BIGBOS

What are the exact specs of the cam??

I wonder if this cam would make a good blower cam....on a 114lsa... <img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="images/icons/confused.gif" />

Bad Habit Bird

iTrader: (12)

What did you dyno before the cam went in?

LG - How would this cam work out with a 114 lobe on it? If it made similar power in a usable range You would have another buyer right here <img border="0" alt="[evil]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_devil.gif" />

2MCHPWR

iTrader: (10)

97 mph in the 1/8th is insane <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="gr_eek2.gif" />
congrats!!!!!!!

JS12

the car made 356/372 before the cam, raceweight was 3480. i drive it everyday, i drove it all the way to houston ro race this weekend. every bolt on but lacking a lot of suspension. idle it at 950 and boy does it sound good. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />

jmX

DAMN! <img border="0" title="" alt="[Cool]" src="gr_images/icons/cool.gif" />

JS12

dont really know the low end torque, i launch at 6k and anytime i get on it i am at 4k+. the specs are 232 240 595 609 112ls.

Jason99T/A

iTrader: (21)

Excellent #s! <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="gr_eek2.gif" />

LSs1Power

iTrader: (5)

G2 LS1, Im going to be the third guy to ask u how will this cam work(Better Ideal, better with NOS, FI) if its 114? If u do have the same cam in 114 i will be inline for one.

Godspeed

JS, great #'s. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Cool]" src="gr_images/icons/cool.gif" />

LG Motorsports

Without trying a cam on a 114lc I couldn't tell you exactly how much power it would have, but the idle quality would be better. Personally I like the lope. The torque curve would be shifted, but the torque numbers should be roughly the same.
NOS and forced induction would also benefit from the 114. Also keep in mind that this is a traditional split cam, so it is already a good cam for forced induction and nos.

There would also be less of an issue with the P/V clearance with a 114.

Hope this helps.

Lou G

<small>[ April 02, 2003, 05:33 PM: Message edited by: LG Motorsports ]</small>

LSs1Power

iTrader: (5)

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by LG Motorsports:
<strong> Without trying a cam on a 114lc I couldn't tell you exactly how much power it would have, but the idle quality would be better. Personally I like the lope. The torque curve would be shifted, but the torque numbers should be roughly the same.
NOS and forced induction would also benefit from the 114. Also keep in mind that this is a traditional split cam, so it is already a good cam for forced induction and nos.

There would also be less of an issue with the P/V clearance with a 114.

Hope this helps.

Lou G </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">So are u guys planning of making the same cam with 114? If not can u make me a custom one(Willing to test it on my car)?

<small>[ April 02, 2003, 06:03 PM: Message edited by: LSs1Power ]</small>

LG Motorsports

If you want a 114, we can do it no problem. If you are the first one to do it, I will pay the shipping for your cam. but only if you are the first one that we do.

You will have to call me direct to get this deal.

thanks
Lou G

Bad Habit Bird

iTrader: (12)

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by LG Motorsports:
<strong> Without trying a cam on a 114lc I couldn't tell you exactly how much power it would have, but the idle quality would be better. Personally I like the lope. The torque curve would be shifted, but the torque numbers should be roughly the same.
NOS and forced induction would also benefit from the 114. Also keep in mind that this is a traditional split cam, so it is already a good cam for forced induction and nos.

There would also be less of an issue with the P/V clearance with a 114.

Hope this helps.

Lou G </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Sweet! I think I will DEFINATLY be looking into this setup soon, the ONLY thing I didnt care for about this cam was the 112 lobe since I will be spraying a lot <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />

LSs1Power

iTrader: (5)

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by LG Motorsports:
<strong> If you want a 114, we can do it no problem. If you are the first one to do it, I will pay the shipping for your cam. but only if you are the first one that we do.

You will have to call me direct to get this deal.

thanks
Lou G </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Ok great.... I'm out of the country now.. will be in the U.S in 2 weeks or so. I will give u a call then lou and do this cam. I hope i will be the first <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" /> . Thank you.

Speed Demon

iTrader: (14)

What valve springs are used with that cam?

zdawg28

iTrader: (2)

Which springs would be the best to run with this cam? Would 4.10's be enough gear for this cam with 26" tires?

KL20

iTrader: (18)

this is JS12. i am using the REV double springs. at 6800rpms you can trap up tp 128 with 4.10s and 26s.

LS1derfull

Are you running valve reliefs with this cam? Im confused <img border="0" title="" alt="[Roll Eyes]" src="images/icons/rolleyes.gif" />

KL20

iTrader: (18)

all we did was slide the cam in. heads never off pistons never touched.


JS12

redz_02

iTrader: (4)

this just shows you how awsome these ls1 heads are from the factory.