Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Help me plan my 6.0 refresh

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-15-2020, 01:17 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
TFA303's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 8
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Question Help me plan my 6.0 refresh

First off, as a new member, thank y'all so much - I've gotten a ton of useful info from this forum.


Goal: More usable torque in the low and mid range that I'll use as a daily driver, but with reliability and durability very important.
Currently: 2003 Suburban 2500 with a stock 6.0 LQ4, 317 heads, 150,000 miles

This is kind of "what cam do I need" but I think that before I ask that question I want to ensure I'm on a good track.

I've already bought a TBSS intake, eFans, and some 799 heads. I know that the intake and fans are pretty obvious, but I'm not sure if the heads are worth it. I think that's Question #1.
If I go with the heads, I'll have some light porting and a valve job done, plus replacing lifters, pushrods, springs, and rocker trunnions. I'd like to put all-new valvetrain components in, then leave it for good.

So,(Question #2) if I did the 799's, what cam makes sense?
Cam choice will of course drive spring/pushrod choice. (Anything that requires a converter would bust the budget.)

I'm not sure that anything other than long-tube headers and deleting the cats will help the exhaust much more, as it's a pretty good stock setup, but that's out of DIY territory for me.

What else am I missing?
Many thanks for any advice!
Old 06-15-2020, 02:04 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
 
NAVYBLUE210's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Coast of San Mateo County Between Pacifica & HMB
Posts: 1,822
Received 220 Likes on 131 Posts

Default

My suggestion: Call/Speak with Cam Motion.
Great People,Products, & Service.

That said their 6.0 Stage 2 High Lift looks a good fit for your goals with stock converter.
210*/216* 116*+5*

Last edited by NAVYBLUE210; 06-15-2020 at 02:14 PM.
The following users liked this post:
TFA303 (06-15-2020)
Old 06-15-2020, 02:06 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
 
Bspeck82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,734
Received 417 Likes on 302 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TFA303
First off, as a new member, thank y'all so much - I've gotten a ton of useful info from this forum.


Goal: More usable torque in the low and mid range that I'll use as a daily driver, but with reliability and durability very important.
Currently: 2003 Suburban 2500 with a stock 6.0 LQ4, 317 heads, 150,000 miles

This is kind of "what cam do I need" but I think that before I ask that question I want to ensure I'm on a good track.

I've already bought a TBSS intake, eFans, and some 799 heads. I know that the intake and fans are pretty obvious, but I'm not sure if the heads are worth it. I think that's Question #1.
If I go with the heads, I'll have some light porting and a valve job done, plus replacing lifters, pushrods, springs, and rocker trunnions. I'd like to put all-new valvetrain components in, then leave it for good.

So,(Question #2) if I did the 799's, what cam makes sense?
Cam choice will of course drive spring/pushrod choice. (Anything that requires a converter would bust the budget.)

I'm not sure that anything other than long-tube headers and deleting the cats will help the exhaust much more, as it's a pretty good stock setup, but that's out of DIY territory for me.

What else am I missing?
Many thanks for any advice!
heads are good. TSP can port them for 800 bucks and is well worth it.

https://cammotion.com/camshafts/6-0-...210-216-116-5/

https://www.texas-speed.com/p-1172-p...-castings.aspx

I'd leave trunnions alone, get new ls7 lifters and 5/16 pushrods. They offer two versions of that cam, one that uses stock springs and a high lift that requires aftermarket springs.
The following users liked this post:
TFA303 (06-15-2020)
Old 06-15-2020, 02:29 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
omc8's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: columbus,ohio
Posts: 1,539
Received 26 Likes on 22 Posts

Default

Well let's talk about head choice the 799 will give small bump in compression and slight tick in flow gain but that's about it .If money not a problem I go with one of better aftermarket 205 heads .but if we are limited to oem casting I would go with 862/706 have them ported and atleast 2" intake valves . As for the intake I'd probably just stay with the old style truck , off idle down low , you may be going backwards going to the TBSS.
Old 06-15-2020, 02:35 PM
  #5  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
TFA303's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 8
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by omc8
As for the intake I'd probably just stay with the old style truck , off idle down low , you may be going backwards going to the TBSS.
Interesting, thanks.
Old 06-15-2020, 02:43 PM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
 
Bspeck82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,734
Received 417 Likes on 302 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TFA303
Interesting, thanks.
the 799 heads are very good heads no need to swap them. The intake is also one of the best factory cathedral intakes on the market so it will he an excellent choice. No need to spend money to swap any of these. A good valve job and a small cam will really wake the truck up. Put a decent exhaust on it while you are at it and it will be a lot of fun to drive.
The following 2 users liked this post by Bspeck82:
NAVYBLUE210 (06-15-2020), TFA303 (06-15-2020)
Old 06-15-2020, 02:44 PM
  #7  
12 Second Club
 
Utinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 926
Likes: 0
Received 176 Likes on 129 Posts
Default

I would definitely use the 799's, and "de-shroud" the valves if possible. That would give you more flow at lower lifts, which is what you use the most of anyway. I don't think porting the 799 heads will add much benefit to your application. In stock form, they are good up to .550" lift. After that, they need porting. I wouldn't go past .550" lift on the cam. It wouldn't hurt, but that is getting into "race mode" territory. Being that this is a daily driver in a heavy SUV, I'd stick with a more conservative build. One of the truck cams (stage-2) in about a .550" lift would be great, and not need a higher stall converter.

The following users liked this post:
TFA303 (06-15-2020)
Old 06-15-2020, 03:30 PM
  #8  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
jlangley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Langley BC
Posts: 333
Received 72 Likes on 57 Posts
Default

Here is an interesting test on stock heads. Good argument to be made for 706 heads in a truck application.

The following 5 users liked this post by jlangley:
G Atsma (06-15-2020), Homer_Simpson (07-14-2022), Ls7colorado (06-21-2020), TFA303 (06-15-2020), Tuskyz28 (06-16-2020)
Old 06-15-2020, 10:09 PM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
CattleAc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Dakota Territory
Posts: 1,509
Received 320 Likes on 218 Posts

Default

I don't know if anyone has mentioned it, but one of the biggest improvements on these stock trucks is a decent tune...after you decide on what mods your going to do and implement them, make sure you know someone that can help you with that.
The following users liked this post:
TFA303 (06-16-2020)
Old 06-16-2020, 09:15 AM
  #10  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
TFA303's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 8
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by jlangley
Here is an interesting test on stock heads. Good argument to be made for 706 heads in a truck application.
Richard Holdener is a national treasure.
The following 3 users liked this post by TFA303:
G Atsma (06-16-2020), Jimbo1367 (06-25-2020), Ls7colorado (06-25-2020)
Old 06-19-2020, 03:07 PM
  #11  
Teching In
 
tallan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

did all 02+ have 317 heads?

any merit to porting the stockers?

everything I have read says tbss intake is way to go.

(looking to go down this route sooner than later)
Old 06-19-2020, 10:29 PM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
omc8's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: columbus,ohio
Posts: 1,539
Received 26 Likes on 22 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by tallan
did all 02+ have 317 heads?

any merit to porting the stockers?

everything I have read says tbss intake is way to go.

(looking to go down this route sooner than later)
1. No ...... also 035
2. Yes port them minimum get a good vj back cuts help low mid flow ideal TQ tow app
3. You haven't read everything start with this thread !
Old 06-19-2020, 11:42 PM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 21,153
Received 3,121 Likes on 2,434 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tallan
Everything I have read says tbss intake is way to go.

(looking to go down this route sooner than later)
See post #4 in this thread. Just read the WHOLE thread....
Old 06-21-2020, 02:05 PM
  #14  
Teching In
 
tallan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by G Atsma
See post #4 in this thread. Just read the WHOLE thread....
I was more talking about all the articles I read on the matter.
Old 06-22-2020, 10:26 AM
  #15  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
TFA303's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 8
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Thanks to all for the suggestions. I posted the same on another forum and got a lot of good advice, but that one resolved into "Just bolt on a blower and call it good", which I do admit is attractive, but I'm unconvinced that it's as affordable as the discussion indicated.

Have a great week, y'all.
Old 06-23-2020, 06:39 AM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Ls7colorado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Henderson, TN
Posts: 1,858
Received 450 Likes on 345 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TFA303
Thanks to all for the suggestions. I posted the same on another forum and got a lot of good advice, but that one resolved into "Just bolt on a blower and call it good", which I do admit is attractive, but I'm unconvinced that it's as affordable as the discussion indicated.

Have a great week, y'all.
a LSA would be perfect and give you WAY more power through the whole RPM range
Old 06-24-2020, 09:03 PM
  #17  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (40)
 
00pooterSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Dallas
Posts: 4,916
Received 524 Likes on 372 Posts

Default

You mentioned leaving the exhaust stock, because it's pretty good... The piping may be but the stock mufflers are terrible. I've had a few different exhaust setups on my current truck, two of them using stock mufflers. Both times I got rid of the stock muffler for a straight through magnaflow I saw a big increase in performance and MPG.

At minimum do a straight through muffler if you leave the exhaust stock.



Quick Reply: Help me plan my 6.0 refresh



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:46 PM.