Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Cam for 5400lb truck

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-14-2017, 04:20 PM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
Bspeck82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,724
Received 412 Likes on 299 Posts
Default Cam for 5400lb truck

Looking to tear into a 5.3 in a truck that weights more than a couple tons. Just looking to add some character to it, wake it up. While retaining the ability to haul around our real muscle cars. It will be accompanied by stock 799s heads, longtubes and full exhaust with a stall converter. The usual basics. Any recommendations on a cam? I need as much torque as possible from around idle on up. Dont care what it revs too. Dont care how it sounds.
Old 09-14-2017, 04:23 PM
  #2  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (40)
 
00pooterSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Dallas
Posts: 4,916
Received 523 Likes on 372 Posts

Default

Check out the drop in truck cams. They are built for what you're looking for and retain stock pushrods and valve springs.

If you're handy pull the heads (unless you mean they'll already be off) and mill them a little too for a little more low end, efficiency, torque, power etc and to get back some of the dynamic compression you'll lose with the cam.
Old 09-14-2017, 04:40 PM
  #3  
Staging Lane
 
Dragls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Bspeck82
Dont care how it sounds.

How dare you say that on LS1tech!
Old 09-14-2017, 05:00 PM
  #4  
TECH Resident
 
slogo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 985
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

http://sdparts.com/i-22100614-sdpc-s...0-525-115.html
don't know if scoggin and dickey are vendors or not. if not google sd0053
Old 09-14-2017, 05:19 PM
  #5  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
BudRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Dunwoody, GA
Posts: 3,544
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

What stall converter are you going with?
Old 09-14-2017, 06:59 PM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (16)
 
1FastBrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: JunkYard
Posts: 9,273
Received 412 Likes on 293 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by slogo
http://sdparts.com/i-22100614-sdpc-s...0-525-115.html
don't know if scoggin and dickey are vendors or not. if not google sd0053
FYI, Yes SDPC is a sponsor on this board.
Old 09-14-2017, 07:05 PM
  #7  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (40)
 
00pooterSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Dallas
Posts: 4,916
Received 523 Likes on 372 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by slogo
http://sdparts.com/i-22100614-sdpc-s...0-525-115.html
don't know if scoggin and dickey are vendors or not. if not google sd0053
Good one. Requires LS6 springs and last time I looked them up at scoggin dickey they were only about $70
Old 09-14-2017, 08:21 PM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 20,868
Received 3,019 Likes on 2,350 Posts
Default

I would go a bit stouter than LS6 springs, like a PAC 1218 (I THINK that's it..) . Call it life insurance for your valvetrain...
Old 09-15-2017, 10:28 AM
  #9  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
BudRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Dunwoody, GA
Posts: 3,544
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

LS6 springs are perfectly fine for a NA engine with mild lift under .59X". Their lower seat pressure will be better for noise and valvetrain wear.
Old 09-15-2017, 11:57 AM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
Bspeck82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,724
Received 412 Likes on 299 Posts
Default

The entire valvetrain minus rockers will be changed. I will run high lift springs, probably duals. As for the converter it will be a circle D budget truck converter.
Old 09-15-2017, 01:14 PM
  #11  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (40)
 
00pooterSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Dallas
Posts: 4,916
Received 523 Likes on 372 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Bspeck82
The entire valvetrain minus rockers will be changed. I will run high lift springs, probably duals. As for the converter it will be a circle D budget truck converter.
Dual springs/high pressure springs is just more parasitic drain and more wear and tear if they aren't necessary. That's not really an area where overkill is better.
Old 09-15-2017, 03:11 PM
  #12  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 20,868
Received 3,019 Likes on 2,350 Posts
Default

I was under the (possibly mistaken) impression that LS6 springs were only good for .550 or slightly above, but not approaching .600.
Old 09-15-2017, 03:39 PM
  #13  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
BudRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Dunwoody, GA
Posts: 3,544
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

