6.0 with 5.3 crank ???
#21
Launching!
Thread Starter
OmC8 I am starting the build soon. where I live ( north east ) By now my car is put away usually, but so far this year its been very mild. So I been still driving her I love to drive this car so much it's like an addiction. It is a go-cart on steroids. she weighs about 2300-2400 lbs and with the cammed 4.8 i'm at 300 or more hp.But next couple weeks for sure the motor will be out. Have an awesome christmas everyone!!!!!!!
#22
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
OmC8 I am starting the build soon. where I live ( north east ) By now my car is put away usually, but so far this year its been very mild. So I been still driving her I love to drive this car so much it's like an addiction. It is a go-cart on steroids. she weighs about 2300-2400 lbs and with the cammed 4.8 i'm at 300 or more hp.But next couple weeks for sure the motor will be out. Have an awesome christmas everyone!!!!!!!
#23
TECH Senior Member
Gen IV 5.3 aluminum block engines are LH6, LH8, LH9, and LC9 if you can use a Gen IV, I believe they all have 243/799 heads on them.
#24
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
Yes I prefer the gen4 ,. and all those will give a 9.9 cr except the LH9 . But Op has two gen3 engine to start with. If he is fi , he needs to make changes to the harness to run gen4 block. My guess he's carb so no problem then. These gen 4 command more money .I have found complete LM4 for $300
#25
TECH Senior Member
#27
Launching!
Thread Starter
At first I thought it was going to be really heavy over the wheels. So I put the engine as far back as i could. Then some one from the mg web site I am a member of weighed the orginal mg motor, rad, and tranny. I forgot the exact weight but they then took a 5.3 iron block with a turbo 350 and the orginal mg set up was 60-70 lbs lighter. and I have a alum rad. so there is such a minimal weight difference you dont notice it . Makes for a fun fun car. I had to put an auto in it because of 4 lower back operations and a weak left leg i would rather not shift.
#28
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
At first I thought it was going to be really heavy over the wheels. So I put the engine as far back as i could. Then some one from the mg web site I am a member of weighed the orginal mg motor, rad, and tranny. I forgot the exact weight but they then took a 5.3 iron block with a turbo 350 and the orginal mg set up was 60-70 lbs lighter. and I have a alum rad. so there is such a minimal weight difference you dont notice it . Makes for a fun fun car. I had to put an auto in it because of 4 lower back operations and a weak left leg i would rather not shift.
#29
TECH Senior Member
Yeah, you would think those "little 4-bangers" would be flyweight engines, but being cast iron blocks AND heads, plus not being modern thin-wall castings, they are BOAT ANCHORS comparatively! It does not surprise me that an aluminum block LS would lighten the front end of one of those cars.
#30
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,446
Received 1,837 Likes
on
1,145 Posts
LOL!! My college roomate had a triumph spitfire. Similar story. His friend had parked the car all douchy and kept the keys, so the two of us just picked up the *** and put it in the parking spot.
#33
Let us know how it goes. I built a 5.0L MGB 18yrs ago. I was one of 1st to do that swap, and it was a PITA. With Iron block and Alum heads and a T5 I was within 50# of stock weight up front. Car weighed 2430 with tank of gas and a toolbox in the trunk. Very fun car though when I had it done! Rear axle didn't last long though. The LS is even lighter, so your car should handle very well if you go Alum block!
#34
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
Let us know how it goes. I built a 5.0L MGB 18yrs ago. I was one of 1st to do that swap, and it was a PITA. With Iron block and Alum heads and a T5 I was within 50# of stock weight up front. Car weighed 2430 with tank of gas and a toolbox in the trunk. Very fun car though when I had it done! Rear axle didn't last long though. The LS is even lighter, so your car should handle very well if you go Alum block!
#35
Right now I am gaining parts (and here researching) to put and LS in a 944.
#37
Your just Rude
#38
TECH Enthusiast
For being a Senior Tech ur really a Dumb*ss! For your information the Length of a 5.3L rod and a 6.0L rod are different therefore creating higher or lower compression! Wow I mean any Dumb*ss can Google that n see the different lengths! So don't talk Sh*t about other people when u Clearly aren't as smart as u think!!
They have the same rod length.
The only reason I'm posting this is in case someone takes your bad advice.
The following users liked this post:
G Atsma (04-26-2024)
#39
TECH Senior Member
For being a Senior Tech you're really a Dumb*ss! For your information the Length of a 5.3L rod and a 6.0L rod are different therefore creating higher or lower compression! Wow I mean any Dumb*ss can Google that n see the different lengths! So don't talk Sh*t about other people when u Clearly aren't as smart as u think!!
But NOOOOO... You go off half-cocked on me to make your "point" before you know WTF is going on. And THEN you put your own ERRONEOUS info up to show us up!! SMH....
BTW, if you wanna keep this **** up, let's see how fast a mod can kick your sorry *** outta here.....
The following 2 users liked this post by G Atsma:
dixiebandit69 (04-26-2024), strutaeng (04-27-2024)
#40
ModSquad
iTrader: (6)
For being a Senior Tech ur really a Dumb*ss! For your information the Length of a 5.3L rod and a 6.0L rod are different therefore creating higher or lower compression! Wow I mean any Dumb*ss can Google that n see the different lengths! So don't talk Sh*t about other people when u Clearly aren't as smart as u think!!