Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Replacing DART225 heads worth it?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-26-2017, 09:56 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
10secondTVR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Birmingham England
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Replacing DART225 heads worth it?

Hi Guys,
I have been on here before but my email has collapsed, no idea what my passwords are etc...
I have a TVR Cerbera (2600lbs) with a 416CI LS3 base, fully forged on Kinsler ITB's, but i am on DART 225 heads which i have opened the combustion Chamber up to match the 4.065 bore, plus a porting job and 5 angle valves, however these are the Standard 2.02/1.6 sizes.
I want to stay with Cathedral ports because i want to keep the ITB's.
Would i see gains if i went for Trickflow 245's for instance?
I am running a 244/256 cam, i would like to go a little milder on the cam as we pay 3 times what you do on gas!
It will run a 10.63/132 at the moment, 202mph verified top speed.
What are the considered cathedral heads these days???
Ive attached a pic of the car so you get the idea!
Attached Thumbnails Replacing DART225 heads worth it?-img_e4432.jpg  
Old 10-26-2017, 11:30 AM
  #2  
TECH Veteran
 
Tuskyz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 4,808
Received 599 Likes on 413 Posts
Default

Brian Tooley hand finished Trickflow 245s. They seem to be getting faster and faster.....
Old 10-26-2017, 01:57 PM
  #3  
LS1Tech Sponsor
 
TrickFlowTech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Outstanding Machine!
__________________
http://www.trickflow.com/emain.asp
Click Above for Product Information
Old 10-30-2017, 04:52 AM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
10secondTVR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Birmingham England
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

But would i see any benefits!!??
Old 10-30-2017, 07:30 AM
  #5  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (18)
 
LS1MCSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Dover, Arkansas
Posts: 3,831
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

You would probably see a small benefit from the better heads but if you go smaller cam you will cancel out the head swap, in my opinion.
Old 10-30-2017, 05:14 PM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
 
NAVYBLUE210's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Coast of San Mateo County Between Pacifica & HMB
Posts: 1,825
Received 230 Likes on 136 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

Tony MamoMotorsport (MMS) 235s with NFI (Nitrous/Forced Induction)
Exhaust Port. With something like 239*/243* ~.650"/.630" ~114*+3*
For Cam Specs. Better Performance, Better driveability (smoother), little better economyWhen cruising,
tough to get better performance & economy from the same
CID & performance, but it is possible with Better Heads which allow
A more Optimized (smaller duration & smaller exhaust split) Cam.

Money no object LLSR Cam from Cam Motion slightly less duration
But more lift, 241*/245* (subtract ~6* for Lash & HR Equivalency,
~= 235/239) .690"/.670", make up the power with increased lift
& + 1000 RPM.

Last edited by NAVYBLUE210; 10-30-2017 at 05:22 PM.
Old 10-30-2017, 05:28 PM
  #7  
10 Second Club
 
big hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: over dere
Posts: 3,427
Received 171 Likes on 120 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

Might as well go for good stuff. Mast 245 cathedrals. Flow 372 on a 4.065 bore plate. Gonna have a hard time beating that. Watch the flow Numbers there's a handful of companies that advertise flow numbers with a 4.125 or larger bore plate to make the heads look better than they are

https://www.mastmotorsports.com/products/ls1-245

Last edited by big hammer; 10-30-2017 at 05:36 PM.
Old 10-30-2017, 10:07 PM
  #8  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (2)
 
wannafbody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 4,798
Received 864 Likes on 660 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

Mast has some awesome stuff.
Old 10-31-2017, 08:18 AM
  #9  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
10secondTVR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Birmingham England
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sooo...
Tooley touched Trickflow or Mast?
I will have to match my ITB's to the Inlet port, but thats no biggie.
Old 10-31-2017, 08:31 AM
  #10  
TECH Veteran
 
Tuskyz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 4,808
Received 599 Likes on 413 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 10secondTVR
Sooo...
Tooley touched Trickflow or Mast?
I will have to match my ITB's to the Inlet port, but thats no biggie.
Mast is a great head period. Expect to spend north of 4 grand on the Mast heads with all the gadgets. I just see more Tooley hand finished TFS 245s on motors because they're cheaper but it's plenty of guys running 4s in the 1/8 mile mile with Tooley heads and his customer service is top notch. Therefore I vote TFS
Old 10-31-2017, 08:47 AM
  #11  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
10secondTVR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Birmingham England
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My 256 exhaust lobe is low a .596, but i only have 1"3/4 headers i am limited on space.
Old 10-31-2017, 05:58 PM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
 
