1, 5:1, etc. What is needed?
#33
TECH Veteran
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![Popcorn](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/popcorn.gif)
#34
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,446
Received 1,838 Likes
on
1,146 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
My tuner specifically recommended the lingenfelter. I don't want to deal with "well if you'd have done x it would be better". This is a no excuses build. Same reason I had the lifters drilled for axle oiling.
#36
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,446
Received 1,838 Likes
on
1,146 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Same rear, etc, for now. I'll be putting a 9" in around thanksgiving time. My rear is already on borrowed time. So's the car's rear.
My tires are 26.2" diameter vs 24.7" stock. My thought was to go 3.89, which works out close to a 3.73, or just say "F" it and go 4.1 to end up at 3.89
My tires are 26.2" diameter vs 24.7" stock. My thought was to go 3.89, which works out close to a 3.73, or just say "F" it and go 4.1 to end up at 3.89
#37
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The casing around the sensor doesn't matter. It's the sensor that matters.
But you need to have a screen in there. The intake tract on the F-Body is different and more turbulent than an LS3 Vette/Camaro. So you have to straighten the flow out for the MAF to work.
And the Lingenfelter data provided is a good baseline for the transfer function in the Gen III PCM. You still have to tune the entire intake tract on the dyno. Hold the throttle steady for each cell in the MAF table for 20 secs with the wideband logging. Should take 15-20 mins total.
But you need to have a screen in there. The intake tract on the F-Body is different and more turbulent than an LS3 Vette/Camaro. So you have to straighten the flow out for the MAF to work.
And the Lingenfelter data provided is a good baseline for the transfer function in the Gen III PCM. You still have to tune the entire intake tract on the dyno. Hold the throttle steady for each cell in the MAF table for 20 secs with the wideband logging. Should take 15-20 mins total.
#39
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,446
Received 1,838 Likes
on
1,146 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The casing around the sensor doesn't matter. It's the sensor that matters.
But you need to have a screen in there. The intake tract on the F-Body is different and more turbulent than an LS3 Vette/Camaro. So you have to straighten the flow out for the MAF to work.
And the Lingenfelter data provided is a good baseline for the transfer function in the Gen III PCM. You still have to tune the entire intake tract on the dyno. Hold the throttle steady for each cell in the MAF table for 20 secs with the wideband logging. Should take 15-20 mins total.
But you need to have a screen in there. The intake tract on the F-Body is different and more turbulent than an LS3 Vette/Camaro. So you have to straighten the flow out for the MAF to work.
And the Lingenfelter data provided is a good baseline for the transfer function in the Gen III PCM. You still have to tune the entire intake tract on the dyno. Hold the throttle steady for each cell in the MAF table for 20 secs with the wideband logging. Should take 15-20 mins total.
@Scotty - The wheels are take offs from a 2012 vette. I have pictures of the car on the stock wheels, and it just looked stupid. I'm planning to get the dyno tuning done on the stock rear anyway. I can calibrate the speed sensor anytime and don't need a dyno for that.