ANOTHER Cam Selection Thread
I bought an LQ4 a little while back, fairly complete, but knowing from the previous owner that there was a knocking sound and no oil pressure upon initial fire-up in his truck. (Long story short: he bought this engine as a replacement for his original [blown up] engine, and this one had its own set of problems. He wound up getting yet another engine, and this one sat in his garage for a year, which is where I come in.)
I finally got around to tearing it down, and found the source of the knocking sound, and a probable source of the lack of oil pressure: the number 1 and 2 rod bearings were spun and wasted, and that rod journal is scored up pretty badly; one of the cam bearings spun as well, and there are metal shavings throughout the engine block, so it looks like it was run with no oil, or very little. The oil pump is clean inside, and shows little to no wear. I’m pretty sure the crank can be saved, but the cam is wasted. That’s the worst of it. This was a 90,000 mile engine.
The upside of it all is that the cylinder walls still look good, and likely could be cleaned up with a hone. Also, the heads, pistons, rockers, valves, lifters, and pushrods all appear to be in good shape. The crank spins freely. So crank grinding, rod resizing, new bearings, rings, hone, ARP stuff and gaskets, and I’m good.
Except for cam selection. I’m planning to either supercharge or turbocharge this engine eventually, so I’m wondering how the LS9 cam will run N/A with 317 heads, the truck intake and cheap shorty headers until I decide (can afford) to boost it. I plan to keep the 317 heads, BTW, and I’d like to keep them stock except for springs. I understand about LS2/cam sensor stuff. Or should I get another cam to run in the meantime, that is more suitable for basic DD service until later.
The car is a 1970 Chevelle. Transmission will be a 4L80E, and it already has a 9 inch rear with 31 spline axles and 3.89 gears. Horsepower goals are modest: 450-500 RWHP. If this was a little long, I apologize. I’m trying to make sure that all pertinent information is included. Thanks in advance for any and all advice.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
True, the LS9 cam does use the front cam sensor, but that can still be used with the 24x reluctor.
I'm guessing the engine will be coming apart to fix the other issues. So I'd strongly consider 58x.
I recall seeing Pantera EFI mention NA the more accurate timing with 58x could allow for up to half a point more compression. He was key player involved with development of the 58x system. If I recall correctly 24x in a running engine can have the timing vary by 1-2 degrees. The 58x variance is about half of a degree.
The more accurate 58x timing would in theory allow for more hp due to more precise tuning. Given that LSA superchargers are used factory with the 58x set up also helps sway me toward favoring the 58x set up.
If think 58x has the edge if it's not too much hassle to use the matching electronic gas pedal & drive by wire throttle body.
FWIW - that's my .02
That’s an interesting point regarding the LSA engines being equipped with the 58x reluctor, and one I hadn’t considered. Thanks for that.
Interestingly, my LQ4 came with the DBW throttle body, which was just another selling point for that particular engine as far as I was concerned. My Harley has TBW, and I love it.
Its definitely going tk be supercharged, not turbocharged. I got a used LSA supercharger off eBay today, along with a ZL1 lid. I’d post photos, but y’all know what that stuff looks like.
Last edited by AtomiCapricorn; Oct 25, 2018 at 07:16 PM.






