Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Big difference between TSP Torquer (233/233) and TSP 233/239?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-18-2005, 07:11 PM
  #41  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (7)
 
skimms98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: nottingham, MD
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Bill, love the wheels !! What do you plan on doing for tuning? Curious because both our cars are set up similar and A4...
Old 01-18-2005, 09:59 PM
  #42  
Staging Lane
 
shiznit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

After reading this thread I'm stuck between 231/237, 233/233, and now the 239/239.
Old 02-08-2005, 01:02 AM
  #43  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (7)
 
Zach@Texas-Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Lubbock
Posts: 1,106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have a yank pt3500 stall and it is fine for this cam and nitrous.....its just as streetable as both smaller cams i had before this one

from my understanding, the 233/239 has more aggressive lobes than the 231/237, less aggressive lobes than the torquer...I'll have to check back on that

I just purchased an LS6 manifold and I'm gonna find out what she puts down with that and a PP TB this week
Old 02-08-2005, 12:42 PM
  #44  
11 Second Club
 
Spellbound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Norcal
Posts: 639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Beast96Z
I wonder who said that? I was told the full specs the other day by a TSP employee and the lobes mimicked the XE-R. 233/239 @ .050" and 282/288 advertised. They did say it was ground by somone other than comp, which I assume is Lunati, but it was as aggressive as a XE-R. Sounds like somone from TSP needs to check in.....
My 233/239 came in a Precision Race Components tube. Cam card was just a piece of paper with 233/239 6xx/6xx 112+2 on it. No timing events.
Old 02-08-2005, 01:04 PM
  #45  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (59)
 
cyclerage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NJ
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Spellbound
My 233/239 came in a Precision Race Components tube. Cam card was just a piece of paper with 233/239 6xx/6xx 112+2 on it. No timing events.
Exactly!
Old 02-08-2005, 04:15 PM
  #46  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
luv2spd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Newton, KS
Posts: 1,152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

My torquer cam card was like that as well. Just duration, lift, and lsa.
Old 02-08-2005, 04:52 PM
  #47  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Bill Bowling's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Lawrenceville, GA
Posts: 2,596
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by skimms98
Bill, love the wheels !! What do you plan on doing for tuning? Curious because both our cars are set up similar and A4...
Thanks. I plan on doing my own tuning with help from this board.

Bill
Old 02-08-2005, 06:40 PM
  #48  
Cal
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Cal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Northern Utah
Posts: 4,692
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bull99ls1
UPDATE: I e-mailed Jason over @ TSP, asking which of the two would be a better choice in my situation and he recommend the 233/239 because it seems to put down more power that the Torquer and because it's easily streetable. So, I believe my decision is made there. Although I did find a KILLER deal on a GMPP ASA cam, but who knows. Thanks everyone. Any more input? Keep it coming.
Adam
I called Jason with the intent to buy a Torquer, and he talked me into a 235/240. He also wanted to sell me a Magic Stick. Both cams are traditional split. He said there is no advantage to using the Torquer.



Quick Reply: Big difference between TSP Torquer (233/233) and TSP 233/239?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:18 AM.