This dyno seem low to anyone else? -TR 230
-Home P&P heads, milled .0030, 10.8 c/r
-TR 230/224, comp 918 springs
-LT FLP's, no cats, cutout before axle
-LS6 Intake
-Home P&P TB
-160 degree thermostat
-SPEC Stage 3 carbon clutch
-Stock rear, 3.73's
-Heavy Chrome 18x10.5 ZO6 rims, 295/35 BFG's
Does this sound about right? I thought 400rwhp was good with stock heads. Someone pretty deep in the LS1 business said that 1pt. in compression is generally worth 15 rwhp once tuned. Personally, that sounds kind of high to me. From what I've heard and seen, about 10rwhp is the norm. Anyway, I was thinking somewhere in the 425rwhp range would have been more appropriate considering his bump in compression, cam, and stock rear. He originally dynoed 315rwhp with lid, cutout, 3.73's and stock 16's. I beleive his base run before tuning was close to 400rwhp.
<small>[ March 25, 2003, 02:25 AM: Message edited by: SStolen ]</small>
But yeah, for a H/C car, that does sound kinda low, but take dyno numbers with a grain of salt.
409 rwhp is not bad, esepcially if the "home ported" heads are stock valved. TR230's dyno 375-380 rwhp in Georgia with stock heads, so 409 rwhp would be respectable.
josh
Also, I'd imagine there's about an even trade off in power with the raised compression and the size/weight of the wheels.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
<strong> Let me rephrase and clarify on the heads. They are not 'home' ported. They were actually done by a racing company. They have done hundreds of LS1 heads so they know what they are doing. They only charge $600 for the porting/milling using stock valves and generally show an increase of 17-23rwhp over stock heads and compression. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">That is a very weak gain even for stock valves. Sounds like your friend should have just spent the cash on a set of TEAs or something and not made the mistake of doing something half-***.
<strong> Gotta cut corners when you can. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Cylinder heads are not the place you want to cut corners on. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />
All in all, I do think the overall numbers are a bit low. However, I don't think they are as far off as you might think. Does the car have an ASP pulley,etc?
Jason
<strong> Gotta cut corners when you can. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">That's understandable and sometimes it has to happen to fit a budget. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Frown]" src="gr_sad.gif" /> But when you do cut corners don't <img border="0" alt="[cry]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_cry.gif" /> when you don't get the same results of people that didn't cut corners. For what's done to the car I think your buddy's numbers are not not too bad, for someone that had to cut corners. The numbers are not the greatest, but they are not bad.
Paul
http://home.attbi.com/~nickn20/422rwhp.jpg
stock rear end 6 speed car. so the 373s might kill 5 but I left some HP on the A/F didn't have time to finish the tune.
The car is very quick at the track though 11.3 at over 120mph. Dyno does not tell the entire story all the time.
<strong> Looks pretty good to me, put the stock wheels pack on and get a pulley and see what happenes. Also what was the weather like when you dynoed. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">What would a pulley be worth, HP wise? And what type of pulley?





