Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Another Street/Performance Cam discussion (LQ4)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 30, 2019 | 06:22 PM
  #41  
Fast355's Avatar
TECH Resident
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 986
Likes: 172
From: Euless, TX
Default

Originally Posted by G Atsma
A sheet metal intake will behave nicely at low speeds (more a function of the cam anyway), but won't make nearly as much power as a stock or FAST. You don't have the flow velocity.
The sheetmetal intake with the heads and cam made more power than the stock LS1 GTO heads/cam and intake on the dyno everywhere from 2,500+.

The car does not even come close to being able to plant the power it has as is.

The FAST cathederal port truck intake and nick williams 102mm DBW throttle body did not impress me on the 6.0L S10 I tuned. Could have been the low compression from 317 heads or the cam or the 3.42 gears behind the 4L80E. As a whole I felt the truck should have been alot quicker.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2019 | 08:00 PM
  #42  
G Atsma's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 22,288
Likes: 3,615
From: Central Cal.
Default

I'm sure there are differences between sheetmetal intakes. I might be referring to tests that used ones with weaker low end than what you used. Hopefully there are some that have a good powerband. Of course having a cam that "talks nice" with such a manifold would make a big difference too.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2019 | 11:06 AM
  #43  
Bspeck82's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,758
Likes: 442
Default

Nothing to do with a tune. Its mathematics. Sheet metal intakes do not provide velocity required to feed the engine throughout 75% of the rpm range. If your only spinning to 7000-7500 this would be foolish and you'd be utilizing the power offered from the sheet metal intake for 500 rpms....so that being said AVERAGE power would be much higher with a long runner intake like a fast or MSD which is why they are so popular. If it's a race car with a big cam, lots of hear, little weight and a loose converter then yes, rock the sheet metal intake Everything else, no. You will be slower, partial throttle application will feel lethargic. I dont care how it felt in your car, a bolt on ls1 with a 3600 converter will roast tires when you nail it on the street. Tune has nothing to do with it, a proper cam will help take more of an advantage of the sheet metals power potential and you likely would want the same cam in a sheet metal intake as you would a stock style.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2019 | 11:57 AM
  #44  
Mgill's Avatar
Launching!
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 217
Likes: 10
From: Jim Thorpe
Default

Honestly with your setup I would call for a custom grind.

That being said, I will be going with a 228r in my ls6 swapped trans am when I get to that project. It might be an "old school grind" but it makes decent power with good drivability.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2019 | 11:59 AM
  #45  
Fast355's Avatar
TECH Resident
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 986
Likes: 172
From: Euless, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Bspeck82
Nothing to do with a tune. Its mathematics. Sheet metal intakes do not provide velocity required to feed the engine throughout 75% of the rpm range. If your only spinning to 7000-7500 this would be foolish and you'd be utilizing the power offered from the sheet metal intake for 500 rpms....so that being said AVERAGE power would be much higher with a long runner intake like a fast or MSD which is why they are so popular. If it's a race car with a big cam, lots of hear, little weight and a loose converter then yes, rock the sheet metal intake Everything else, no. You will be slower, partial throttle application will feel lethargic. I dont care how it felt in your car, a bolt on ls1 with a 3600 converter will roast tires when you nail it on the street. Tune has nothing to do with it, a proper cam will help take more of an advantage of the sheet metals power potential and you likely would want the same cam in a sheet metal intake as you would a stock style.
It does not feel lethargic at all. You must just be really dense. Just because it is sheet metal does not mean it has massive ports!
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2019 | 01:38 PM
  #46  
Sebambam's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 384
Likes: 53
Default

Originally Posted by Mgill
Honestly with your setup I would call for a custom grind.

That being said, I will be going with a 228r in my ls6 swapped trans am when I get to that project. It might be an "old school grind" but it makes decent power with good drivability.
I think a custom grind it s not needed. The bottom end us stock. The heads are worked that's it. The intake choice will be a very common choice.
I looked into the 228R as well. But I have to say I'm tempted by the summit cam and so I ll rather consider it.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2019 | 04:53 PM
  #47  
Bspeck82's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,758
Likes: 442
Default

Originally Posted by Fast355
It does not feel lethargic at all. You must just be really dense. Just because it is sheet metal does not mean it has massive ports!
its not the size of the ports I am referring too but the length of the runners. Large ports with short runners favor high rpm where a greater demand of air is required in a shorter amount of time. It may feel just fine for you, but it could be better.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2019 | 08:32 PM
  #48  
Sebambam's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 384
Likes: 53
Default

Adding another intake to the "game" the dorman or dorman replica 615-183 truck intake.
I have a comple old style truck intake with rails inj. And dbc tb. thus parts would fit right on.
this intake is a 3 piece and as far as i understand comes close to the tbss performance.
+ you can port it easily.

