Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Porting 243 heads

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 10, 2020 | 03:14 PM
  #1  
86bucket's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Default Porting 243 heads

I am porting a set of 243 heads. Using a GM exhaust gasket to mark the area to "raise the roof." Why does it look like I need to open it up so much? What am I doing wrong?

Reply
Old Apr 10, 2020 | 05:25 PM
  #2  
SoCalDave's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 362
Likes: 133
From: California
Default

The stock exhaust gasket is actually much larger than the stock exhaust manifold so double check that you don't raise the roof too much.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2020 | 07:03 PM
  #3  
LLLosingit's Avatar
TECH Junkie
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 3,844
Likes: 487
From: Iowa
Default

I don't have a flow bench so I don't have any first hand experience. After watching countless video's on porting 243 heads I pretty much came to the conclusion that there isn't anything to be gained by opening the exhaust port.

Last edited by LLLosingit; Apr 10, 2020 at 07:41 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2020 | 07:11 PM
  #4  
86bucket's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SoCalDave
The stock exhaust gasket is actually much larger than the stock exhaust manifold so double check that you don't raise the roof too much.
So what gasket is this guy using? Basically trying to do what's at 3:50. My gasket seems giant compared to his? Thanks
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2020 | 07:18 PM
  #5  
SoCalDave's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 362
Likes: 133
From: California
Default



243 cylinder head that I raised the roof. This set of 243 heads will go on a C5 and should wake it up nicely. The pictures is not the best still it should show that I raised the roof and still left plenty of material.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2020 | 07:22 PM
  #6  
SoCalDave's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 362
Likes: 133
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by 86bucket
So what gasket is this guy using? Basically trying to do what's at 3:50. My gasket seems giant compared to his? Thanks
https://youtu.be/JAeSqBU6OJI
I'm not sure, but I'm using the exhaust gaskets that came off my '01 Camaro.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2020 | 07:40 PM
  #7  
86bucket's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Default

Ok, I get the idiot award for the day. 4:20 answered it lol Like you said also...
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2020 | 01:41 PM
  #8  
omc8's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,539
Likes: 26
From: columbus,ohio
Default

Originally Posted by LLLosingit
I don't have a flow bench so I don't have any first hand experience. After watching countless video's on porting 243 heads I pretty much came to the conclusion that there isn't anything to be gained by opening the exhaust port.
It's actually easier to get better results as a percentage on the exhaust ! Stock port is going to flow low 180s ........ good hand port 210 cfm when compared to top cnc programs !
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2020 | 02:13 PM
  #9  
showdog75's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,151
Likes: 246
From: Hixson TN
Default

I'd wager a bet that if you had a flow bench to quantify your results you'd hurt way more than you'll gain by porting without the aid of a flow bench. Bigger is not better.
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2020 | 02:21 PM
  #10  
LLLosingit's Avatar
TECH Junkie
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 3,844
Likes: 487
From: Iowa
Default

Originally Posted by omc8
It's actually easier to get better results as a percentage on the exhaust ! Stock port is going to flow low 180s ........ good hand port 210 cfm when compared to top cnc programs !
I'd have to search for the video, I'm not saying there aren't gains to be had overall. The video I watched they did step by step port work and put it on the bench with each change. Bowl blend was a good gain as was working the swirl ramp and guides on both intake and exhaust, Good gains with a good valve job and back cut valves, Unshrouding the valves and port matching were smaller gains but still an improvement if done correctly and can actually hurt flow if taken to far or done incorrectly.
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2020 | 09:22 PM
  #11  
omc8's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,539
Likes: 26
From: columbus,ohio
Default

Originally Posted by LLLosingit
I'd have to search for the video, I'm not saying there aren't gains to be had overall. The video I watched they did step by step port work and put it on the bench with each change. Bowl blend was a good gain as was working the swirl ramp and guides on both intake and exhaust, Good gains with a good valve job and back cut valves, Unshrouding the valves and port matching were smaller gains but still an improvement if done correctly and can actually hurt flow if taken to far or done incorrectly.
Yes agreed , there are no gains in simply hogging out the port exit or just belling it out behind the guide boss .This being op first set , focus on the areas that will net you the biggest gains A good valve job and bowl blend will net you 70% the results with minimal amount of work .
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2020 | 10:16 PM
  #12  
wannafbody's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,586
Likes: 1,138
From: Pittsburgh
Default

Often a smaller port will have better velocity than a larger port.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2020 | 11:07 PM
  #13  
01CamaroSSTx's Avatar
11 Second Club
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 5,979
Likes: 2,280
From: Conroe, Texas
Default

I would think just knocking off the rough, raising the roof some and smoothing the exhaust chambers would improve performance. Some good videos on the subject from StreetKillz Video Chronicles
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2020 | 10:28 AM
  #14  
64post's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,710
Likes: 228
From: Sonoma Co. Ca.
Default

Remove lumps and bumps, size reduce obstructions like the guide boss, blend the bowl to valve seat and if your really feeling it, blend the valve seat to the chamber so the transition there is seamless. Don’t make the port bigger, not really necessary. Most bang for the buck is bowl work.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2020 | 01:27 PM
  #15  
SoCalDave's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 362
Likes: 133
From: California
Default

If you want to know the theory behind head porting David Vizard has a few videos and some books on the subject. On Youtube HeadflowInc and David Vizard have the most useful information as to the reasons you should make certain mods to cylinder heads.
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2020 | 12:47 PM
  #16  
omc8's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,539
Likes: 26
From: columbus,ohio
Default

Originally Posted by 01CamaroSSTx
I would think just knocking off the rough, raising the roof some and smoothing the exhaust chambers would improve performance. Some good videos on the subject from StreetKillz Video Chronicles
I would not recommend his videos as guide for a novice for a number of reasons .His terminology is not accurate , there is no real benefit in removing the hump behind the valve guide boss if a novice starts digging there he could break through real quick and so on !
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:40 PM.