Single beehive 9/18s

What brand/model spring is that? I suppose Ti retainers. What material are the locks? What's the spring weigh by itself? Need to get off my lazy butt and pull a BTR .660 and weigh that setup too.
The spring is Comp's "new" conical spring (7228-16) with the OEM steel retainer and locks. I haven't weighed any of the springs by themselves.
REALLY INTERESTING!!
So this article shows the weight of the 918 Beehive at 99g. Some dual(likely comp also) at 121g.
http://www.enginelabs.com/engine-tec...-work-for-you/
I weighed stock and PSI 1511(pics below).
PSI 1511: 68g
Stock LS6: 78g
Comp 918: 99g(!!)
Comp? Dual: 121g
PSI saves 10g per spring over factory and a whopping 31g over 918! That's almost 50% more. 496g over 16 springs. I think half a kilo is significant.
No wonder that heavy-*** 918 doesn't show any benefit! I may be closer than I thought on my "Kia of beehives" comment.
What do you guys think?
I think it's pretty easy to see which springs one should and should not be running at this point.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
My ECU-882C, my coils, turbo LS, Comp Valve Train, Comp "turbo" cam. (free)
The Spring broke in minutes, cam made no power BEFORE the spring cracked.
I called Carl Wegner, he stated "I have never broke a "behive" PSI 1511ML spring in ANY of the GNW engines we sell, they are required items."
The camshaft was replaced by a stock GM ZO-6 item.
The PSI-1511ML's where installed
The engine now ran fine, we made 1200+ HP@22 PSI.
Another item I will NEVER understand, why most install a TI Retainer on an exhaust valve when the weight, with a steel retainer, is still less than the intake with a Ti Retainer.
Lance
BTR dual spring: 94g
Retainer: 9g
Locks: 3g
So the BTR duals weigh less than a 918 single?! No wonder we've been eating up the marketing of duals having no disadvantage(weight/power/RPM) compared to singles.
Again, the BTR .660s are fantastic.
But with the right setup, there is likely a place for a light-weight beehive.
I have used "duals" on intake ONLY for a SC engine requirement.
This method can allow for seat pressure (high) AND low nose pressure (Hyd Lifter).
I have used "solid" Intake Lifters/Hyd Exhaust on SC cams.
I would like to ADD, the cam lift/nose pressure amount can EXCEED the ability of the stock GM lifter to maintain "0" lash as RPM increased.
Just another reason to fit a PSI 1511ML spring.
Lance









