Valve springs
Now you have a bigger cam and it works, well you can add .250 lift and change the valve opening and closing times and it can provide a ton of clearance. That cam card you have pictured says a lot. the exhaust closes 23.5 degrees after tdc, the intake opens 19.5 before tdc.
It didn't break right away because with dome top pistons the valve hit flat, if it was a flat top piston it would have hit the valve on the edge and been a problem first time.
Most reputable shops won't throw other shops under the bus. The most important thing to say, read this carefully. If the first builder didn't do anything wrong why did he put inadequate valve springs in it? The second shop didn't say anything about the first shops mistake of installing weak springs? Hmm. What did he do just trust the specs off the box? Didn't check the actual spring rate? Someone fucked up. You can't say it was Lunati's fault, someone put the wrong springs in it if thats what you're claiming the problem was. It looks like lack of piston to valve clearance. So someone fucked up right? Who do you think it was?

When valve float is present, all valve closing timing events go out the window. It gets messy quick.
Now...could PTV have been a little on the tighter side? Sure. For a race application, you’ll always lean toward the tighter side, for power sake...pushing things to the limits. That’s what race engine builders do. But here, I’d point to incorrect springs, or springs not set up correctly as the culprit.
When valve float is present, all valve closing timing events go out the window. It gets messy quick.
Now...could PTV have been a little on the tighter side? Sure. For a race application, you’ll always lean toward the tighter side, for power sake...pushing things to the limits. That’s what race engine builders do. But here, I’d point to incorrect springs, or springs not set up correctly as the culprit.
Just my opinion, a professional engine builder should be building engines that last longer than 80 miles. Is it wrong to think this?
When valve float is present, all valve closing timing events go out the window. It gets messy quick.
Now...could PTV have been a little on the tighter side? Sure. For a race application, you’ll always lean toward the tighter side, for power sake...pushing things to the limits. That’s what race engine builders do. But here, I’d point to incorrect springs, or springs not set up correctly as the culprit.
Now you have a bigger cam and it works, well you can add .250 lift and change the valve opening and closing times and it can provide a ton of clearance. That cam card you have pictured says a lot. the exhaust closes 23.5 degrees after tdc, the intake opens 19.5 before tdc.
It didn't break right away because with dome top pistons the valve hit flat, if it was a flat top piston it would have hit the valve on the edge and been a problem first time.
Most reputable shops won't throw other shops under the bus. The most important thing to say, read this carefully. If the first builder didn't do anything wrong why did he put inadequate valve springs in it? The second shop didn't say anything about the first shops mistake of installing weak springs? Hmm. What did he do just trust the specs off the box? Didn't check the actual spring rate? Someone fucked up. You can't say it was Lunati's fault, someone put the wrong springs in it if thats what you're claiming the problem was. It looks like lack of piston to valve clearance. So someone fucked up right? Who do you think it was?

Edit -- Wanted to expand on this. When I typed I was sitting on an airplane on my phone. Here are a couple of examples.
232/240-111+3 on flat top pistons, no reliefs, .550 lift, .041 head gasket. Pistons will hit the intake valves.
226/234-111+3 on flat pistons, no reliefs, .750 lift, .041 head gasket. Pistons will clear the valves
Last edited by Darth_V8r; Mar 9, 2020 at 03:31 PM.






