New HPE "S" cam!
Originally Posted by algws6
how is the driveability?
Chuck
any particular goal or plan with this setup or were you guys just testing **** out? tq looks good 350rwtq from 3500-6300 and hp peak isnt too high. how high would you recommend spinning and shifting this setup.
FormerVendor
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,065
Likes: 6
From: Houston, Tx.
Originally Posted by jrp
any particular goal or plan with this setup or were you guys just testing **** out? tq looks good 350rwtq from 3500-6300 and hp peak isnt too high. how high would you recommend spinning and shifting this setup.
Well pretty much trying to look at getting something more on stuff with dead stock heads and shortblocks with NO mods as far as having to go with the stock pistons. P to V is where most of the problems lie and then you have to test it out. I'd probably shift it around 6800-6900 since it pulls through there still making 420. The graph when you show both TQ and power has a glitch. I'll try and post another pic off of my Dynojet file viewer for Chuck.
Originally Posted by racer7088
No but it took quite a bit of research to fit everything in and NASA engineering and various NASCAR engine builders were consulted as well as all the top guys in F1 so I think it's a bargain! The truth is also tiny changes may be made as to updating the profiles vs springs etc and we need to protect the time we have in this stuff. Or anyone else can get some springs and cams and start measuring and running stuff on the dyno and street and then after quite a bit of time you'll know what you want too! Just joking but it takes more work then some know to make sure this stuff works (the specs are easy to come up with but that isn't 10 percent of making sure it will work) when you are pushing the limits as far as P to V or valve float etc. In the end people cam measure ANY of these cams anyway if they know what they are doing. You can figure out the recipe to coke and make your own too if you really wanted to and you'd save tons and tons of money. 
Get ready for the "no specs" bashers. This is the same reason Ive been preaching as to why LG wont give up the specs on their cam(s).
Sounds like a killer setup!
FormerVendor
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,065
Likes: 6
From: Houston, Tx.
Originally Posted by -=Merlin=-
So then this cam was designed to work specifically with a stock internal cars with bolt-ons, correct?
Very nice power.
Very nice power.
FormerVendor
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,065
Likes: 6
From: Houston, Tx.
Originally Posted by Country Boy
Get ready for the "no specs" bashers. This is the same reason Ive been preaching as to why LG wont give up the specs on their cam(s).
Sounds like a killer setup!
Sounds like a killer setup!
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Gas Monkey Built a 6-Wheel Ferrari Testarossa With a Corvette LT4 Engine
Verdad Gallardo
7 Most Reliable High-Performance Engines GM Has Ever Built
Verdad Gallardo
Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin
Verdad Gallardo
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes
Verdad Gallardo
Originally Posted by kickassT/A
HPE is trying ot be another LG huh.
if he gave u the specs u could just call up anywhere and get a custom cam made so what would be the point of him having his own cam?
Why would it make more power on a 01-02 car? You've already changed out the 3 things that improved over the model run...intake, headers and cam. Asides from that, very good numbers!
Could he just post the lift numbers to the nearest hundredth, and a range for duration. Or better yet the total amount of overlap at .050" so that we can figure out if it has any chance at passing smog?
Originally Posted by Trojan T/A
Could he just post the lift numbers to the nearest hundredth, and a range for duration. Or better yet the total amount of overlap at .050" so that we can figure out if it has any chance at passing smog?
Originally Posted by ninobrn99
lets say with on 99 m6 ta with pacesetters w/ cattedY hooker catback, lid, pullies, and a few more little free mods should expect with this cam set up?
So that would be the limiting factor. But I'd say realistically around 375ish.Chuck
Originally Posted by Benjamin Russick
Why would it make more power on a 01-02 car? You've already changed out the 3 things that improved over the model run...intake, headers and cam. Asides from that, very good numbers!
Chuck
Originally Posted by FASTONE
Those are great numbers for stock heads, love to see it with ported heads.And with a wide 115 LDA,Hummmm????? 
Chuck