Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Revving to 14,000 rpms?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-12-2004, 02:08 PM
  #21  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
NOBR8KSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Formula 1 cars rev that high and higher...close to 20,000 rpm. You will need a full roller bearing crank and cam, precision balanced and extremely lightweight everything, some kind of valvespring I have never seen, a big pocketbook, and big *****.
Old 10-12-2004, 02:14 PM
  #22  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (11)
 
maddboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Elmhurst, IL
Posts: 4,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ls1290
With fully forged internals, 3.25" stroke crank, 6.2" rods, titaninum valves, Comp Cam 978 dual springs, solid roller cam and rockers arms, I think you could hit 9500 rpms pretty easy.
Yea but will it stay together?
Old 10-12-2004, 02:29 PM
  #23  
6600 rpm clutch dump of death Administrator
 
J-Rod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,983
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Piston speed is the big thing

If you look at an F1 motor and a Nascar motor, the piston speed of the two motors is the same, but the RPMS are double on an F1 motor. F1 motors idle at 7000RPM redline at 19.5K.

To reach that RPM you will need to destroke the motor to a super short stroke (along with a lot of other details I won't cover).

So, you need SUPER lightweight parts. and you need a ports/valvetrain/camshaft that can move the air in properly controlled fashion. The question becomes why then. At the spped you are talking about you are going to spend a lot mf money trying to keep the valvetrain and the motor itself together.

The answer is you could. But the reality is it would cost more than it would ever be worth.
Old 10-12-2004, 02:48 PM
  #24  
12 Second Club
 
jermstyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Here is how you do it...

Buy formula 1 engine, install LS1 emblem.

Like some have said, he can be done, but it would cost soooo much.
Old 10-12-2004, 03:02 PM
  #25  
10 Second Club + 14 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (3)
 
antz01ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ne Pa
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by maddboost
Why not have a car that does the dishes? Ill tell you why cause its a stupid ******* idea.
Old 10-12-2004, 03:32 PM
  #26  
Teching In
 
bdaztrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

just get a turbo....it does tens of thousands of rpm
Old 10-12-2004, 04:14 PM
  #27  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Dole_Pineapple's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Your front yard.
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I guess I asked a question too advanced for a few of the under evolved memebers maybe thats why I keep getting laughed at. Does anyone remember everyone said man would never fly? Whats so bad about trying something different? If everyone had the same mind and same goals in life I think it would be rather boring. We wouldn't even be driving, we would all be pushing rocks around still, and saying things like unga bunga.
Old 10-12-2004, 04:29 PM
  #28  
TECH Fanatic
 
slyws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: "Tr"Asheville
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok the main set back for the standard gas powered engine as it sits in an everyday car is the valvetrain. The valvetrain is the first thing to really go out the door when revving to high. Something in it is going to let go. So step 1, eliminate your standard valvetrain.... and how do you do this you might ask? hehe.... follow the link here and you shall find the answer to some of your questions...

http://www.coatesengine.com/

-Sly
Old 10-12-2004, 04:31 PM
  #29  
TECH Fanatic
 
slyws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: "Tr"Asheville
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

"...The maximum RPMs on the poppet valve engine were 5700 RPMs; the
Spherical Rotary Valve Engine in comparison reached 14,850 RPM's..."



-Sly
Old 10-12-2004, 04:44 PM
  #30  
TECH Addict
 
technical's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Fat Chance Hotel
Posts: 2,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Dole_Pineapple
I guess I asked a question too advanced for a few of the under evolved memebers maybe thats why I keep getting laughed at. Does anyone remember everyone said man would never fly? Whats so bad about trying something different? If everyone had the same mind and same goals in life I think it would be rather boring. We wouldn't even be driving, we would all be pushing rocks around still, and saying things like unga bunga.
Trying to make an LS1 turn 14K rpms is analogous to using the wrong tool for the job. You should list your requirements. If an LS1 and 14k are both on that list...re-do the list.

The LS1 was designed for specific goals. Your goal of 14k is well beyond the original design of the gen III. Then we start talking about whether the trans can hold it, or the clutch... At least choose an OHC engine, or more appropriately a rotary.

If you want to design a 346ci engine that can turn rpms like a F1 motor, that's great. But don't start with the wrong platform, because that's starting from a negative position.
Old 10-12-2004, 05:39 PM
  #31  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
rons 00z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: omaha, NE
Posts: 1,004
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by technical
Trying to make an LS1 turn 14K rpms is analogous to using the wrong tool for the job. You should list your requirements. If an LS1 and 14k are both on that list...re-do the list.

