Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

ANOTHER boosted 5.3 build with summit bottom end

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-06-2019 | 07:52 PM
  #121  
Kfxguy's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 4,382
Likes: 663
From: Louisiana
Default

Got a text today saying my rotating assembly is ready for pickup. My buddy went picked it up for me while I was at work. Headed to his house to get it shortly. Ima try and have the bottom end done this weekend.
The following users liked this post:
G Atsma (12-07-2019)
Old 12-08-2019 | 02:20 AM
  #122  
Kfxguy's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 4,382
Likes: 663
From: Louisiana
Default

Today I made some headway. I got the crank in the block. I’m wondering about the clearances I ended up with. The three middle mains are .0015 and the two outer are .0018. It is an aluminum block, I never rev or get on it till it’s up to operating temp. I did use plasti gauge and it usually reads about .00025 too small. So it may be more around .00175 and .002. Guess I should have checked it with the mic. I figured it’s close enough. It turns very smooth and easy.

got the block honed.

detailed the block with a die grinder. Not necessary but I didn’t want to chance and casting flash flaking off. There were a few pieces I touch and the fell off.

I pulled the Allen head plugs out the block, cleaned them up and proxy painted them black. No big deal but being nasty looking was bothering me.


I hung the rods on the pistons. I only did 7 because I gotta send one piston back. My machinist said this one must have slipped by quality control and the bit they used was worn out because the wrist pin would not even go in the piston. He didn’t tell me anything and just honed it for me. But I don’t like how rough the hone job is because the pin still catches if you push on it. The finish just looks way too rough. He said it’ll be fine, but it’ll be in the back of my mind and I’d rather not chance it.

I hate spirolocks btw. But after watching a quick YouTube video, I learned how to install them easily.

im not worried about the main studs. I feel good about it. I went hung out at my buddy’s shop for a while and he told me he has done 12 engines with the arp main studs without line honing and never had an issue. Including aluminum blocks. I value his word and he’s never lied to me. He always shoots straight with me. He has a stock bottom end, aluminum block 5.3 that went 8.90’s and it had studs and regular arp head bolts. That motor is still going.

tomorrow I’ll gap the rings and hang 7 rods and pistons. Then it’s the waiting game again on a replacement piston. I need to order one of those plates you bolt on the valley and you hook your hoist to it to pull the motor. I keep putting it off. I’ve got to finish up my buddies turbo manifold using my car and mockup and then I’ll pull the motor out.






The following users liked this post:
freeky (12-08-2019)
Old 12-08-2019 | 03:52 PM
  #123  
Kfxguy's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 4,382
Likes: 663
From: Louisiana
Default

Meant to post the pic with caps on.



Old 12-08-2019 | 04:05 PM
  #124  
Kfxguy's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 4,382
Likes: 663
From: Louisiana
Default

Time to gap the rings. Ugh. My most unfavorite thing to do. I know I could use a piston and a ring on the second groove to square the ring up in the bore, but I’d rather something easier to deal with. And I like making tools. So I whipped this up real quick. Serves it’s purpose very well.





The following users liked this post:
Woodylyf767 (03-04-2021)
Old 12-08-2019 | 04:31 PM
  #125  
Kfxguy's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 4,382
Likes: 663
From: Louisiana
Default

I forgot about this. My buddy insisted I take this jewel with me to make like easier. Boy he wasn’t kidding. I need to get me one. He added variable speed control too.



Old 12-08-2019 | 04:43 PM
  #126  
Kfxguy's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 4,382
Likes: 663
From: Louisiana
Default

Btw I settled on .024 on the top ring and .026 on the second ring. It’s a little wider than what wiseco recommends so hopefully will be safe.
Old 12-08-2019 | 04:57 PM
  #127  
Mavn's Avatar
"I MAID THEESE"
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,744
Likes: 676
From: Houston
Default

You going to deck the block for flatness ?
Old 12-08-2019 | 06:03 PM
  #128  
Kfxguy's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 4,382
Likes: 663
From: Louisiana
Default

Originally Posted by Mavn
You going to deck the block for flatness ?
nope. Didn’t on my gto and it’s been fine. Many others don’t either. I checked it and it’s flat.
Old 12-09-2019 | 09:59 PM
  #129  
gjestico's Avatar
TECH Regular
10 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 405
Likes: 32
From: Vancouver area, West coast Canada
Default

Did you get the crank balanced ? Looks like a small amount was removed from the counterweight.
Old 12-09-2019 | 10:46 PM
  #130  
wannafbody's Avatar
TECH Veteran
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,808
Likes: 868
From: Pittsburgh
Default

Why would studs possible distort the bore vs bolts? Can they be overtightened more easily than bolts?
Old 12-09-2019 | 10:52 PM
  #131  
Kfxguy's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 4,382
Likes: 663
From: Louisiana
Default

