Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

What is acceptible Engine Mileage?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-26-2004, 02:57 PM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
Stu Cool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Olivehurst, CA
Posts: 1,457
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Question What is acceptible Engine Mileage?

I am considering a swap into my '53 Studebaker (it has a 350 SBC now)and have started looking around for engines and automatic transmissions. I understand that the Gen III smallblocks are designed and expected to last a lot of miles. Some how I still have problems accepting claims that 79k is low mileage

The mileage obviously affects the price, so how much weight do I give to engine mileage? The car this motor will be swapped into is only driven about 3000 miles a year. The motor may see some performance mods, but not for serious racing. I will take the car on some trips so reliability is important to me.

All that being asked, what are the weak points and parts that show wear? Are there motors that are more desirable or ones to be avoided? How about the Automatic transmissions? Do they last as well as the motors? Do they perform well stock or do they need to be modified for performance street use?

I have got books coming to help with my education so I won't have to be asking everything, I really appreciate your sharing experience and knowledge

Pat
Old 12-26-2004, 03:09 PM
  #2  
jrp
SN95 Director
iTrader: (16)
 
jrp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Valencia, Ca
Posts: 10,755
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

its not so much mileage as it is the type of mileage and the conditions they were in. would you rather have a 70k mile motor thats been babied, oil changed regularly, still has good compression and no blow by. or a 20k mile thats been beat to ****, not serviced, had tanks of n2o run through it, and burns oil?

click the FAQ in my sig, its got all the basic ls1 info you want/need (engine wise). the 4l60e is a pretty stout tranny, i'd wager you'd have no problems with basic bolt on mods. what rear end are you going to use?
Old 12-26-2004, 05:40 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
Stu Cool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Olivehurst, CA
Posts: 1,457
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Thumbs up WOW!! What a FAQ!

That is really some great stuff, read most of the ones that are of interest to me now, kept me busy for a hour or two. I understand the concept of how a motor was treated and maintained. Where I'm coming from is given similar conditions, how worn out is a 70, 90, 110k motor? Again I realize these things are in factory high performance cars and people are going to drive them, also the ones available have probably been wrecked. Let me simplify my question. For my car and application would a 80-90k motor with good compression be a safe bet? Also what usually goes first in these motors? Valves, rings, bearings, or whatever? How many miles do some of you folks have on your rides?

Now for my rear-end, it currently has an 8 inch Ford, 28 spline axles from a Maverick. Chosen for its stock narrow width. It has 2.79 gears, non-posi at the moment. One of my upgrades will be lower gears and a limited slip. My pre-LS1 plan was to go to 3.80 gears with an overdrive automatic. My tires are pretty tall by your standards, 29", so the 3.80s would be comparable to 3.55 or 3.42 with shorter tires. Given the overdrive and the limited miles I drive I could even go to 4.11. While the 8" Ford is not bullet proof I believe it to be at least as strong as the stock Z-28 rear-end. Given my intended use it should hold up. If I start breaking it, well then hello 9 inch.

Thanks again for the good info and for your work on that FAQ

Pat
Old 12-26-2004, 05:52 PM
  #4  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
LS1_PNYTAMR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,627
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

if its a modded motor and the trans hasn't been rebuilt expect problems if its had n2o tq pushed thru it... the 3-4 clutch is the weakpoint in the trans.. the ls1/ls6 motors imo are the stoutest ive ever seen to come off an assembly line compared to other new motors rolling off.. ive sprayed mine so many times i cant even guess... but it runs as strong or stronger then it ever has at 40k... but ive had 2 trans problems already out of it!
Old 12-26-2004, 05:57 PM
  #5  
jrp
SN95 Director
iTrader: (16)
 
jrp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Valencia, Ca
Posts: 10,755
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Stu Cool
That is really some great stuff, read most of the ones that are of interest to me now, kept me busy for a hour or two. I understand the concept of how a motor was treated and maintained. Where I'm coming from is given similar conditions, how worn out is a 70, 90, 110k motor? Again I realize these things are in factory high performance cars and people are going to drive them, also the ones available have probably been wrecked. Let me simplify my question. For my car and application would a 80-90k motor with good compression be a safe bet? Also what usually goes first in these motors? Valves, rings, bearings, or whatever? How many miles do some of you folks have on your rides?

