Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

400HP Build Strategy at Elevation - Mile High

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-15-2023, 09:09 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
TonyD87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2023
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 400HP Build Strategy at Elevation - Mile High

Hey All,

I’m planning an LS swap for my 944 Porsche and am trying to gauge whether I can meet my power goals here in Denver with no forced induction. If not, I may need to go with a different swap option.

Goal: 400WHP (944 drivetrain losses 16%)

What I’ll do with the car?: Full restore street car with some autocross.

Complications: Denver is a mile high with an estimated 8,000 - 9,000 density altitude during summer. Which means, we’re looking at roughly 30% power loss by default. Additionally, I don’t have much room for forces air and prefer NA to avoid added weight impacting the 50/50 weight distribution.

I’m hearing anecdotes from folks hitting 400 in Denver however I haven’t come across any specifics on build details for these motors. I’m curious if anyone has recent experience here and can provide guidance on how I can achieve success.

Thinking about this in a different way, should my goal post be 570WHP at sea level to identify a build that can achieve 400 at elevation? This feels like an oversimplification that may not be successful in practice.

Ive been focusing my researching on LS1 383 and LS2 408 motors. My suspicion is that I’ll need to start looking at a 7L to achieve my goals out here and if that’s the case, it may make more financial sense to look at my other swap options (2.5L VW).

Last edited by TonyD87; 01-15-2023 at 09:57 AM.
Old 01-15-2023, 01:36 PM
  #2  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
LS1Formulation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan
Posts: 2,791
Received 599 Likes on 474 Posts

Default

Here's what I would do: I'd go with a 402 LS2, more cubes = more power. You probably have 91 octane up there, not 93, but I'd bump the compression up to 12.5:1. There are guys getting away with 11.5:1 with LS engines at sea level, so I don't think 12.5:1 is excessive. I'd also spec out a cam with a significant amount of overlap, as the exhaust driven induction event will help fill the cylinders. The IVC event will be very important with this build, I would almost want to install an adjustable timing set in order to fine tune the IVC to get your cranking compression where it needs to be.
The following users liked this post:
G Atsma (01-15-2023)
Old 01-15-2023, 10:53 PM
  #3  
TECH Regular
 
Kawboom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 491
Received 568 Likes on 364 Posts
Default

One thing to remember is that you don't need more cam at altitude, you actually need a little less. In racing like Pro Stock they have smaller cams for high altitude racing. That doesn't mean don't put a healthy cam in it, but maybe go 230/240 instead of 240/250.
Old 01-15-2023, 11:01 PM
  #4  
Teching In
 
Cooter!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2022
Posts: 40
Received 20 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

I would buy/build a 650HP engine to make 400RWHP in Denver. That would be SUPER easy with a turbo, but you don't want one so an NA LS build will cost a bunch more but still totally do-able.

If you want to slap it together yourself, look at a company that makes one already like GMPP, Blueprint, etc and copy that recipe.

*Easy Button
Old 01-20-2023, 10:23 AM
  #5  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
.boB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 897
Received 33 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

The reason you lose power at altitude is because you lose cylinder pressure. If you increase your static compression to compensate, you're there. Calculate your dynamic compression to stay below 8.4'ish, and it will run like a banshee on pump fuel.

Also, because of the thin air, pay careful attention to quench.



Quick Reply: 400HP Build Strategy at Elevation - Mile High



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:14 PM.