Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

400-450 lbft goal in stock L59

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-31-2019, 11:45 AM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Pender1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 62
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default 400-450 lbft goal in stock L59

Picked up a bone stock high-mileage L59 to swap into my K5. I'm wondering if 400-450 lbft is a possible/reasonable goal on stock parts (short block and heads). I've got to pull the valvetrain apart anyways, so now's the time to do it if I'm going to change springs, cams, etc. This is a semi-off-road truck with a SM465, so <4000 RPM is the world I'm going to live in.
Old 07-31-2019, 12:08 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Ls7colorado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Henderson, TN
Posts: 1,862
Received 451 Likes on 346 Posts

Default

stock cam and a tiny turbo that will spool very quick.
or maybe a LSA type positive displacement supercharger

Any cam swap is going to raise the power but it will be raising the power in the higher RPM range.

if you wanna stay N/A a Tbss intake (or 08-13 5.3 intake) will help some down low, long tube headers, and compression...Even with all that 400ftlbs below 4000rpm is gonna be tough and im talking flywheel numbers
Other than that your gonna need more cubes
Old 07-31-2019, 12:13 PM
  #3  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Pender1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 62
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ls7colorado
stock cam and a tiny turbo that will spool very quick.
or maybe a LSA type positive displacement supercharger

Any cam swap is going to raise the power but it will be raising the power in the higher RPM range.

if you wanna stay N/A a Tbss intake (or 08-13 5.3 intake) will help some down low, long tube headers, and compression...Even with all that 400ftlbs below 4000rpm is gonna be tough and im talking flywheel numbers
Other than that your gonna need more cubes
I'm not opposed to a supercharger, but that would be way down the line. Not enough budget for that in the short term. Not a fan of turbos. I'd prefer to stay N/A for now.

I'm sure 400 is a lofty goal, but it's my "perfect" build for the application. And yes, I'm talking numbers at the crank.
Old 07-31-2019, 12:51 PM
  #4  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,853
Received 315 Likes on 213 Posts

Default

400ft-lbs might be a little tough with that compression and displacement.
Old 07-31-2019, 12:55 PM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Ls7colorado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Henderson, TN
Posts: 1,862
Received 451 Likes on 346 Posts

Default

What gear and tire size are you running? the right gear will fix your torque problem witch you already know im sure.
Old 07-31-2019, 01:00 PM
  #6  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Pender1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 62
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KCS
400ft-lbs might be a little tough with that compression and displacement.
What would you call an achievable number?
Old 07-31-2019, 01:11 PM
  #7  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Pender1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 62
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ls7colorado
What gear and tire size are you running? the right gear will fix your torque problem witch you already know im sure.
Yes and no. You can't make up for no power without sacrificing drivability. Tires and gear may change at any moment, I've already changed them twice.
Old 07-31-2019, 02:32 PM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Ls7colorado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Henderson, TN
Posts: 1,862
Received 451 Likes on 346 Posts

Default

Right but since these engines operate at a higher RPM a lower gear would be necessary to get the engine up to its happy range. Stock is about as good as it gets without forced induction for anything below 3000rpm or so.
You could get a set of 4.8 pistons (flat top) and mill the heads to get the compression up to around 11:1, get a set of long tubes and a 08-13 5.3 intake. That would probabaly get you close to your goal and make the most torque I can think of without shifting the power higher in the RPM range with a cam swap
Maybe someone else has some better Ideas
Old 07-31-2019, 02:57 PM
  #9  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
ddnspider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 14,610
Received 1,749 Likes on 1,306 Posts

Default

You need a positive displacement supercharger in your life for off idle to 4k power. Turbo and centrifugal blower are tough to size to make a ton of power that low unless you intentionally size the blower pulley really small or under size the turbo.
Old 07-31-2019, 03:40 PM
  #10  
12 Second Club
 
Utinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 928
Likes: 0
Received 177 Likes on 130 Posts
Default

This cost just a little more than a heads/cam package:
https://boostdistrict.com/collections/truck-kits/5-3
Old 07-31-2019, 03:45 PM
  #11  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Pender1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 62
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Utinator
This cost just a little more than a heads/cam package:
https://boostdistrict.com/collections/truck-kits/5-3
Yea, that'd be nice, but way out of my price range.

And good lord do they need to hire a website person. That thing's fugly.
Old 07-31-2019, 03:53 PM
  #12  
12 Second Club
 
Utinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 928
Likes: 0
Received 177 Likes on 130 Posts
Default

My heads/cam swap cost me around $3500-$4000 with labor. I think the parts were around $2500. You can do it for less if you can do the work yourself. The parts for a cam swap are about $1200-$1500 alone. Heads can run anywhere from a few hundred to a couple thousand. It all depends on how you do it.

If you really need that much low end torque, then the roots style blower is your best bet. Those LSA superchargers won't fit in my car. If they did, I'd probably have one. I love torque.
Old 07-31-2019, 04:05 PM
  #13  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Pender1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 62
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Utinator
My heads/cam swap cost me around $3500-$4000 with labor. I think the parts were around $2500. You can do it for less if you can do the work yourself. The parts for a cam swap are about $1200-$1500 alone. Heads can run anywhere from a few hundred to a couple thousand. It all depends on how you do it.

If you really need that much low end torque, then the roots style blower is your best bet. Those LSA superchargers won't fit in my car. If they did, I'd probably have one. I love torque.
My whole thing is I don't want to have to buy new heads. I'm doing all the work myself up to the point that I have a CNC and lathe, though I'd call myself amateur at using either. If it was affordable and fitting it under the hood was the only issue, I'd take a cutoff wheel to my hood in a second. Not like the paint on it is any good anyways.
Old 07-31-2019, 04:53 PM
  #14  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
ddnspider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 14,610
Received 1,749 Likes on 1,306 Posts

Default

This can be a done with the right size turbo too...
Old 08-01-2019, 11:24 AM
  #15  
On The Tree
 
LSleeper1500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 193
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

You say K5 so I immediately think of at least a 29" tire up to a 35". With that alone, damn near impossible N/A. Even a decent 6.0 would be tough to get there. Throw a decent turbo on it and roast em.
Old 08-01-2019, 11:36 AM
  #16  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Pender1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 62
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LSleeper1500
You say K5 so I immediately think of at least a 29" tire up to a 35". With that alone, damn near impossible N/A. Even a decent 6.0 would be tough to get there. Throw a decent turbo on it and roast em.
No offense, but what does tire size have to do with crank HP?
Old 08-01-2019, 11:41 AM
  #17  
On The Tree
 
LSleeper1500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 193
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Pender1
No offense, but what does tire size have to do with crank HP?
Missed the crank part. But what're the chances it'll be on engine dyno? Waste of money just to be disappointed honestly with a n/a build
Old 08-01-2019, 11:56 AM
  #18  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Pender1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 62
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LSleeper1500
Missed the crank part. But what're the chances it'll be on engine dyno? Waste of money just to be disappointed honestly with a n/a build
It'll never see a dyno most likely in any form. 450 is the max torque I am comfortable putting in before I have to start upgrading other parts of my driveline. So in a perfect world I'd get exactly that and WHP would just be what it is.
Old 08-01-2019, 12:45 PM
  #19  
On The Tree
 
LSleeper1500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 193
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

that much torque won't come from a 4.8/5.3 in NA form unless it's a crazy radical build. 12+ Compression, crazy heads, etc. Boost it or at least go to a 6.0 or 6.2 for those goals if you're staying NA
Old 08-01-2019, 01:42 PM
  #20  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Ls7colorado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Henderson, TN
Posts: 1,862
Received 451 Likes on 346 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Pender1
It'll never see a dyno most likely in any form. 450 is the max torque I am comfortable putting in before I have to start upgrading other parts of my driveline. So in a perfect world I'd get exactly that and WHP would just be what it is.
yea because 451ft lbs will destroy everything!!!! lol

Seriously though what engine is in it now?
What do you plan to do with it?
The following users liked this post:
ddnspider (08-01-2019)


Quick Reply: 400-450 lbft goal in stock L59



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:51 AM.