NAVYBLUE210's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Coast of San Mateo County Between Pacifica & HMB
Posts: 1,825
Received 230 Likes on 136 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

Originally Posted by Tuskyz28
Mast is a great head period. Expect to spend north of 4 grand on the Mast heads with all the gadgets. I just see more Tooley hand finished TFS 245s on motors because they're cheaper but it's plenty of guys running 4s in the 1/8 mile mile with Tooley heads and his customer service is top notch. Therefore I vote TFS
Voting twice,
You must be special.
Old 10-31-2017, 08:25 PM
  #13  
TECH Apprentice
 
Fishmasterdan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 310
Received 24 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

General rule of thumb 2 cfm is 1 HP. Compare your cfm gain and see if it's worth it for your budget.
Old 10-31-2017, 10:15 PM
  #14  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (2)
 
wannafbody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 4,798
Received 864 Likes on 660 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

Originally Posted by Fishmasterdan
General rule of thumb 2 cfm is 1 HP. Compare your cfm gain and see if it's worth it for your budget.
Explain how you figure that... lets say 300 cfm intake times 8 cylinders is 2400 divided by 2 is 1200 HP. That doesn't seem correct to me.
Old 10-31-2017, 10:26 PM
  #15  
TECH Fanatic
 
NAVYBLUE210's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Coast of San Mateo County Between Pacifica & HMB
Posts: 1,825
Received 230 Likes on 136 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

Closer to 2 HP (crankshaft) per 1 CFM.
300 CFM enough for 600 HP.
Gasoline potential could be as high as 2.2 HP per 1 CFM with
Optimal utilization (compression, rpm, cam timing and on and on)
Old 10-31-2017, 10:38 PM
  #16  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 21,439
Received 3,240 Likes on 2,525 Posts
Default

I have a feeling that 2cfm per cylinder head flow is worth 1HP on the whole engine.
Example: The difference between a stock 243 head port and one with a Stage I TSP CNC port job is 53cfm PER PORT at .600 lift. That would equate to about 26 HP gain on that port job, with no other changes, on the WHOLE engine. TOTALLY makes sense.
Let's not overthink this...
Old 10-31-2017, 11:12 PM
  #17  
10 Second Club
 
big hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: over dere
Posts: 3,427
Received 171 Likes on 120 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

It's one port runner CFM X 2.2 = max potential output. Not every port combined. Also that's not the actual peak that's the theoretical max output NA.
Old 10-31-2017, 11:22 PM
  #18  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 21,439
Received 3,240 Likes on 2,525 Posts
Default

Well that is the opposite of the way I put it, but your way makes sense once I did the math on a hypothetical case.
Thanks Hammer!
Old 11-01-2017, 12:11 AM
  #19  
TECH Veteran
 
Tuskyz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 4,808
Received 599 Likes on 413 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NAVYBLUE210
Voting twice,
You must be special.
Yes I am a pretty special guy. If you ever visit Mast website and build you a set of heads using all the top notch components you'll see a MAJOR price difference between mast heads vs TFS done by Tooley. It's not hard to tie 4500 dollars into a set of mast heads Dan. And you always talking about Tony customer service is A1. I know that about Tony.. hard worker that barely sleeps but Tooley customer service is A1 as well and he even calls to make sure you get all your parts etc on time and all.

What I do know for a FACT about heads/porters?

I know every time I've visited LS fest I've seen a Trickflow 245 heads on different applications outperformed some heads that cost more money than TFS heads. Ask James Short who is one of the most respected tuners in the United States period what heads makes the most power on his stingy *** dyno and see what the answer be. He have dynoed EVERY LS head you can think of. And yet he is no salesman eithier.
Old 11-01-2017, 07:19 AM
  #20  
TECH Fanatic
 
NAVYBLUE210's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Coast of San Mateo County Between Pacifica & HMB
Posts: 1,825
Received 230 Likes on 136 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

Originally Posted by big hammer
It's one port runner CFM X 2.2 = max potential output. Not every port combined. Also that's not the actual peak that's the theoretical max output NA.
Correct & stated better!
Thank you.


Quick Reply: Replacing DART225 heads worth it?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:20 AM.