Opinions on Hot Cam...
Originally Posted by 92SilverSHO
hey SDPC sells the ASA kit for $1240, are the extra parts overkill??
Originally Posted by SouthFL.02.SS
All you need is the cam and springs. Retainers are optional. Pushrods should be swapped also. I don't know what $1240 buys ya, but whatever it is, you don't need to spend that much.
Originally Posted by dug
The whole idea behind the hot cam is great but is it necessary to be that consevative? The 918 springs have become pretty reliable and work great with the tr224 cam. The tr224 is better than the hotcam in everyway and can be had for $200 used. How often would 918 springs need to be changed with that cam? Ive gotten over 20k miles out of mine and my cam has more lift. Maybe 30k is possible with the tr224 cam.
I used think the hotcam was a good idea until I got a more aggressive cam. Now Im glad I didnt waste any time with the hotcam.
I used think the hotcam was a good idea until I got a more aggressive cam. Now Im glad I didnt waste any time with the hotcam.
385 rwhp and 379 rwtq through a 12 bolt with 4.10's with Hotcam and stock heads. Only tuning that I have is with a MAF translator and I did drill my tb. (HPP3 is only for gear ratio and stat) I have run a best of 12.08 @ 117.67 mph on a 1.75 60', can't get it any lower than that with the 26x10.5x16 ET streets. It pulls pretty good on the street and I am happy for now until I get the $ for a HC swap. Sounds bad *** as well!!!!
I say that if you can get it for cheap go for it but if not I'd get something else.
I say that if you can get it for cheap go for it but if not I'd get something else.
Originally Posted by ken02ws6
385 rwhp and 379 rwtq through a 12 bolt with 4.10's with Hotcam and stock heads. Only tuning that I have is with a MAF translator and I did drill my tb. (HPP3 is only for gear ratio and stat) I have run a best of 12.08 @ 117.67 mph on a 1.75 60', can't get it any lower than that with the 26x10.5x16 ET streets. It pulls pretty good on the street and I am happy for now until I get the $ for a HC swap. Sounds bad *** as well!!!!
I say that if you can get it for cheap go for it but if not I'd get something else.
I say that if you can get it for cheap go for it but if not I'd get something else.
LS6 or LS1 Hot cam?
I have the LS6 Gen3 Hot cam.
I'll be sellin it here soon for like 200 bucks when I buy a ligenfelter gt2-3 cam.
Originally Posted by D3IMOS
Which Hot cam do you have though?
LS6 or LS1 Hot cam?
I have the LS6 Gen3 Hot cam.
I'll be sellin it here soon for like 200 bucks when I buy a ligenfelter gt2-3 cam.
LS6 or LS1 Hot cam?
I have the LS6 Gen3 Hot cam.
I'll be sellin it here soon for like 200 bucks when I buy a ligenfelter gt2-3 cam.
Originally Posted by Another_User
The what? LS6 hot cam? Never heard of it...sounds like poopie to me.
Originally Posted by Another_User
I would like to see specs.
Originally Posted by D3IMOS
Well there is the Hot cam GM does for the LS1's and then there is the one they do for the LS6's. I've been told they are very similar but not the same.
While the debate goes on, the Hot Cam is a pretty good choice for a cam only motor. It has a nice ramp rate, so it's not that hard on the valve train. It has a KILLER idle! And it has a longer exh duration that complimetns the smaller vavles & lower exh flow rates. And you can see in my sig that 400rwhp is not out of line with one. True, I have 1.8 rocker arms, but 392 thru an A4 is not bad with stock heads.
That said, it does offer challenges to make it idle right, especially with an A4. But it CAN be done. And once I get my stall converter in, I should be knocking on the 11 sec range. Again, for up here in Seattle, that aint too shabby.
But you can put in a cam that will perform as well. The 224 is a nice streetable cam. Good power, and a fair idle. One thing I have heard about the Hot Cam is that it's lobes are tighter from front to back. Meaning that some cams will have more cernterline variations, while it is pretty dead-on.
