Cylinder heads should be rated...
Thread Starter
7 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,758
Likes: 9
From: Port Tobacco, MD
Cylinder heads should be rated... I think that all cylinder heads should be rated by average flow from .100 to .600. Should this take out the question of who flows good on the top and who flows good on the low lifts. Don't the mustang magazines use average flow when they test?
Phil
Phil
i was going to bring this same thing up in the the ESP head thread. not to single them out but it's like "ok, another '300'cfm head"? no port volumes, no lift range, no valve sizing, no bore fixture diameter, ect.
hell, i think they should all flow through an intake as standard.
hell, i think they should all flow through an intake as standard.
Yeah, definitely through an intake as well. I don't pretend to understand flowbenches, but it would be really helpful if there was some kind of standardization involved. I guess you could still have shops faking numbers but independent tests could solve that issue.
Ben
Ben
Originally Posted by SAM98WS6
I would love it but you would call out alot of bs'ers...and alienate some sponsors..
This is a good idea, but until they are all tested on the same bench on the same day and under the same conditions, it is a worthless comparison if their own generated flow numbers are used.
I really really really think it'd be an AWESOME comparison, and even though its been brought up 100s of times and will most likely never happen, if all major cylinder head players (MTI, Patriot, Cartek, FFHP, WCCH, ET, TEA, TSP/Racetech, AFR, etc) sent a head to an independent tester to be flowed. All seemingly believe their product is best, and this would be an excellent selling point for the heads that did exceptionally well.
Until then head flow numbers need to be taken with a grain of salt unfortunately.
Oh well, we can dream can't we? 
Shawn
I really really really think it'd be an AWESOME comparison, and even though its been brought up 100s of times and will most likely never happen, if all major cylinder head players (MTI, Patriot, Cartek, FFHP, WCCH, ET, TEA, TSP/Racetech, AFR, etc) sent a head to an independent tester to be flowed. All seemingly believe their product is best, and this would be an excellent selling point for the heads that did exceptionally well.
Until then head flow numbers need to be taken with a grain of salt unfortunately.
Oh well, we can dream can't we? Shawn
Trending Topics
TECH Fanatic
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 0
From: harrisburg, pa
Originally Posted by jrp
i dont think it would alienate anybody. there is no one perfect set of heads, just like cams, some heads are better suited for one application over the other.
A big chart that people can understand would hurt some sponsors undoubtedly...and probably couldnt be done fairly. I like the idea...just wont ever happen. If you really understand the AFR tech posts..it shouldnt have been new news to you if you've talked to the head porters really know what they are doing...
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Topdon ONE vs. Artidiag 800 BT2: Which is the Diagnostic Tablet For You?
Pouria Savadkouei
Gas Monkey Built a 6-Wheel Ferrari Testarossa With a Corvette LT4 Engine
Verdad Gallardo
7 Most Reliable High-Performance Engines GM Has Ever Built
Verdad Gallardo
Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin
Verdad Gallardo
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Originally Posted by jrp
hell, i think they should all flow through an intake as standard.
but, in building a motor, putting the intake and headers to the head to see what the exact flow of the motor is can be useful in designing. i bet that if you flowed each cylinder with a header specific to the vehicle, each one would flow different due to the bends associated with each cylinder. in turn, you could port each cylinder to match the flow of all parts installed to get even flow out of all cylinders. now that would be a balanced motor.
On The Tree
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Way too many variables for these numbers to mean anything in the real world. Would have to run exhaust temp gases through under the running pressures as well for the exhaust side with the correct exhaust and collector. An engine is a system from air box to tail pipe, not a bunch of single pieces.
This will be a subject that'll probably be debated till the end of time.
We've seen power output swing wildly with identically flowing heads on identically prepared engines. Invariably when an engine is down on power the heads get the first blame. Most of the time those heads flow better than the stock parts, yet the heads are still cited as the problem. The LS1 cars have a number of other parts that effect the engine's tune including a computer controller.
Consistency in product has to be kept in mind. It's not enough to make a couple of nice flowing ports on an occasional basis. Day in day out, our goal is consistency from part to part.
Great topic,
Richard
We've seen power output swing wildly with identically flowing heads on identically prepared engines. Invariably when an engine is down on power the heads get the first blame. Most of the time those heads flow better than the stock parts, yet the heads are still cited as the problem. The LS1 cars have a number of other parts that effect the engine's tune including a computer controller.
Consistency in product has to be kept in mind. It's not enough to make a couple of nice flowing ports on an occasional basis. Day in day out, our goal is consistency from part to part.
Great topic,
Richard
TECH Resident
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 848
Likes: 1
From: Working in the shop 24/7