The LS1 was designed for specific goals. Your goal of 14k is well beyond the original design of the gen III. Then we start talking about whether the trans can hold it, or the clutch... At least choose an OHC engine, or more appropriately a rotary.

If you want to design a 346ci engine that can turn rpms like a F1 motor, that's great. But don't start with the wrong platform, because that's starting from a negative position.
same reason why we dont biuld mustangs we want to go fast i think with the stuff out today 8.5 9k rpm sounds more possible
Old 10-12-2004, 05:45 PM
  #32  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
cyphur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: North Texas
Posts: 8,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by technical
Trying to make an LS1 turn 14K rpms is analogous to using the wrong tool for the job. You should list your requirements. If an LS1 and 14k are both on that list...re-do the list.

The LS1 was designed for specific goals. Your goal of 14k is well beyond the original design of the gen III. Then we start talking about whether the trans can hold it, or the clutch... At least choose an OHC engine, or more appropriately a rotary.

If you want to design a 346ci engine that can turn rpms like a F1 motor, that's great. But don't start with the wrong platform, because that's starting from a negative position.


buy an F1 car.
Old 10-12-2004, 06:29 PM
  #33  
TECH Fanatic
 
pimpmaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Instead of trying to make a huge jump to 14k, you might be more successful by attempting smaller, incremental rev limit increases.
Old 10-12-2004, 07:00 PM
  #34  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
crainholio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,977
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Dole_Pineapple
I guess I asked a question too advanced for a few of the under evolved memebers maybe thats why I keep getting laughed at. Does anyone remember everyone said man would never fly? Whats so bad about trying something different? If everyone had the same mind and same goals in life I think it would be rather boring. We wouldn't even be driving, we would all be pushing rocks around still, and saying things like unga bunga.
The cold hard facts about the question you posed are:

1.) Engines can be made to spin 14,000 and up RPM, nothing novel, advanced, or imaginative there.
2.) It costs a lot of money to do it reliably.
3.) Most of us, including you, can't afford it.

No amount of imagination is going to change the forces acting on a connecting rod and wrist pin at high speeds.

If we all wasted our time re-proving what's already been proven...repeatedly...we'd all still be living in caves wondering why our rock-wheeled cars won't spin to 14,000 rpm. Or, like the French and German engineers trying to figure out why their planes wouldn't fly...reproving that their math was wrong. (same weenies who told Orville and Wilbur Wright that their plane wouldn't fly)

Now go think up something really revolutionary, that's never been done but has a tiny glimmer of possibility, and have a go at it.

Until then, unga bunga from one of the many people who have already forgotten more about internal combustion engines than you presently know.
Old 10-12-2004, 08:32 PM
  #35  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
GMCtrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 9,853
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by J-Rod
Piston speed is the big thing
exactly. F1's pistons spin at roughly the same speed as your everyday car motor
Old 10-12-2004, 09:17 PM
  #36  
Launching!
 
Blue Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Trois-Rivières (Québec / Canada)
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Dole_Pineapple
I guess I asked a question too advanced for a few of the under evolved memebers maybe thats why I keep getting laughed at. Does anyone remember everyone said man would never fly? Whats so bad about trying something different? If everyone had the same mind and same goals in life I think it would be rather boring. We wouldn't even be driving, we would all be pushing rocks around still, and saying things like unga bunga.
Yeah! But the Wright brothers didn't try to reach the moon at their first attempt with the Flyer.

"One step at the time", That's the only logical way to progress in my book.
Old 10-12-2004, 09:24 PM
  #37  
Launching!
 
Grant B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Gainesville, Florida
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Here ya go:
http://www.race-cars.com/engsold/cos...1/dfrx01ss.htm
http://www.race-cars.com/engsold/cos...77724596ss.htm (1.5L 750-1000hp)
Old 10-12-2004, 11:39 PM
  #38  
TECH Apprentice
 
mnc2886's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm not saying it can't be done, but other than the sake of being different, why?
Old 10-13-2004, 03:44 AM
  #39  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Dole_Pineapple's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Your front yard.
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=crainholio]The cold hard facts about the question you posed are:

1.) Engines can be made to spin 14,000 and up RPM, nothing novel, advanced, or imaginative there.
2.) It costs a lot of money to do it reliably.


3.) Most of us, including you, can't afford it.



Wondering where you came up with that last conclusion.
Old 10-13-2004, 04:11 AM
  #40  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
DaleMX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Atlanta, Georgia!
Posts: 3,078
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Cut the stroke in half, get rid of the pushrods and go with overhead, Use 400 lb springs, hog out the heads beyond belief, bring the CR up to 14:1....



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:48 PM.