Pushrod flex... Does it happen more than we think?
Am I going overboard for a bolt on application??
Last edited by HISS; Jul 31, 2015 at 09:07 PM.
Last edited by arock24; Jul 31, 2015 at 01:14 PM.
With valve springs and pushrods you always shoot for the safe side. As far as I’m concerned the stock spring pressures are marginal and the stock pushrods cause a lot of stability and power loss issues. To make a point on pushrod stiffness, years back doing Spintron testing on an LS1 with moderate springs there was a 400 rpm gain and an increase of 6 degrees in valve duration just by swapping a 5/16 .080 pushrod for a 3/8 .080 pushrod.
I don’t have any testing information for spring load recommendations but those loads are what is commonly used with the factory rev limit.
The issue is not the spring pressure making the rocker fail, the problem is inadequate spring pressure and pushrod flex causing lifter pump up and shock loading that causes the rocker to fail. When you use a higher ratio rocker it not only gives you more lift, it speeds up the valve and loads the pushrod more. So a higher load spring is needed and a more rigid pushrod . When customers think it’s a “bolt-on” the lifter may pump up premature (sometimes earlier than the factory redline) and parts start to break. If you do the math from a lifter pump up situation it’s lifter preload times the rocker ratio equals momentary added valve lift, ex. .050 x 1.8 = .090. It that case there would not be enough added travel in the valvetrain and there would be momentary mechanical lockup which breaks parts.
The other issue with the 1.8’s is pushrod to head clearance. With higher ratio rockers (all engines) the pushrod comes thru the head on more of an angle so the clearance will have to be checked and it is an issue with some of the LS6 heads. I don’t normally recommend purchasing 1.8’s unless the heads are coming off.
As far as the pushrods, in 5/16 diameter minimum wall thickness .110” (all LS even stock ratio) and if the heads are being removed open up the holes in the heads for 3/8” pushrods and use .080 to .120 wall.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
With valve springs and pushrods you always shoot for the safe side. As far as I’m concerned the stock spring pressures are marginal and the stock pushrods cause a lot of stability and power loss issues. To make a point on pushrod stiffness, years back doing Spintron testing on an LS1 with moderate springs there was a 400 rpm gain and an increase of 6 degrees in valve duration just by swapping a 5/16 .080 pushrod for a 3/8 .080 pushrod.
I don’t have any testing information for spring load recommendations but those loads are what is commonly used with the factory rev limit.
The issue is not the spring pressure making the rocker fail, the problem is inadequate spring pressure and pushrod flex causing lifter pump up and shock loading that causes the rocker to fail. When you use a higher ratio rocker it not only gives you more lift, it speeds up the valve and loads the pushrod more. So a higher load spring is needed and a more rigid pushrod . When customers think it’s a “bolt-on” the lifter may pump up premature (sometimes earlier than the factory redline) and parts start to break. If you do the math from a lifter pump up situation it’s lifter preload times the rocker ratio equals momentary added valve lift, ex. .050 x 1.8 = .090. It that case there would not be enough added travel in the valvetrain and there would be momentary mechanical lockup which breaks parts.
The other issue with the 1.8’s is pushrod to head clearance. With higher ratio rockers (all engines) the pushrod comes thru the head on more of an angle so the clearance will have to be checked and it is an issue with some of the LS6 heads. I don’t normally recommend purchasing 1.8’s unless the heads are coming off.
As far as the pushrods, in 5/16 diameter minimum wall thickness .110” (all LS even stock ratio) and if the heads are being removed open up the holes in the heads for 3/8” pushrods and use .080 to .120 wall.
Bigger diameter pushrods definitely have their place. I am considering going with trend dual taper on my current setup, but I have a hard time believing you need anything more then a good 5/16 for a stock cam car. I could be wrong but when I tore my car down for the H/C/I install @ 17,000miles, Everything looked brand new. Fwiw the 1.85 rocker setup was installed around 3,000mi. So roughly 14,000mi with the 1.85 setup and the cam, lifters, and pushrods( again looked brand new).
My current setup I am shifting between 68-7000rpm and it just rips up to that rpm. I am running a Manley heavy wall 5/16. I need to get it on a dyno and see what it looks like, but it feels great.
Last edited by kinglt-1; Jul 31, 2015 at 09:57 PM.
Bigger diameter pushrods definitely have their place. I am considering going with trend dual taper on my current setup, but I have a hard time believing you need anything more then a good 5/16 for a stock cam car. I could be wrong but when I tore my car down for the H/C/I install @ 17,000miles, Everything looked brand new. Fwiw the 1.85 rocker setup was installed around 3,000mi. So roughly 14,000mi with the 1.85 setup and the cam, lifters, and pushrods( again looked brand new).
My current setup I am shifting between 68-7000rpm and it just rips up to that rpm. I am running a Manley heavy wall 5/16. I need to get it on a dyno and see what it looks like, but it feels great.
Pushrod Stiffness
Pushrod Stiffness