The LS6 cam itself is 0.551" / 0.547" int/exh lift. There is some headroom there, but as it is .55X" of lift is plenty given proper duration. The reported cases I've seen were all for lift above .6XX". For the intended purpose of this truck cam, there is no need for lift above .6XX".
Old 09-15-2017, 04:08 PM
  #14  
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
Darth_V8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,446
Received 1,835 Likes on 1,145 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bspeck82
Looking to tear into a 5.3 in a truck that weights more than a couple tons. Just looking to add some character to it, wake it up. While retaining the ability to haul around our real muscle cars. It will be accompanied by stock 799s heads, longtubes and full exhaust with a stall converter. The usual basics. Any recommendations on a cam? I need as much torque as possible from around idle on up. Dont care what it revs too. Dont care how it sounds.
Your best play might actually be some rockers. Put a set of 1.85's or such on there to gain the lift and cylinder pressure. That would give it some more pop ont he exhaust note without sacrificing any off idle torques. Less invasive, too
Old 09-15-2017, 05:37 PM
  #15  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (40)
 
00pooterSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Dallas
Posts: 4,916
Received 523 Likes on 372 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by G Atsma
I was under the (possibly mistaken) impression that LS6 springs were only good for .550 or slightly above, but not approaching .600.
You are correct, thing is the "truck" cams range from around .500-.55x IIRC, with most being under .550

Originally Posted by BudRacing
The LS6 cam itself is 0.551" / 0.547" int/exh lift. There is some headroom there, but as it is .55X" of lift is plenty given proper duration. The reported cases I've seen were all for lift above .6XX". For the intended purpose of this truck cam, there is no need for lift above .6XX".
Agreed

Originally Posted by Darth_V8r
Your best play might actually be some rockers. Put a set of 1.85's or such on there to gain the lift and cylinder pressure. That would give it some more pop ont he exhaust note without sacrificing any off idle torques. Less invasive, too
I never considered rockers only, have you seen any literature with results from rockers only I could read on? Or know someone that's tried it? Curious how they liked it, especially if they did it on a truck.
Old 09-15-2017, 06:01 PM
  #16  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 20,868
Received 3,019 Likes on 2,350 Posts
Default

One other thing I forgot to mention was that LS6 springs were a bit "soft" for the application, with the result that some knowledgeable people don't even like them much in their intended application. BUT this might just be "internet rhetoric"....
Old 09-15-2017, 07:15 PM
  #17  
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
Darth_V8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,446
Received 1,835 Likes on 1,145 Posts
Default

Most of the rockers only stuff I've seen was all tq gains. Like 8/18 hp/tq. Trucks like high idle vacuum for good off idle torque. A simple rocker upgrade won't affect that. Might even improve it
Old 09-16-2017, 04:17 PM
  #18  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
BudRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Dunwoody, GA
Posts: 3,544
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by G Atsma
One other thing I forgot to mention was that LS6 springs were a bit "soft" for the application, with the result that some knowledgeable people don't even like them much in their intended application. BUT this might just be "internet rhetoric"....
If you spend a lot of time above 5k rpm, then that's fair to say. Most street cars don't see this kind of use, especially trucks. The LS6 valvetrain was designed for spirited street use with track capabilities. There is some trade-off to be said about springs that are too snappy on an already noisy LS valvetrain, including extra stress on lifters. The latest LS6 springs, IMO, provide a happy medium of driveability and performance with little compromise. For racing applications, a custom valvetrain is prescribed.
Old 09-16-2017, 06:13 PM
  #19  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 20,868
Received 3,019 Likes on 2,350 Posts
Default

OK, thanks for clarifying!
Old 09-17-2017, 09:38 AM
  #20  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
Bspeck82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,724
Received 412 Likes on 299 Posts
Default

What lobes are recommended for heavy truck applications with torque and durability in mind?


Quick Reply: Cam for 5400lb truck



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:34 PM.