tea 1.5 Tr 224 dyno results
01-11-2005 | 02:09 AM
#21
Blowmasters. 
I actually have one, I bought the car that way. I have a cutout and never close it so i've not bothered with replacing the flowcrapper. Back in the bone stock days with the lowflowmaster only my best was 13.1@106 The flow must not be that bad 
I actually have one, I bought the car that way. I have a cutout and never close it so i've not bothered with replacing the flowcrapper. Back in the bone stock days with the lowflowmaster only my best was 13.1@106 The flow must not be that bad
01-11-2005 | 07:04 AM
#22
TECH Resident
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 848
Likes: 1
From: Working in the shop 24/7
01-12-2005 | 02:18 PM
#26
TECH Fanatic
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
Back in the bone stock days with the lowflowmaster only my best was 13.1@106 The flow must not be that bad
How lame is that?
Almost as lame as your post.
If you never close the cutout, why even HAVE a cutout?
It makes no sense. You could have used that $130 for something useful.
01-12-2005 | 03:58 PM
#27
Originally Posted by z98
I might have cost you a 1/10 or 1/2 a mph. But we are comparing it to a STOCK exhaust!
How lame is that?
Almost as lame as your post.
If you never close the cutout, why even HAVE a cutout?
It makes no sense. You could have used that $130 for something useful.
How lame is that?
Almost as lame as your post.
If you never close the cutout, why even HAVE a cutout?
It makes no sense. You could have used that $130 for something useful.
01-12-2005 | 05:43 PM
#28
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,028
Likes: 0
From: sojourning....looking for my city whose builder and maker is God.
Originally Posted by z98
If you never close the cutout, why even HAVE a cutout?
It makes no sense. You could have used that $130 for something useful.
It makes no sense. You could have used that $130 for something useful.
That's what I did before I changed my exhaust and added headers, I left it opened all the time. You do know that you can get a cutout for under $50.00 right?
