Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

5.3L build for truck

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-30-2020, 12:05 PM
  #41  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (40)
 
00pooterSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Dallas
Posts: 4,916
Received 524 Likes on 372 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Rob M
specifically talking about LS/(New LT...) truck cams even more specifically towing & 4x4 cams, I assume(?)




That makes sense as far as fighting reversion & scavenging, even with stock manifolds
single pattern cams were popular when LS cams first came out, the 224 used to be the go to LS cam that was a single pattern but then they started introducing cams with more exh duration in the mid 2000's or so and it's stayed that way for your typical shelf grind.. There are a few freaky ones out there that don't but they're odd ducks built for not so normal builds.

Old 10-30-2020, 12:11 PM
  #42  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Rob M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 169
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Yeah I remember when the Reverse-Split craze in the LS was all the rage. Every guru insisted that the LS needed a R-S cam lol
The following users liked this post:
00pooterSS (10-30-2020)
Old 03-14-2024, 09:14 PM
  #43  
Teching In
 
elg180's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2024
Posts: 47
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 00pooterSS
First off before I comment I'll say I have been driving 5.3 trucks for the last 10 years. And I'm in a similar situation as you are.

After years of pondering this the absolute best thing you can do is not do a 5.3 build. You need cubic inches. Badly. Especially with having a 4L60 a lift, and big tires. There's only so much a 5.3 can do.

Either bore the 5.3 out while it is apart or grab a 6.0 bottom end and put the 706 heads on and go from there. The 6.0 would be a far better choice. Or boring a 6.0 some would be best. But a 6.0 bottom end will still work wonders over the 5.3

As said always do the highlift truck cam option. When there are two of the same cams in different lifts, if you look at the dyno overlays the high lift gains power everywhere over the low lift.

If you keep a stock stall, you'll need a mild cam, and a mild cam in a 5.3 isn't going to be much different than it is now. You'll gain 40 ish hp and 20 ft lbs or tq, and it won't be down low where you are towing.

If you tossed in a bone stock 6.0 you'd be far happier than building the 5.3 and putting in a small cam. That one point of compression will give you approx 4% more power. That's about 15 hp or so. The cam 20-40 hp, but not much torque. You need torque and you need it down low. Camming the 5.3 is gonna kill some of your low end. You're gonna hate towing with a cammed 5.3 with a stock stall.

If anything I would do a stock 6.0 and a small stall way before I did a mildly built 5.3 with a mild cam and stock stall.

Have you ever had a higher rpm stall before? They transform the vehicle and make it feel like you added 200 ft lbs down low, cause you kinda do through torque multiplication.
I'm sure I probably will get a lot of flack for this but I would ditch that 4l60 as soon as possible and put in a 4l80. I installed a brand new TCI 4L60E supposedly built for $750 horsepower it lasted all of 500 miles not to mention I paid $4,600 bucks for it and they wouldn't refund the money
Old 03-16-2024, 01:36 AM
  #44  
Teching In
 
GarageBeers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Great info learning a lot thanks
Old 03-22-2024, 06:22 AM
  #45  
Teching In
 
elg180's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2024
Posts: 47
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Dyno numbers in a are around 300 at the wheels
Old 03-22-2024, 06:24 AM
  #46  
Teching In
 
elg180's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2024
Posts: 47
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I should add that's at 9:00 to 1:00 compression



Quick Reply: 5.3L build for truck



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:54 PM.