The only good thing about the hotcam is the price. That's it. It has a LOT of total duration, and idles and drives much worse than larger cams. My roomate (Winman) had one and it drove much worse than my F11. He pulled it out and called Futral right away. The way i see it, if your car is going to lope real hard and surge, you might as well put a huge cam in it so you at least make more than 380rwhp. Call FMS, get a F11 or F13. They both drive like stock and make tons of power.
Originally Posted by LSUxBlake
The only good thing about the hotcam is the price. That's it. It has a LOT of total duration, and idles and drives much worse than larger cams. My roomate (Winman) had one and it drove much worse than my F11. He pulled it out and called Futral right away. The way i see it, if your car is going to lope real hard and surge, you might as well put a huge cam in it so you at least make more than 380rwhp. Call FMS, get a F11 or F13. They both drive like stock and make tons of power.
Originally Posted by Another_User
I completely disagree. The problem with the hotcam is that it requires tuning. You would never know my car has a hotcam from the idle. In fact, you really can't tell that it has a cam at all from the idle. The problem is, poopie tuners don't know how to tune for a hotcam. My idle is solid and smooth at stock timing at 900 rpm. The advantage to the hotcam is it's mid-range.
There is a reason why you don't see any of the popular cams with a 10 degree split pattern.
Last edited by LSUxBlake; Jan 22, 2005 at 09:51 PM.
Originally Posted by LSUxBlake
The only good thing about the hotcam is the price. That's it. It has a LOT of total duration, and idles and drives much worse than larger cams. My roomate (Winman) had one and it drove much worse than my F11. He pulled it out and called Futral right away. The way i see it, if your car is going to lope real hard and surge, you might as well put a huge cam in it so you at least make more than 380rwhp. Call FMS, get a F11 or F13. They both drive like stock and make tons of power.
Originally Posted by Another_User
I completely disagree. The problem with the hotcam is that it requires tuning. You would never know my car has a hotcam from the idle. In fact, you really can't tell that it has a cam at all from the idle. The problem is, poopie tuners don't know how to tune for a hotcam. My idle is solid and smooth at stock timing at 900 rpm. The advantage to the hotcam is it's mid-range.
Another User it doesn't idle like stock for me. But it does make good mid-range power. I think my idle is set to 800 though. It has a beautiful sound to it and the car pulls hard.
People talk a lot of trash on the hotcam. I think it's an awesome thing. I have full intentions on going to a Bigger cam when I switch to turbo but if you're researching and taking your time to really thouroughly learn cams or what ever. It's a great cam to switch to and not know anything about cams.
You can sleep soundly knowing it's going to make good power, drive well, and not give you any problems.
IMHO it's an I want to upgrade my cam but don't know what to do cam. Yet still know you're gonna get good benefits all around with no disadvantages.
I'm completely happy with the cam. Kinda worried about upgrading now cause I'm so happy with it I don't wanna mess up and choose the wrong cam.
Well i just finished my Hot Cam install yesterday and started it for the the first time haven't got a chance to drive it cause we have 2ft of snow i upgraded to the hot cam for idle it has sounds mean and theres enough spray to back it.So as of now i am happy car fired right just had to turn the key and it ran on its own didn't have to hold the rpm's up or anything like that and seems to idle right around 750rpms by it's self.Now i have a mean sounding idle and was a great learning expeirence installing it did comp 918's,LS6 oil pump,new timing chain set,hardend pushrods and the cam.
Thats my .02's and Blake rims look nice on your car seeing them makes me miss them
BTLFEDSS
Thats my .02's and Blake rims look nice on your car seeing them makes me miss them
BTLFEDSS
Originally Posted by Another_User
The problem with the hotcam is that it requires tuning.
Originally Posted by jrp
and thats the problem. the only thing the HC has for it is the cheap price but that goes out the window when you factor 250-500 for a tune. if your going to pay for a tune you might as well throw in a better cam or go with a cam that doesnt require tuning.
Originally Posted by D3IMOS
JRP. I know you're pretty well experienced and I respect your knowledge but I don't agree. I been running the cam almost 2 years. I think it's a great cam. I'm happy with it.


