Valve spring installed height HELP - TSP 2.5 LS6 heads
#1
Valve spring installed height HELP - TSP 2.5 LS6 heads
Trying to make sure my heights are correct. This is all new to me so bare with me.
The bottom shim/top hat is installed on these readings btw.
I have been told I should be subtracting .100 since the retainer is on the inside lip of the micrometer.
Anyways I am showing 1.880 for my installed height for multiple valves. Minus the .100 gives me 1.780 installed
If someone could point me in the right direction I’d appreciate it. Also I know I could shim to drop the height but how do I go about lifting it?
springs are calling for 1.810 installed height
The bottom shim/top hat is installed on these readings btw.
I have been told I should be subtracting .100 since the retainer is on the inside lip of the micrometer.
Anyways I am showing 1.880 for my installed height for multiple valves. Minus the .100 gives me 1.780 installed
If someone could point me in the right direction I’d appreciate it. Also I know I could shim to drop the height but how do I go about lifting it?
springs are calling for 1.810 installed height
Last edited by z28_YOU_HO; 05-18-2022 at 01:23 AM.
#2
I think the old school machinists way was to cut the spring pocket deeper until you achieved the desired spring height. I don't know that I've ever heard of anyone having to cut the pockets on LS heads though.. Maybe try a different set of springs?
#3
You can't go off of someones word that that step is 0.100", you MUST measure how deep that step is in the Mic. Just because a box of springs says 1.810" IH doesn't mean that is where it MUST be installed. We need way more info. What is the springs? How much valve lift, what will you be doing with the car, what rocker arms.....
The following 2 users liked this post by TurboBuick6:
Che70velle (05-19-2022), KCS (05-18-2022)
#4
You can't go off of someones word that that step is 0.100", you MUST measure how deep that step is in the Mic. Just because a box of springs says 1.810" IH doesn't mean that is where it MUST be installed. We need way more info. What is the springs? How much valve lift, what will you be doing with the car, what rocker arms.....
I had some pistons smack a couple valves. I am assuming valve springs were weak but I also want to make sure everything is in spec for when I get it put back together so I have no more issues.
the car has a tsp tsunami cam (235/240 .629 .615) with scorpion 1.7 rockers
this is just a street car I drive around quite often.
#6
TECH Enthusiast
I had some pistons smack a couple valves. I am assuming valve springs were weak but I also want to make sure everything is in spec for when I get it put back together so I have no more issues.
the car has a tsp tsunami cam (235/240 .629 .615) with scorpion 1.7 rockers
this is just a street car I drive around quite often.
the car has a tsp tsunami cam (235/240 .629 .615) with scorpion 1.7 rockers
this is just a street car I drive around quite often.
The following users liked this post:
G Atsma (05-21-2022)
The following users liked this post:
z28_YOU_HO (05-29-2022)
#10
TECH Enthusiast
Something I think a lot of people are forgetting is that installed height is to get the proper spring pressure. Whether you cut that spring pocket deeper, or even if you added .25" of shims, the actual position of the valve in the head has not changed; it is not any closer or further away from the piston - or the rocker arm, for that matter.
I always err on the tight side, because that spring is going to loosen up after the first few hours of operation. If you have access to a valve spring tester, you might be surprised how much a box of springs can vary.
I always err on the tight side, because that spring is going to loosen up after the first few hours of operation. If you have access to a valve spring tester, you might be surprised how much a box of springs can vary.
The following users liked this post:
z28_YOU_HO (05-29-2022)
#11
TECH Fanatic
Do you have the specs on the springs (spring rate, seat pressure at 1.810, and coil bind)? With you running 1.780 versus 1.810 just means you'll be running a touch more spring pressure and be .030" closer to coil bind. With those spring specs, it will be easy to calculate where you will be at with the new installed height.
If you want to raise the spring height, you can get valve locks that are advertised as "+0.xx," which means the locks will raise the spring height by that much. However, it has been my experience that you need to play around with those locks and retainers to get close to the height, because there is a tolerance that can push you too far in the opposite direction. But first, I would calculate where everything sits at the lower installed height and see if it even is an issue.
If you want to raise the spring height, you can get valve locks that are advertised as "+0.xx," which means the locks will raise the spring height by that much. However, it has been my experience that you need to play around with those locks and retainers to get close to the height, because there is a tolerance that can push you too far in the opposite direction. But first, I would calculate where everything sits at the lower installed height and see if it even is an issue.
The following users liked this post:
z28_YOU_HO (05-30-2022)
#12
Do you have the specs on the springs (spring rate, seat pressure at 1.810, and coil bind)? With you running 1.780 versus 1.810 just means you'll be running a touch more spring pressure and be .030" closer to coil bind. With those spring specs, it will be easy to calculate where you will be at with the new installed height.
If you want to raise the spring height, you can get valve locks that are advertised as "+0.xx," which means the locks will raise the spring height by that much. However, it has been my experience that you need to play around with those locks and retainers to get close to the height, because there is a tolerance that can push you too far in the opposite direction. But first, I would calculate where everything sits at the lower installed height and see if it even is an issue.
If you want to raise the spring height, you can get valve locks that are advertised as "+0.xx," which means the locks will raise the spring height by that much. However, it has been my experience that you need to play around with those locks and retainers to get close to the height, because there is a tolerance that can push you too far in the opposite direction. But first, I would calculate where everything sits at the lower installed height and see if it even is an issue.
#13
TECH Fanatic
If 1.780" is your verified measurement, I would roll with it.
The following users liked this post:
z28_YOU_HO (06-02-2022)