GM versus Aftermarket head gasket
#1
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Is the price difference in the GM MLS verus Cometic due to the choices Cometic gives you in thickness and bore? Is there anything else or any other reason to choose Cometic over the GM MLS?
I will have a 3.905 bore. Will I need the Cometic or can I go with the GM MLS?
I will have a 3.905 bore. Will I need the Cometic or can I go with the GM MLS?
#7
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The GM MLS gaskets are not only the best, but also the cheapest.
Also, stating arbitrarilly they are too thick without asking the application is silly.
And, to boot..The stock 5.7GM MLS gaskest from summit..a woppin $25 a pair..hard to beat..and they will fit a 3.905 all day long. If your using 6.0L heads then go with the 6.0L 4" bore gaskets.
Dave
Also, stating arbitrarilly they are too thick without asking the application is silly.
And, to boot..The stock 5.7GM MLS gaskest from summit..a woppin $25 a pair..hard to beat..and they will fit a 3.905 all day long. If your using 6.0L heads then go with the 6.0L 4" bore gaskets.
Dave
Trending Topics
#9
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Is the GM reusable? If it is not then that would negate the price advantange over time.
Until I get all the parts and get it together I won't know what I will need for thickness. I am hoping I can get away with GM gaskets.
Until I get all the parts and get it together I won't know what I will need for thickness. I am hoping I can get away with GM gaskets.
#10
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Well, there is no need to ask the application when you are talking about a gasket that is .064" thick, or even .054". I'm not even talking about bore size, I'm talking about thicness and setting a quench height. In a traditional motor you want .035-.040 between the deck of your head and the top of the piston at TDC. In this case, a .064 or .054 gasket will not get you the quench area you want. The only place that makes the proper gasket is Cometic at .045" or .040" depending on your piston out of hole height.
#11
11 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Assuming most of our pistons are out of the bore by .008;
GM .054 - .008 = .046
Cometic .045 - .008 = .037
I'm told .040 is ideal for our motors with non forged parts. and .035 is too close. So will .006 make THAT much difference in power and/or detonation?
If it's not drastic wouldn't it be better to use the much cheaper GM gaskets and have the .006 as a safety margin?
GM .054 - .008 = .046
Cometic .045 - .008 = .037
I'm told .040 is ideal for our motors with non forged parts. and .035 is too close. So will .006 make THAT much difference in power and/or detonation?
If it's not drastic wouldn't it be better to use the much cheaper GM gaskets and have the .006 as a safety margin?
#13
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
.035" isn't to close. Anything below that is getting to close. Some people actually prefer .032-.033 on stock short blocks, but that IMO is pushing it. .035-.040 is ideal for these motors, but .035 is going to provide more power than .040. You have that range because not every motor has the same deck height. So, when you buy a gasket, you try to get it within that margin. If cost is your major concern, then get the GM MLS. If your more worried about your motor being set-up to be efficent, then spend the extra $. Contact some of our sponsors. I found some willing to sell the Cometics for $52 a piece.
#14
SN95 Director
iTrader: (16)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Beast96Z
.035" isn't to close. Anything below that is getting to close. Some people actually prefer .032-.033 on stock short blocks, but that IMO is pushing it. .035-.040 is ideal for these motors, but .035 is going to provide more power than .040. You have that range because not every motor has the same deck height. So, when you buy a gasket, you try to get it within that margin. If cost is your major concern, then get the GM MLS. If your more worried about your motor being set-up to be efficent, then spend the extra $. Contact some of our sponsors. I found some willing to sell the Cometics for $52 a piece.
the same people who try to save a few bucks on gaskets are the same people who
![Huh](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/huh.gif)
#15
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (28)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 3,250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Beast96Z
Well, there is no need to ask the application when you are talking about a gasket that is .064" thick, or even .054". I'm not even talking about bore size, I'm talking about thicness and setting a quench height. In a traditional motor you want .035-.040 between the deck of your head and the top of the piston at TDC. In this case, a .064 or .054 gasket will not get you the quench area you want. The only place that makes the proper gasket is Cometic at .045" or .040" depending on your piston out of hole height.
Originally Posted by jrp
...people who try to save a few bucks on gaskets are the same people who
when they dont put down the same numbers...
![Huh](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/huh.gif)
[QUOTE=AFTICA]
GM .054 - .008 = .046
Cometic .045 - .008 = .037
QUOTE]
Specifically, what's happening in the additional 9 thousands of an inch that skews the HP & TQ numbers?
#16
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Quench accelerates turbulence and further concentrates the remaining mixture in the combustion chamber, while leaving a small margin for carbon build up. Basically you are trying to direct your burn pattern to the exaust valve and not setting a proper quench further reduces your chances of a complete burn. That's your diffrence between optimum and .009 out. The further out you are, the less optimium burn you have.
#18
11 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Based on my conversations with Brad at FFHP who recommends using the gaskets he ships with his heads (GM) .054, I was led to believe the difference (.009) meant nothing to HP and was getting too close for comfort. The only difference was the slight increase in compression...maybe 1 hp.
I will do whatever is best regardless of cost when I do my heads but after talking with Brad, I'm not sure what actually is best.
Again, what does the .009 buy you in hp?
I will do whatever is best regardless of cost when I do my heads but after talking with Brad, I'm not sure what actually is best.
Again, what does the .009 buy you in hp?
#19
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I can't give you an exact power figure, but why would people put a standardazation a quench area if it weren't meant to be met? There are 1 million and 1 things that could effect horsepower through given quenches. A car with a proper burn pattern will always run better than a car that isn't set-up correctlly. JRP used FFHP heads and you don't see him with the GM gaskets. The point is, is that if you take the time to set-up a combo correctlly, your car will run better. Even if your car dosen't make more power, which is doubtful, things like fuel mileage, timing, detonation, and the all around way your car runs can be effected by diffrent quenches. The point is, just do it right the first time. If your talking to Brad, maybe you could get him to come in here and post his theory as to why he thinks you should use the stock gasket as opposed to the one that is the right height.
#20
TT-TECH Veteran
iTrader: (29)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I agree with JRP's statement some what on all peoples numbers not being the same as the next guy, but a lot of that happens from the factory too. So I think some of it is the luck of the draw on the stock bottom end cars. They say you loose 1% of total hp for every point of compression lower. It is just a gestimation. 100hp you would loose 1hp etc...I know there are more things to play into this as tunning etc. If he was building a complete race car this might make a real difference, but I don't think that is the case so the differences will be never seen.LOL! Good discussion though.I liked everyones imput.