Max rpm for 2001 ls1 short block
#21
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Car is a 6 speed with 4.30 gears. The car doesn't feel like it's falling on its face are losing anything before at the limiter it's actually feels like it's just geting into the swing of things. I haven't dinah'll the car in a really long time maybe I should go through it perfect my wide open throttle tune with the wide band check valve Springs do a tune up into a couple pulls.
The following users liked this post:
00pooterSS (02-26-2020)
The following users liked this post:
00pooterSS (02-26-2020)
The following users liked this post:
00pooterSS (02-26-2020)
The following users liked this post:
00pooterSS (02-26-2020)
#26
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (40)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Based on the info I think it'll do just fine spinning to 7k, don't think this one will see a lot above that.
I'm always a little more concerned with where it hits the next gear than how high it can spin, but I understand asking about it and planning it out too.
I don't own a t56 car and my f body was an auto, so I'm not real up on the rpm drop per gear change.
But Id bet shifting right around 7 is going to be best, prob won't do much for the et taking it higher. May even find it wants it lower with that setup. only testing will tell
And besides all that, most peoples valve train isn't really setup to do well above 7k anyway.
I'm always a little more concerned with where it hits the next gear than how high it can spin, but I understand asking about it and planning it out too.
I don't own a t56 car and my f body was an auto, so I'm not real up on the rpm drop per gear change.
But Id bet shifting right around 7 is going to be best, prob won't do much for the et taking it higher. May even find it wants it lower with that setup. only testing will tell
And besides all that, most peoples valve train isn't really setup to do well above 7k anyway.
#28
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It's been a long time and about 50k since the car was last dynoed. And the run was cut short . I have been looking at intakes for the last 6 months. . Looking for some thing that has a balance between high rpm power and still keeps the resonator property's of a good desine. The fast 102 starts fighting the system above 6800 rpm.
#29
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (40)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It's been a long time and about 50k since the car was last dynoed. And the run was cut short . I have been looking at intakes for the last 6 months. . Looking for some thing that has a balance between high rpm power and still keeps the resonator property's of a good desine. The fast 102 starts fighting the system above 6800 rpm.
Fast intakes are excellent from idle to up to around 7k (and from what you posted that's the rev range you are using)
You want an intake that does well over 7k? You can get one, but it'll be **** down low up to around 5k. Keep that in mind. They all have a range they work in, none of them cover idle to 10k
Also, FAST has short, mid, and long runner length runners, you can swap them out for your intended rpm usage if you plan on revving higher.
If you don't have a built bottom end, and bad *** valve train, you don't need an intake made for working well above 7k, it's not where you're going to be running the car. If you are planning on doing a high rpm build, then I get it, but if you were you wouldn't be asking how high you can rev a stock bottom end lol.
The following users liked this post:
00pooterSS (02-27-2020)
#36
TECH Enthusiast
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I was concerned about this as well with my 2000, I've decided to spin to 7000. We'll see how it goes.
The following users liked this post:
00pooterSS (02-29-2020)
The following users liked this post:
00pooterSS (02-29-2020)
The following 3 users liked this post by HioSSilver: