Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Help me plan my 6.0 refresh

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 15, 2020 | 01:17 PM
  #1  
TFA303's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 8
Likes: 3
Question Help me plan my 6.0 refresh

First off, as a new member, thank y'all so much - I've gotten a ton of useful info from this forum.


Goal: More usable torque in the low and mid range that I'll use as a daily driver, but with reliability and durability very important.
Currently: 2003 Suburban 2500 with a stock 6.0 LQ4, 317 heads, 150,000 miles

This is kind of "what cam do I need" but I think that before I ask that question I want to ensure I'm on a good track.

I've already bought a TBSS intake, eFans, and some 799 heads. I know that the intake and fans are pretty obvious, but I'm not sure if the heads are worth it. I think that's Question #1.
If I go with the heads, I'll have some light porting and a valve job done, plus replacing lifters, pushrods, springs, and rocker trunnions. I'd like to put all-new valvetrain components in, then leave it for good.

So,(Question #2) if I did the 799's, what cam makes sense?
Cam choice will of course drive spring/pushrod choice. (Anything that requires a converter would bust the budget.)

I'm not sure that anything other than long-tube headers and deleting the cats will help the exhaust much more, as it's a pretty good stock setup, but that's out of DIY territory for me.

What else am I missing?
Many thanks for any advice!
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2020 | 02:04 PM
  #2  
NAVYBLUE210's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,841
Likes: 252
From: Coast of San Mateo County Between Pacifica & HMB
Default

My suggestion: Call/Speak with Cam Motion.
Great People,Products, & Service.

That said their 6.0 Stage 2 High Lift looks a good fit for your goals with stock converter.
210*/216* 116*+5*

Last edited by NAVYBLUE210; Jun 15, 2020 at 02:14 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2020 | 02:06 PM
  #3  
Bspeck82's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,758
Likes: 442
Default

Originally Posted by TFA303
First off, as a new member, thank y'all so much - I've gotten a ton of useful info from this forum.


Goal: More usable torque in the low and mid range that I'll use as a daily driver, but with reliability and durability very important.
Currently: 2003 Suburban 2500 with a stock 6.0 LQ4, 317 heads, 150,000 miles

This is kind of "what cam do I need" but I think that before I ask that question I want to ensure I'm on a good track.

I've already bought a TBSS intake, eFans, and some 799 heads. I know that the intake and fans are pretty obvious, but I'm not sure if the heads are worth it. I think that's Question #1.
If I go with the heads, I'll have some light porting and a valve job done, plus replacing lifters, pushrods, springs, and rocker trunnions. I'd like to put all-new valvetrain components in, then leave it for good.

So,(Question #2) if I did the 799's, what cam makes sense?
Cam choice will of course drive spring/pushrod choice. (Anything that requires a converter would bust the budget.)

I'm not sure that anything other than long-tube headers and deleting the cats will help the exhaust much more, as it's a pretty good stock setup, but that's out of DIY territory for me.

What else am I missing?
Many thanks for any advice!
heads are good. TSP can port them for 800 bucks and is well worth it.

https://cammotion.com/camshafts/6-0-...210-216-116-5/

https://www.texas-speed.com/p-1172-p...-castings.aspx

I'd leave trunnions alone, get new ls7 lifters and 5/16 pushrods. They offer two versions of that cam, one that uses stock springs and a high lift that requires aftermarket springs.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2020 | 02:29 PM
  #4  
omc8's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,539
Likes: 26
From: columbus,ohio
Default

Well let's talk about head choice the 799 will give small bump in compression and slight tick in flow gain but that's about it .If money not a problem I go with one of better aftermarket 205 heads .but if we are limited to oem casting I would go with 862/706 have them ported and atleast 2" intake valves . As for the intake I'd probably just stay with the old style truck , off idle down low , you may be going backwards going to the TBSS.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2020 | 02:35 PM
  #5  
TFA303's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 8
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by omc8
As for the intake I'd probably just stay with the old style truck , off idle down low , you may be going backwards going to the TBSS.
Interesting, thanks.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2020 | 02:43 PM
  #6  
Bspeck82's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,758
Likes: 442
Default

Originally Posted by TFA303
Interesting, thanks.
the 799 heads are very good heads no need to swap them. The intake is also one of the best factory cathedral intakes on the market so it will he an excellent choice. No need to spend money to swap any of these. A good valve job and a small cam will really wake the truck up. Put a decent exhaust on it while you are at it and it will be a lot of fun to drive.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2020 | 02:44 PM
  #7  
Utinator's Avatar
12 Second Club
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 215
From: San Antonio
Default

I would definitely use the 799's, and "de-shroud" the valves if possible. That would give you more flow at lower lifts, which is what you use the most of anyway. I don't think porting the 799 heads will add much benefit to your application. In stock form, they are good up to .550" lift. After that, they need porting. I wouldn't go past .550" lift on the cam. It wouldn't hurt, but that is getting into "race mode" territory. Being that this is a daily driver in a heavy SUV, I'd stick with a more conservative build. One of the truck cams (stage-2) in about a .550" lift would be great, and not need a higher stall converter.

Reply
Old Jun 15, 2020 | 03:30 PM
  #8  
jlangley's Avatar
12 Second Club
5 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 333
Likes: 72
From: Langley BC
Default

Here is an interesting test on stock heads. Good argument to be made for 706 heads in a truck application.

Reply
Old Jun 15, 2020 | 10:09 PM
  #9  
CattleAc's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,642
Likes: 426
From: Dakota Territory
Default

I don't know if anyone has mentioned it, but one of the biggest improvements on these stock trucks is a decent tune...after you decide on what mods your going to do and implement them, make sure you know someone that can help you with that.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2020 | 09:15 AM
  #10  
TFA303's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 8
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by jlangley
Here is an interesting test on stock heads. Good argument to be made for 706 heads in a truck application.
Richard Holdener is a national treasure.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2020 | 03:07 PM
  #11  
tallan's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Default

did all 02+ have 317 heads?

any merit to porting the stockers?

everything I have read says tbss intake is way to go.

(looking to go down this route sooner than later)
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2020 | 10:29 PM
  #12  
omc8's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,539
Likes: 26
From: columbus,ohio
Default

Originally Posted by tallan
did all 02+ have 317 heads?

any merit to porting the stockers?

everything I have read says tbss intake is way to go.

(looking to go down this route sooner than later)
1. No ...... also 035
2. Yes port them minimum get a good vj back cuts help low mid flow ideal TQ tow app
3. You haven't read everything start with this thread !
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2020 | 11:42 PM
  #13  
G Atsma's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 22,288
Likes: 3,615
From: Central Cal.
Default

Originally Posted by tallan
Everything I have read says tbss intake is way to go.

(looking to go down this route sooner than later)
See post #4 in this thread. Just read the WHOLE thread....
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2020 | 02:05 PM
  #14  
tallan's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by G Atsma
See post #4 in this thread. Just read the WHOLE thread....
I was more talking about all the articles I read on the matter.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2020 | 10:26 AM
  #15  
TFA303's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 8
Likes: 3
Default

Thanks to all for the suggestions. I posted the same on another forum and got a lot of good advice, but that one resolved into "Just bolt on a blower and call it good", which I do admit is attractive, but I'm unconvinced that it's as affordable as the discussion indicated.

Have a great week, y'all.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2020 | 06:39 AM
  #16  
Ls7colorado's Avatar
TECH Addict
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,115
Likes: 610
From: Henderson, TN
Default

Originally Posted by TFA303
Thanks to all for the suggestions. I posted the same on another forum and got a lot of good advice, but that one resolved into "Just bolt on a blower and call it good", which I do admit is attractive, but I'm unconvinced that it's as affordable as the discussion indicated.

Have a great week, y'all.
a LSA would be perfect and give you WAY more power through the whole RPM range
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2020 | 09:03 PM
  #17  
00pooterSS's Avatar
TECH Veteran
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,920
Likes: 531
From: Dallas
Default

You mentioned leaving the exhaust stock, because it's pretty good... The piping may be but the stock mufflers are terrible. I've had a few different exhaust setups on my current truck, two of them using stock mufflers. Both times I got rid of the stock muffler for a straight through magnaflow I saw a big increase in performance and MPG.

At minimum do a straight through muffler if you leave the exhaust stock.
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:47 AM.