LS6 heads on a 2004 6.0
So my question is what would the compression ratio be with the LS6 heads on the 6.0?
Bore wise I hoping maybe 10 over and maybe up to 30 over.
Not looking for big HP numbers but an engine that will typically run on 91 octane and in a pinch 87 octane.
So since it's a bit of bench racing now and I know it would cost a bit more how about an iron block 5.3 bored and stroked to 383 cubes and then adding the LS6 heads?
Bore wise I hoping maybe 10 over and maybe up to 30 over.
Not looking for big HP numbers but an engine that will typically run on 91 octane and in a pinch 87 octane.
So since it's a bit of bench racing now and I know it would cost a bit more how about an iron block 5.3 bored and stroked to 383 cubes and then adding the LS6 heads?
The LS2 is basically an aluminum LQ9 with 243/799 heads and the addition of AFM. Its compression is essentially the same as what you'd end up with in your combo. It's just under 11:1 from the factory so that's what you should expect. If you put those heads on a LQ4 you'll end up with something mid 10s, maybe 10.5 or so.
Frankly, sounds to me like if you got a "clean 100K 6.0 core", you'd be many many $$$$$ ahead to just leave the short block alone. Most likely doesn't need bearings, boring, and all that. Maybe change out the oil pump and timing chain as part of a cam swap. For $300 I'd think it's more likely the LQ4, butt who knows.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Yes if the 6.0 didn't need boring that would fantastic. But because I'm paranoid (since the whole world is out to get me) LOL I will pull the engine apart to check all clearances.
The LS6 in my Wrangler runs great. No issues but a somewhat low mileage 6.0 would be hard to pass up.
Thanks for all the suggestions.











