Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

What is the max RPM for this setup?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 28, 2017 | 10:01 AM
  #1  
zhero21's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Default What is the max RPM for this setup?

SBE C5Z. On top of mods in sig, it'll now have CNC'd 243s and a ported fast 92 / ported ls2 tb. I'm trying to pick my lifters according to what RPM I need to spin to to make peak power with my setup. LS7 vs 5315 vs 2110? My tuner said I'll only need 6900 RPM, but the valve train guru doing my heads and intake mentioned 2110 and spin to the moon. So, what will be the RPM where I finish making power in my setup? 6800, 6900, 7000, 7200, 7500, ect?

Btr4 cam, btr springs and titanium retainers, btr pushrods, 1 3/4 headers, open x pipe, borla stingers, ls7 clutch, btr trunion upgrade
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2017 | 10:07 AM
  #2  
KCS's Avatar
KCS
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 8,859
Likes: 323
From: Conroe, TX
Default

Originally Posted by zhero21
SBE C5Z. On top of mods in sig, it'll now have CNC'd 243s and a ported fast 92 / ported ls2 tb. I'm trying to pick my lifters according to what RPM I need to spin to to make peak power with my setup. LS7 vs 5315 vs 2110? My tuner said I'll only need 6900 RPM, but the valve train guru doing my heads and intake mentioned 2110 and spin to the moon. So, what will be the RPM where I finish making power in my setup? 6800, 6900, 7000, 7200, 7500, ect?

Btr4 cam, btr springs and titanium retainers, btr pushrods, 1 3/4 headers, open x pipe, borla stingers, ls7 clutch, btr trunion upgrade
Go to 8500RPM. Then when your tuner and/or valve train guru say that's too much, tell them a guy on the internet said so.

Or just take the advice of the guys building your car
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2017 | 10:58 AM
  #3  
Jtm2085's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,219
Likes: 15
Default

I have the same cam and 243's. when I was running a fast 92 and 1 3/4 headers my car peaked at 6300 and I have the limiter set at 7k
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2017 | 11:51 AM
  #4  
G Atsma's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 22,288
Likes: 3,615
From: Central Cal.
Default

Originally Posted by KCS
Or just take the advice of the guys building your car
^^^^^ This X2
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2017 | 12:06 PM
  #5  
Jtm2085's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,219
Likes: 15
Default

Originally Posted by G Atsma
^^^^^ This X2
Well it seems like he is getting conflicting information. Op I would get the best the drop in morels and then look at your graph and figure out where you want to shift it
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2017 | 12:43 PM
  #6  
01ssreda4's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (96)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 24,241
Likes: 89
From: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Default

ls7s and shift between 6500-6750. I doubt you'll see gains spinning higher and that is considered a safe rpm for a SBE engine. This is where I shift with a similar combo.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2017 | 01:00 PM
  #7  
zhero21's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by KCS
Go to 8500RPM. Then when your tuner and/or valve train guru say that's too much, tell them a guy on the internet said so.

Or just take the advice of the guys building your car
well the cnc guy is said to spin to the moon with 2110s, but my tuner said I'll only need 6900. I'm currently at 6850 and make power all the way up to it, 439rwhp/401tq. I'm basically trying to justify $450 for 2110s.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2017 | 01:02 PM
  #8  
zhero21's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Default

And the cnc guy said 2110>5315>ls7 lifters
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2017 | 01:41 PM
  #9  
JakeFusion's Avatar
Super Hulk Smash
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,258
Likes: 146
From: Pace, FL
Default

The Johnsons are better. Do them anyway.

All of them work to 7500 with a light enough valvetrain.

The FAST 92 isn't going to want to go that high... and neither is that cam. There's no reason to go past 7k with that combo.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2017 | 09:21 AM
  #10  
KCS's Avatar
KCS
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 8,859
Likes: 323
From: Conroe, TX
Default

Originally Posted by zhero21
well the cnc guy is said to spin to the moon with 2110s, but my tuner said I'll only need 6900. I'm currently at 6850 and make power all the way up to it, 439rwhp/401tq. I'm basically trying to justify $450 for 2110s.
Those are nice lifters, but they aren't necessary to turn 7k.

The LS7's would work, but the 5315 lifters have a couple features that make them better, but you may not really see an advantage on the dyno. Same with the 2110's. They have features that make them better, but depending on the rest of the combo, you may not realize those advantages on the dyno.

Cathedral port heads and long runner intakes, like the FAST, aren't really known for developing power after about 6200-6500 RPM. If you're going to see any power from a different hyd. lifter, its going to be mostly at higher RPM where it would be more stable than a lesser hyd. lifter. With the engine combo you described so far, it doesn't really sound like they'll be worth the money IMO.

My point earlier was that the guys building your car should have a good idea of how these lifters will work considering the total package. Obviously "to the moon" isn't a real answer, so I would lean on the expertise of the guys with the more technical answers.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2017 | 10:09 AM
  #11  
zhero21's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by KCS
Those are nice lifters, but they aren't necessary to turn 7k.

The LS7's would work, but the 5315 lifters have a couple features that make them better, but you may not really see an advantage on the dyno. Same with the 2110's. They have features that make them better, but depending on the rest of the combo, you may not realize those advantages on the dyno.

Cathedral port heads and long runner intakes, like the FAST, aren't really known for developing power after about 6200-6500 RPM. If you're going to see any power from a different hyd. lifter, its going to be mostly at higher RPM where it would be more stable than a lesser hyd. lifter. With the engine combo you described so far, it doesn't really sound like they'll be worth the money IMO.

My point earlier was that the guys building your car should have a good idea of how these lifters will work considering the total package. Obviously "to the moon" isn't a real answer, so I would lean on the expertise of the guys with the more technical answers.
thanks for the advice. The builders aunt giving me toooo much info because they are just porting and cnc'ing, I do all of the labor to my car. Ls7s sound like a proven choice for me with my mild setup and it sounds like it'll save me money to start beefing up drivetrain
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2017 | 10:20 AM
  #12  
redtan's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,764
Likes: 17
From: Belmont, MA
Default

No matter what you choose for top end, your limiting factor will be the stock bottom end. I wouldn't be spinning those past 7k anyway, so that's kind of where you should keep it at.
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:23 AM.