Question on head bolts or studs
Those then state my "tech" in not understood without asking for a better explanation.
THEN they belittle us for trying to sell the answer, a quality product, and a lower cost product in most cases.
The ARP studs, when fitted, I MUST machine BEFORE use REQUIRED to make then "true".
Racing Engines/Racing Cars use studs in must cases.
This is required due to the repeated assembly/tear down that would damage the bolt hole threads in lite metals.
These fasteners are "trash caned" after being used (run) for a period of time, a hours of operation based record is kept.
I would like to add tech learned from NorthStar GM SC engine assemble.
The Head Gasket is similar to the LS-9 in the fact that it too seems to compress over time/heat cycles.
I used studs (ARP) with the torque sequence required repeated every four hours until the end of day.
Each time they were very loose.
I decided to "wrap" the complete engine with one of my tire blankets and let it sit (cook) over night.
The next day I let the engine cool, then did the "last" tightening, my hope.
I was correct with my guess.
Many machine shops "boil" the engine block before align bore/hone, etc.
The home assembly of an engine could use a similar method of a simple Electric Blanket "wrapped" engine to cause one heat cycle/warm the block/heads.
Would this be some new tech ?
Lance
However the cheap eBay studs have been known to bust when over torqued. I would stay away from them, but new oem bolts or arp stuts\bolts will be fine.
Last edited by Paul Bell; Oct 31, 2017 at 08:28 PM.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
They, the members, are here to learn.
My GUESS is that even if you ask a question to a "first poster" , he could answer this question: When a bolt/stud is installed AND "over-torqued" tightened in a way to damage this part, installation instructions not followed, who is at FAULT ?
NOW the good question by Stampede : The LS engine is assembled by Robots on a production line with equipment that requires calibration. That calibration frequency was found much lower, less repeat calibration required, when the torque-to-yeald fasteners were engineered for use in the modern engine. This engine is built to last the lifetime of cars federally required emission warranty, not much longer and not to be rebuilt.
The method used to tighten Rod Bolts is a "stretch" method with measurement of bolt length when tight.
When the bolt length specification is measured to be longer (when free), the bolt is trashed.
The use of fasteners in an engine/head made of Aluminum is much different than an Iron engine with different engineering required to MATCH the growth of the Aluminum.
Thus my "reuse" = NO
Measure your used head bolts AND give us that report ?
This above tech is NIST certified.
Lance
Couple of years ago I built a 667 rwhp (through a 3600 stall) 406 for a friend/customer with ARP head bolts, it did absolutely fine with them. Probably would have done fine with the OEM bolts too. It wasn't my choice to use them, I would have preferred ARP studs, but he strictly wanted me to use what he gave me to use. They were used too btw, not new.
Last edited by 00pooterSS; Nov 1, 2017 at 10:14 AM.
NOW, my "tech" for the torquing method is as yours/GM with a LAST STEP #4 added.
That step is to "re-torque" the FIRST TWO center studs (1&2 middle) to 75+, just breaking sheer.
I find these two center studs at a lower value when this is done every time and know they should be brought back to 75.
I have a Hardinge Lath and use Collets to re-machine ARP Studs when fitted.
I have found about 20% as OUT of ROUND !
GOOD REPORT
Lance