Now for my rear-end, it currently has an 8 inch Ford, 28 spline axles from a Maverick. Chosen for its stock narrow width. It has 2.79 gears, non-posi at the moment. One of my upgrades will be lower gears and a limited slip. My pre-LS1 plan was to go to 3.80 gears with an overdrive automatic. My tires are pretty tall by your standards, 29", so the 3.80s would be comparable to 3.55 or 3.42 with shorter tires. Given the overdrive and the limited miles I drive I could even go to 4.11. While the 8" Ford is not bullet proof I believe it to be at least as strong as the stock Z-28 rear-end. Given my intended use it should hold up. If I start breaking it, well then hello 9 inch.

Thanks again for the good info and for your work on that FAQ

Pat
for your intent and application is see no problem with high mileage motor if it has good compression and passes a leak down test. beyond oil consumption from a convoluted pcv system the ls1 doesnt have many inherent problems. i bought my car with 93k miles on it and put lid, headers, exhaust and had no problems. its when i got into the big stuff; h/c/i that i found my motor wasnt in as good condition as i thought. after tear down and looking at the rest of the car it had been beaten on. but no mind as i've now got a forged 347 going in . rod bolts on the 98-99 and early 00's are a weak point but since you said you dont drag race or plan for big mods or RPM i dont see that being a problem. mechanical overreving and bending pushrods is also common (m6) but thats more of driver error and since your going with the auto i dont see that as a problem either.

just about anything is better then the GM 10 bolt , as you said, given your intention the 8" should hold up.

Glad you liked the FAQ
Old 12-26-2004, 05:58 PM
  #6  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (16)
 
fast98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: michigan
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i will be putting a cam in it this coming up week, i'm just gunna compression test it and then do a leak down and if all is good i will go ahead with my plans

Last edited by fast98; 08-20-2006 at 10:34 AM.
Old 12-26-2004, 06:03 PM
  #7  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Grimes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 2,636
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

well, some motors have problems with oil consumption. I'd look at the valve seals and rings. Otherwise the ls1 is a pretty stout motor.
Old 12-26-2004, 07:21 PM
  #8  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (54)
 
floman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Bridge City,Tx
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

My car has 117K miles on it now. No problems with it except for altenator and water pump. Mechanically its great, does'nt use any oil between changes. Runs very decent for the mods done and still gets 20 plus mpg.
Old 12-26-2004, 07:55 PM
  #9  
Launching!
 
apexman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: McKinney
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I just put a heads and cam package in my 70k motor in the Vette and just got back from diving it 1600 miles. It got 27 to 30 MPG and no oil consumtion. Oh, on the stock tune as well and it screams!

Derek
Old 12-27-2004, 11:04 AM
  #10  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
GuitsBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 6,249
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Ive put 64K miles on my car in exactly 2 years, since I bought it new. The car runs as smooth at idle as it did when it was new, it still burns no oil, cold piston slap is the same as it was since new, which is normal. The engine has held up perfectly against all types of stupidity and the abuse of learning myself and teaching others to drive m6. I put alot of highway miles, But I would say that I get on her (~5-6K RPM) atleast once every 10 to 20 miles of highway. I dont speed much, but I do like to get on it in the low gears. You can probably gauge my driving style by my tires. I got 25K out of my last set of bfg kdws, worn down to the wear indicators. As long as the engine wasnt neglected, I wouldnt hesitate to buy a motor with 80K on it. Its the car around the motor that tends to fall apart.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:26 AM.