Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Lq4 shortblock need help with head selection

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 29, 2018 | 06:49 PM
  #1  
69greyghost's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Default Lq4 shortblock need help with head selection

Hey guys, I wanna do a carbed ls swap in my 71 4door impala. I wanna go carbed top end but I have questions on the head selection. I have a set of 317 heads that probably need a valve job, in any event they need to be tested. Rather than pay 300 for a valve job I found a set of LS3 Heads that are refurbished and ready to run. What all will it take to run them and how will the lq4 perform with these heads? Is it worth paying 800 for some ready to run LS3 Heads or should I just use the 317 heads? Are there any dangers to running LS3 Heads? Please let me know any experiences you guys have. This is a cruiser, so performance is not the main priority. Thanks in advance guys!
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2018 | 09:22 PM
  #2  
69greyghost's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Default

Here we go. Internet peeps that are to good to help others with less knowledge. ��
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2018 | 09:24 PM
  #3  
G Atsma's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 22,288
Likes: 3,615
From: Central Cal.
Default

Gotta give it a little more time. The head gurus (good pun right there... lol) will come around soon....
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2018 | 09:27 PM
  #4  
69greyghost's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by G Atsma
Gotta give it a little more time. The head gurus (good pun right there... lol) will come around soon....



i got u man. I just hate that 63 peeps viewed it and nobody responded. I know how the internet can be. I just hope someone can offer solid advice.
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2018 | 09:28 PM
  #5  
383z's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 618
Likes: 57
From: Houston/Clear Lake, TX.
Default

LS3 heads are great heads, but personally I don't know what intake you can run going carb. I'm sure someone will chime in.
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2018 | 09:30 PM
  #6  
G Atsma's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 22,288
Likes: 3,615
From: Central Cal.
Default

Those 63 are likely like me. Cool stuff, but I'm not the one to answer this. Gotta give some of us credit! WE don't wanna BS you! lol Someone more qualified than us will be along soon enough....
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2018 | 09:33 PM
  #7  
69greyghost's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Default

I know you guys are right. I think this carb and kit would work. I can have the harness swapped since my motor is 24 reluctor.

https://www.skspeed.com/ls3-l92-l76-...-msd-6014-box/
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2018 | 11:19 PM
  #8  
pdxmotorhead's Avatar
TECH Addict
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 2,513
Likes: 480
From: PDX-OR-USA
Default

https://www.hotrod.com/articles/ls3-...take-shootout/

Rectangle port ,, there are a few choices for manifolds

Your also really only asking a small percentage of the LS engine population,
the number of carb vs efi engines is way towards the EFI side. (Just talking percentages,, don't care which one you run)
Especially on pure street cars, so the number of guys that play is small.

I just helped build a old school Model T roadster with a 327 and a Holley, we switched to a
Edelbrock to get it to handle E10 standard fuel. Just could not get the Holley to run tight at low
RPM's and this car will see a lot of cruise nights and parades so low speed had to be dialed.
And it had to fit under the stock hood. After all the dinking around a self contained unit would
have cost less and we would still have the carb look.

Good luck and keep us updated its always good to see stuff that isnt a track queen..
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2018 | 11:33 PM
  #9  
69greyghost's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by G Atsma
Gotta give it a little more time. The head gurus (good pun right there... lol) will come around soon....
Originally Posted by pdxmotorhead
https://www.hotrod.com/articles/ls3-...take-shootout/

Rectangle port ,, there are a few choices for manifolds

Your also really only asking a small percentage of the LS engine population,
the number of carb vs efi engines is way towards the EFI side. (Just talking percentages,, don't care which one you run)
Especially on pure street cars, so the number of guys that play is small.

I just helped build a old school Model T roadster with a 327 and a Holley, we switched to a
Edelbrock to get it to handle E10 standard fuel. Just could not get the Holley to run tight at low
RPM's and this car will see a lot of cruise nights and parades so low speed had to be dialed.
And it had to fit under the stock hood. After all the dinking around a self contained unit would
have cost less and we would still have the carb look.

