Dynamic comp vs compression test gauge
When everyone has used online dynamic compression ratio calculator.
How accurate has it been to the actual compression test preformed on the engine after it was built?
Using Wallace racing calcs my static comp is 11.45 to 1 and my dynamic compression ratio is going to be 8.8 to 1.
I know people are going to freak out at the 8.8 to 1 and say it's too high for pump gas. But from what I'm reading online and test I've seen preformed online by repitable companies you can push upwards of 9.2 to 1 dynamic compression ratio and not have destination problems.
But away from that I want to see real world results between online calculators and actual compression test results.
Thanks in advance everyone.
Compression doesn't work that way. Most especially, because in an engine it's an adiabatic process (for practical purposes at hand, little enough heat escapes during the process for it to be negligible) rather than an isothermal process (gases are allowed to either heat up or cool down after the process is complete and before "measurement").
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adiabatic_process scroll down about a third of the way to "Example of adiabatic compression"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isothermal_process
Can't speak to "calculator". Just ... thermodynamics.
8.8 will be tough on pump gas. You'll probably have to back the timing WWWWAAAAAAAAAYYYYY back off of its correct "best HP" setting.
From my fiddling around though and what I have gathered a slightly lower compression engine with a very early IVC event will produce a stronger idle to mid-range response than a higher compression one with a later IVC
You can do the high compression and the super early IVC. Just run a milder timing table, If you dial in the tune during the hottest part of the year when it's the hottest outside in the intake, air temperatures are hot and horrible. You'll have a safe, high compression combo. You can drive all year
From my fiddling around though and what I have gathered a slightly lower compression engine with a very early IVC event will produce a stronger idle to mid-range response than a higher compression one with a later IVC
You can do the high compression and the super early IVC. Just run a milder timing table, If you dial in the tune during the hottest part of the year when it's the hottest outside in the intake, air temperatures are hot and horrible. You'll have a safe, high compression combo. You can drive all year
The engine isn't built yet so I still have the option to use larger combustion chamber heads to drop the static compression ratio lower to lower the dynamic compression ratio aswell.
But I Wanted to see how accurate the online calculators are compared to the actual real world test results.
Mine is as follows.
3.903 bore
3.622 stroke
66cc chamber
6.3 inch rod
.040 gasket
0 altitude
0 boost
Cam is a comp cam 54 458 11 valve closing at 67.5@ .006 so add 1 degree give 68.5 ABDC
shitty memory....
4.00 bore
3.622 stroke
6.098 rod
60.2 cc chambers
.041 Head gaskets
11:03 SC according to Summits calculator
summit 8710 cam. 69 degree IVC
Trending Topics
gasket bore diameter of 4.060.
Also the timing of your inlet valve isn't correct.
it works out to be 73 degrees unless it is advanced 4 degrees to give 69 degrees ABDC.
with the static compression you said 11.03 and cam ivc at 69 abc I get 8.48 or 176.46 psi.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
4 inch bore
3.622 stroke
60.2 cc chamber
7.1cc dish piston
4.010 gasket bore
.041 gasket thickness
0 altitude
0 boost
with that compression ratio and cam at 3 degrees advanced ivc at 70 degrees the dynamic compression ratio works out to be
8.25 to 1 or 170psi.
With my pistons out of the hole are you using a negative number -.006 for deck clearance. Anyway there are many internet calculators that do give slightly different results. Some are more trusted than others.
Hopefully others will jump in and give their results to help answer your original question.
With my pistons out of the hole are you using a negative number -.006 for deck clearance. Anyway there are many internet calculators that do give slightly different results. Some are more trusted than others.
Hopefully others will jump in and give their results to help answer your original question.
Works out at 11.01 to 1 and dynamic 8.46 or 175 psi
If so what do they say it should be as opposed to what you have on a compression test gauge???
Even after the engine had minimal run time, it also had very equal leakdown readings. Do I trust the actual %, not really but as a comparison between cylinders, I feel it provides a good basis to locating issues like a valve that is not sealing correctly, cracked ring, etc on an engine that has been in service for a while or a fresh build.
Even after the engine had minimal run time, it also had very equal leakdown readings. Do I trust the actual %, not really but as a comparison between cylinders, I feel it provides a good basis to locating issues like a valve that is not sealing correctly, cracked ring, etc on an engine that has been in service for a while or a fresh build.