Now.. would a102 mm tb work on this guy IF ported?

Reply
Old Dec 1, 2019 | 09:47 PM
  #49  
Fast355's Avatar
TECH Resident
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 986
Likes: 172
From: Euless, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Bspeck82
its not the size of the ports I am referring too but the length of the runners. Large ports with short runners favor high rpm where a greater demand of air is required in a shorter amount of time. It may feel just fine for you, but it could be better.
I am very familiar with runner length and also CSA.

I have also played with the LT1 and it only has a 4" intake runner in the manifold. I have played with a long runner TPI too. Also played with dual plane and single plane intakes.

I would love to see Edelbrock put injector holes in their high rise dual plane intake. Then a person could run a 1200 cfm 4150 throttle body on top. The dual plane intake has an even flatter torque curve than any single length intake runner.

I have been running a dual plane efi intake on a healthy 383 for over 6 months. It makes killer torque and still has great hp up top. My VE table is almost flat as the rpm rises and the cylinder air graph stays high and flat from off-idle through redline.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2019 | 08:59 AM
  #50  
Mgill's Avatar
Launching!
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 217
Likes: 10
From: Jim Thorpe
Default

Originally Posted by Sebambam
I think a custom grind it s not needed. The bottom end us stock. The heads are worked that's it. The intake choice will be a very common choice.
I looked into the 228R as well. But I have to say I'm tempted by the summit cam and so I ll rather consider it.
My stock bottom end lq4, with stock 241 heads and stock ls6 intake with a custom grind cam made 425 wheel with pretty low compression. Huge cam with terrible driveability at low throttle tho. I would call around for a custom grind, hell summit would probably even spec you a good custom grind for a decent price.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2019 | 05:50 AM
  #51  
Sebambam's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 384
Likes: 53
Default

No input on the dorman 615-183 intake ?
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2019 | 07:11 AM
  #52  
ddnspider's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,628
Likes: 1,778
From: FL
Default

Originally Posted by Fast355
The sheetmetal intake with the heads and cam made more power than the stock LS1 GTO heads/cam and intake on the dyno everywhere from 2,500+.

The car does not even come close to being able to plant the power it has as is.
post the data as that is opposite of every other back to back test. No surprise it doesn't hook..... But that's not due to the intake.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2019 | 11:00 AM
  #53  
G Atsma's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 22,288
Likes: 3,615
From: Central Cal.
Default

Originally Posted by Sebambam
Adding another intake to the "game" the dorman or dorman replica 615-183 truck intake.
I have a comple old style truck intake with rails inj. And dbc tb. thus parts would fit right on.
this intake is a 3 piece and as far as i understand comes close to the tbss performance.
+ you can port it easily.

Now.. would a102 mm tb work on this guy IF ported?
It would flow well, but I wouldn't try to put a102 TB on it. I doubt there is that much meat to port out to fit it.

Last edited by G Atsma; Dec 6, 2019 at 02:18 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2019 | 01:09 PM
  #54  
Sebambam's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 384
Likes: 53
Default

Originally Posted by G Atsma
,
It would flow well, but I wouldn't try to put a102 TB on it. I doubt there is that much meat to port out to fit it.
I see , well i ordered it to see the potential
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2019 | 02:16 PM
  #55  
Sebambam's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 384
Likes: 53
Default

615-183x intake came.
I can definitely see why it is a tbss competitor lol.
Some portwork will be needed but who can complain at 79$ shipped?





Reply
Old Dec 6, 2019 | 11:32 PM
  #56  
wannafbody's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,589
Likes: 1,140
From: Pittsburgh
Default

Might not be too ugly if shaved down on top.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2019 | 10:44 AM
  #57  
Sebambam's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 384
Likes: 53
Default

Originally Posted by wannafbody
Might not be too ugly if shaved down on top.
exactly, And as far as i know it will clear the stock hood on my GM A-Body at least it did on a Cutlass lol.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2019 | 06:08 PM
  #58  
Sebambam's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 384
Likes: 53
Default

Got the cam as well . Summit pro LS stage 2


Reply
Old Dec 8, 2019 | 02:49 PM
  #59  
wannafbody's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,589
Likes: 1,140
From: Pittsburgh
Default

That cam should work well.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2019 | 12:26 PM
  #60  
daaaanz67's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 53
Likes: 3
Default

Following this thread.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:55 PM.