another LS1 vs LS7 lifter q
#3
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
would you think GM would put a sand like finish on the rollers? can't even think you would think that. the BIGGEST difference that the LS7 lifter has over the others and I've never heard anybody point this out IS that the oil hole in the LS7 lifter is about twice the size of the hole in my stock LS2 lifter hence you get better oiling on the top end.
#5
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
OK good to know. While I'm at it (hate to start another thread), any comments about ls7 vs Comp 850's? One thing I'm looking for is quietness in lifters, some commenter said they switched to 850's which were quieter than their previous ls7's. Too bad it's such a huge PITA to change them, would hate to make the wrong choice.
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Enthusiast
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I've recently installed a set of the bulk sold 12499225 LS7 lifters and with stock rockers no less, on a BTR state 2 N/A cam, the valve train is very quiet. Maybe near stock LS1 levels of quiet. I am very pleased with their performance for the dollar.
I also did not notice any abnormal looking surface finishes on the rollers.
I also did not notice any abnormal looking surface finishes on the rollers.
Last edited by Mr. Black; 03-24-2019 at 09:52 AM. Reason: grammar
#9
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Have LS7's in my 416 and so far they are good. If your cranking the valve springs pressure above ~400-420, probably worth going aftermarket.
For ~ $100 set of lifters the LS7 lifter rocks.
For hardcore performance GM uses Johnson 2110 roller lifters in the COPO Camaro. They are about 5x times as expensive.