H/C Install and now totally confused.
#41
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Rochester, Michigan
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by slyws6
that is kinda odd because HP is a calculation of torque so thus since the increase in hp and loss in torque just wouldn't add up. I don't remember the calculation off of the top of my head but somethings not right lol.
-Sly
-Sly
#42
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Rochester, Michigan
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What a difference a different dyno makes. Went to a dyno jet today, did 4 pulls. All four the a/f is about 13.5 at wot. Got all the sheets for uncorrected, SAE and Standard. Here is the results.
SAE STD Uncorrect
HP Torque HP Torque HP Torque
Pull #1 411.1 374.5 419.1 381.8 400.5 365.00
Pull #2 415.2 376.1 423.2 366.2 404.2 366.2
Pull #3 416.2 380.3 424.0 387.4 403.7 368.8
Pull #4 412.4 379.5 419.9 386.5 399.2 367.3
Now is this good numbers?
SAE STD Uncorrect
HP Torque HP Torque HP Torque
Pull #1 411.1 374.5 419.1 381.8 400.5 365.00
Pull #2 415.2 376.1 423.2 366.2 404.2 366.2
Pull #3 416.2 380.3 424.0 387.4 403.7 368.8
Pull #4 412.4 379.5 419.9 386.5 399.2 367.3
Now is this good numbers?
#43
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Commerce, MI
Posts: 1,563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by v8maro
I say you will put down 423/365 on the dynojet, let me know.
-Steve
-Steve
Originally Posted by SS125
Pull #2 415.2 376.1 423.2 366.2 404.2 366.2
#46
Teching In
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Clovis, New Mexico
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I had a TSP 231/237 112 cam installed, but left the stock heads. I gained 38rwhp but only 4rwtq????? Better than losing torque I guess I was hoping for more torque, so maybe its time for heads! Will heads do the trick?? anybody??
Last edited by SloZ06; 06-14-2004 at 11:19 PM.
#47
TECH Junkie
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Lakeland, FL
Posts: 3,242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
those mustang dynos are quirky, I've seen a few odd dyno's down here in florida. I think there is alot more to them than that they have load and because of this subract like 10%. They must account for other variables etc.
#48
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Rochester, Michigan
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by v8maro
btw- where did you do the 4 runs and how much, send me a PM with the info if you want.
-Steve
-Steve
As for your prediction, very insightful.
#49
Dyno info scaled wrong!
https://ls1tech.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=9831
theres something odd about they dyno sheet...if you look at the two hp curves from 2600-3700 it looks like the new combo has more hp, but then if you look at the tq curves the old setup has more tq that makes no sense.
theres something odd about they dyno sheet...if you look at the two hp curves from 2600-3700 it looks like the new combo has more hp, but then if you look at the tq curves the old setup has more tq that makes no sense.
Also any time torque is gained above 5200 with a loss below, (example huge cam, retarded cam timing, etc.) you will gain HP numbers and Loose torque. Remember torque is the only one measured, HP is just calculated.
HP=T x RPM/5252.