5/16 or 11/32 pushrods
I asked Brian about going with an 11/32 setup but I haven't heard back yet.i know push rod weight isn't important nearly as much as over the valve weight but still is it enough for to where it could overload the valve train with that setup?
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Very good read!
FWIW, Tony recommended 11/32 for mine, and his builds don't seem to have valve control issues.
You are on the short travel side of the lifter, so distance, velocity, acceleration will all be about 55% vs over the valve. Mass will be far less important.
Board member contacted me the other day. Been through everyones lifters. Thought he had a lifter issue. Had cracked pushrod seats in the engine. Thats is from valvetrain instability. 5/16" pushrods. Then come to find out he had shaft rocker with 180 radius pushrods. Engine was prone to "spit" pushrods out going down the road. No wonder....Flex plus the cup hitting the pushrod.
Hell in NASCAR they run 1/2" diameter stuff to 10,000 rpm!!!
I've never heard of anyone going less on the pushrod side to save weight but I've heard many times about going less on the valve and spring side to save weight. Everyone I know says to run the biggest stiffest pushrod possible as whatever miniscule weight savings you might get with a narrower rod will be overshadowed by it's inherent weaknesses over a beefier one.
Were talking about a bolt-on LS3 here. If BTR said 5/16 is the right push rod for the application, then I would be comfortable running it.
Even though he's running a stock cam, he is running 1.8:1 Yella Terras and BTR Platinums. So there's a lot more spring pressure than factory and weight over the valve. Will the 11/32 make it more stable? Probably not. He won't be spinning the motor high enough to see any issues with the hydraulic setup. However, there's no real downside to it other than cost.