Originally Posted by gjestico
Did you get the crank balanced ? Looks like a small amount was removed from the counterweight.
yes I got it balanced. It does not look like much was taken off at all. I honestly think I could have ran it. I’m gonna ask my machinist what he thinks about that. How far out it was and if he thinks I could have gotten away with it.
Old 12-09-2019 | 11:04 PM
  #132  
Kfxguy's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 4,382
Likes: 663
From: Louisiana
Default

Originally Posted by wannafbody
Why would studs possible distort the bore vs bolts? Can they be overtightened more easily than bolts?
well they say that if you use more clamping force it could distort the bore. However. The inners are torqued are 60ft lbs and the outers at 50ft lbs. which seems to be the same specs for the stock bolts according to what people have took note of. Example:







so I’m not sure how the arp studs would change anything with essentially the same tq. I’d be willing to be MOST people don’t get their blocks line honed when putting those studs in. Two of my buddies that have build many ls engines both told me they never have had to get a block line honed. So ima run it.
Old 12-10-2019 | 06:29 AM
  #133  
Che70velle's Avatar
ModSquad
10 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 6,662
Likes: 3,763
From: Dawsonville Ga.
Default

If you measure clearances while assembling, you’ll know if your main bores are out of round. Did you measure KFX? The answer here is right in front of you.
Old 12-10-2019 | 06:56 AM
  #134  
Kfxguy's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 4,382
Likes: 663
From: Louisiana
Default

Originally Posted by Che70velle
If you measure clearances while assembling, you’ll know if your main bores are out of round. Did you measure KFX? The answer here is right in front of you.
after I mic’ed the rods and and then read up on it, the bores are out of round if you measure across the parting line vs top and bottom, and evidently it’s supposed to be like that. So I plasti gauge it. Then finding out the tq values are the same between stock and the arp, I see no reason to stress over it.
Old 12-10-2019 | 07:42 AM
  #135  
5.7stroker's Avatar
TECH Addict
15 Year Member
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,166
Likes: 215
From: OH
Default

Why stop at 5.3? Hows that supposed to break the bank?

If you go 427 Dart or LSX block you can spend $50k+ in supporting mods to hold all that extra power!

/sarcasm
Old 12-10-2019 | 07:46 AM
  #136  
Kfxguy's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 4,382
Likes: 663
From: Louisiana
Default

Originally Posted by 5.7stroker
Why stop at 5.3? Hows that supposed to break the bank?

If you go 427 Dart or LSX block you can spend $50k+ in supporting mods to hold all that extra power!

/sarcasm

true. Too late now. This motor is almost done.
Old 12-10-2019 | 07:54 AM
  #137  
ddnspider's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,608
Likes: 1,753
From: FL
Default

Originally Posted by 5.7stroker
Why stop at 5.3? Hows that supposed to break the bank?

If you go 427 Dart or LSX block you can spend $50k+ in supporting mods to hold all that extra power!

/sarcasm
Your last boost build was when? Please share.
Old 12-10-2019 | 08:13 AM
  #138  
Know It All's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 154
Likes: 12
Default

Originally Posted by Kfxguy
after I mic’ed the rods and and then read up on it, the bores are out of round if you measure across the parting line vs top and bottom, and evidently it’s supposed to be like that. So I plasti gauge it. Then finding out the tq values are the same between stock and the arp, I see no reason to stress over it.
The housing bore ID is supposed to be round within a certain tolerance (couple tenths), and the bearing ID is supposed to be elliptical, larger at the parting line and then tightest at 12 and 6 o'clock. So, if the bore is going to be out of round, it's best the be big at the parting line area. If it's tighter at the parting line area, you could wipe out the bearings.
Old 12-10-2019 | 08:32 AM
  #139  
Kfxguy's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 4,382
Likes: 663
From: Louisiana
Default

Originally Posted by ddnspider
Your last boost build was when? Please share.
I think he was just kidding
Old 12-10-2019 | 08:57 AM
  #140  
Kfxguy's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 4,382
Likes: 663
From: Louisiana
Default

Originally Posted by Know It All
The housing bore ID is supposed to be round within a certain tolerance (couple tenths), and the bearing ID is supposed to be elliptical, larger at the parting line and then tightest at 12 and 6 o'clock. So, if the bore is going to be out of round, it's best the be big at the parting line area. If it's tighter at the parting line area, you could wipe out the bearings.

what are you, some kind of know it all or something? Lol.

I was considering checking. But I’m 99.9% sure it’s good. Only main bearing issues I’ve read about is when people set up aluminum block clearance like iron block calls for. On the one hand I wanna check it, but I know it’s fine.


Quick Reply: ANOTHER boosted 5.3 build with summit bottom end



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:12 PM.