Good luck and keep us updated its always good to see stuff that isnt a track queen..




i looked looked at the article, I guess my question is more related to should I use LS3 Heads or 317s and if I run the LS3 Heads is it as simple as a bolt on. That’s really what I wanna know. Not what intake, I’m goin carbed intake regardless.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2018 | 12:26 AM
  #10  
pdxmotorhead's Avatar
TECH Addict
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 2,513
Likes: 480
From: PDX-OR-USA
Default

There is no such thing as bolt on.. Delete it from your vocabulary.. <joke>

I didn't see where you said what block and cam your using and that has
as much to do with your choice as anything..
There are tons of head discussions on here,, and I'd guess you need to
do some more searching to match the question
to the performance your actually expecting..

Your going to have to do some deep
research on the head questions,You will need to check every measurement
in the top end, there is no simple head X will fit with no issues answer.
To tell if LS3 heads are the right move you'll need the spec on , Block,
crank, pistons, cam, pushrods, valves, rockers, springs, retainers.

Then the operating spec, Auto/Stick, if auto what converter, what RPM
you want to peak out at. You mentioned not needing performance but I
doubt you want to spend the money and not get at lest the best decent
bang for the buck$... If the performance is not that big a deal,
why bother with LS3 heads? its 300 tops vs 800 to start..
So I'm lost a bit on the decision your struggling with there..
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2018 | 01:23 AM
  #11  
tech@WS6store's Avatar
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 4,670
Likes: 250
Default

Use either head. a 6.0 it won't really make alot of difference save for the smaller chamber on rect port heads. The small bore will work for either head BUT wont shroud the 317 heads as much.
Most people still like the cathedral port for sub 4.065 bore.

We have the perfect cam that will fit either with a carb intake on our high lift asa cam.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2018 | 05:10 AM
  #12  
NCDEERE's Avatar
Launching!
5 Year Member
Photoriffic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 236
Likes: 55
From: Chocowinity NC
Default

243 or 799 Heads will pick up your compression and still use all of your factory stuff.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2018 | 06:24 AM
  #13  
matts01z71's Avatar
Teching In
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 40
Likes: 4
From: Central Ohio
Default

The kit you show has a basic operating range starting at 3500 rpm, heads are more $, intake is more $. We know 317 heads work on block, kit range starts at 1500 rpm, is $200 less, and heads are $500 less. For me, I would do 317 and have $700 for other goodies. Good luck with build.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2018 | 09:06 PM
  #14  
69greyghost's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Default

So I ended up going with 253 heads and an ls3 stick cam in it. Should I go with a bigger cam in the lq4 or would this set up I have work?? I’m thinking about getting an ls6 intake and probably be going fuel injected now.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2018 | 09:32 PM
  #15  
tech@WS6store's Avatar
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 4,670
Likes: 250
Default

Honestly youre wasting a bunch of money in the wrong direction. Second youll need about $100 more in parts to make that ls3 cam work in a gen3 block.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2018 | 09:37 PM
  #16  
69greyghost's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by tech@WS6store
Honestly youre wasting a bunch of money in the wrong direction. Second youll need about $100 more in parts to make that ls3 cam work in a gen3 block.


What would you suggest? I can just get a regular gen 3 cam but I don’t wanna change my torque converter.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2018 | 09:39 PM
  #17  
G Atsma's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 22,288
Likes: 3,615
From: Central Cal.
Default

The LS3 cam does not have provision for the rear cam sensor. There are plenty of aftermarket Gen III cams that can do a better job
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2018 | 09:44 PM
  #18  
tech@WS6store's Avatar
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 4,670
Likes: 250
Default

Originally Posted by 69greyghost
What would you suggest? I can just get a regular gen 3 cam but I don’t wanna change my torque converter.
There are ALOT of options that work with factory converters.

You got rect port heads?
What are you goals and plans for the build?
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2018 | 10:03 PM
  #19  
69greyghost's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by tech@WS6store
There are ALOT of options that work with factory converters.

You got rect port heads?
What are you goals and plans for the build?



i just have a set of 253 stock heads that have had a valve job. I really just want around 400 hp. And the best possible gas mileage possible and have it be reliable. Those are my goals. I was told that with those heads on an lq4 would bump up the conpression and get more power. Let me know what you guys think.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2018 | 03:17 AM
  #20  
tech@WS6store's Avatar
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 4,670
Likes: 250
Default

Maybe you mean 853 because 253 is not an ls casting. They will bump up compression but are a very poor head to work with.

Milling your 317s .030 would be a better option.

Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:32 AM.