Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

LS Crank ID

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-22-2023, 09:14 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
GMJim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default LS Crank ID

I have a 68 C10 with a Gen 3 LS engine in it and am trying to identify it. I used a bore scope to see It has dished pistons so I assumed it was a 5.3 but I recently dropped the pan and found a three digit casting number on one of the counter weights (482).




Is it typical to see this type of ID using 3 digits? 12553482 is a 4.8 crank. I was expecting to find a 7 or 8 digit casting number somewhere but this looks almost like a stamp. It would seem based on the info I have that my engine has a 4.8 crank with 5.3 dished pistons in it? Talk about low compression? Has anyone seen this type of ID and can confirm that this is a 4.8 crank.
Thanks

Last edited by GMJim; 02-22-2023 at 09:20 PM.
Old 02-22-2023, 11:14 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (16)
 
1FastBrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: JunkYard
Posts: 9,311
Received 432 Likes on 303 Posts

Default

That is a 4.8L crank. It will have a full set of raised digits on one of the weights.
Old 02-23-2023, 05:26 PM
  #3  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
GMJim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Kinda thought so. I didn't spin the crank over much after seeing this. Now I have to figure out why someone would use a 4.8 crank with 5.3 dished pistons? Turbo charging? Any idea what rods would be in there?
Thanks

Last edited by GMJim; 02-23-2023 at 09:34 PM.
Old 02-23-2023, 05:53 PM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (16)
 
1FastBrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: JunkYard
Posts: 9,311
Received 432 Likes on 303 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by GMJim
Kinda thought so. I didn't spin the crank over much after seeing this. Now I have to figure out why someone would use a 4.8 crank with 5.3 dished pistins? Turbo charging? Any idea what rods would be in there?
Thanks
Those are the early rods with the press pins.

I have no Idea why people do strange stuff like that.
I picked up an engine like that which someone mickey moussed back together and figured out that they weren't able to make it run because it had the wrong cam gear in it.
Old 02-23-2023, 09:28 PM
  #5  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
GMJim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Strange that this engine was rebuilt at a reputable shop (according to the previous owner) . All I can figure is the owner told the rebuilder that it was a 5.3 and he built it as such without checking the crank. You would think that when the flat top pistons were pulled out it would have been obvious to the rebuilder. The only mystery is the rods would have to have been changed or the pistons are low in the hole? Anyway I have a 4.8 with low compression that I want to fix. I guess new crank and rods?

Last edited by GMJim; 02-23-2023 at 09:41 PM.
Old 02-23-2023, 10:44 PM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
 
dixiebandit69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 650
Received 271 Likes on 204 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by GMJim
Anyway I have a 4.8 with low compression that I want to fix. I guess new crank and rods?
Hell, if you're going to do all that, just throw in the flat-top pistons as well.
Old 02-24-2023, 05:46 PM
  #7  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
GMJim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by dixiebandit69
Hell, if you're going to do all that, just throw in the flat-top pistons as well.
Not a bad idea! Any idea what the compression ratio would be? Would a stock tune work?

Last edited by GMJim; 02-24-2023 at 07:32 PM.
Old 02-26-2023, 07:06 PM
  #8  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
GMJim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Has anybody used flat top pistons in a 5.3? My engine is comming out soon to change the crank (4.8 to 5.3) and rods. The flat top pistons would increase comp ratio but to what? Any assistance appreciated.
Jim
Old 02-26-2023, 07:16 PM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (16)
 
1FastBrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: JunkYard
Posts: 9,311
Received 432 Likes on 303 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by GMJim
Has anybody used flat top pistons in a 5.3? My engine is comming out soon to change the crank (4.8 to 5.3) and rods. The flat top pistons would increase comp ratio but to what? Any assistance appreciated.
Jim
GM did it in the L33 5.3L And the LS4 as well.

But to be more direct. Yes I have done it on mine as well as a few freinds.
Old 02-26-2023, 08:39 PM
  #10  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
GMJim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1FastBrick
GM did it in the L33 5.3L And the LS4 as well.

But to be more direct. Yes I have done it on mine as well as a few freinds.
Thanks for the reply. Will it run properly on the stock LM7 tune?

Last edited by GMJim; 02-26-2023 at 09:39 PM.
Old 03-18-2023, 11:26 AM
  #11  
Launching!
 
LS299S10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: FL
Posts: 206
Received 74 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GMJim
Has anybody used flat top pistons in a 5.3? My engine is comming out soon to change the crank (4.8 to 5.3) and rods. The flat top pistons would increase comp ratio but to what? Any assistance appreciated.
Jim
GM did it with the LS4, LY5, LMG, LH6, LC9, LH8.
With 706 or 862 heads it should make around 10.5:1 compression with flat top pistons.



Quick Reply: LS Crank ID



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:09 AM.