Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Reason for Exhaust Bias of GM Cams?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-03-2005 | 07:37 PM
  #21  
Sport Side's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Unaffiliated Racing
compared to other heads the intake to exhaust ratio is very good...like I said it was mainly because of emissions.
Old 02-04-2005 | 10:35 AM
  #22  
AN1313's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Philadelphia, PA
Default

So if the ASA and GrandAm cam have been optimized by GM for max performance with headers, why do most aftermarket cams have designs with less exhaust bias? I'm sure GM did extensive testing.
Old 02-04-2005 | 10:51 AM
  #23  
Cal's Avatar
Cal
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,692
Likes: 3
From: Northern Utah
Default

I wouldn't say most aftermarket cam's have less exhaust duration. There are a lot of traditional splits, and are getting to be more all the time. Traditional splits are about all Comp Cam's sells. Most of the reverse splits are custom grinds. The intake is more sensitive to lift, while the exhaust likes duration.
Old 02-04-2005 | 11:47 AM
  #24  
AN1313's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Philadelphia, PA
Default

For example, here is Futral's cam specs from their website.

Why is the relationship between the intake and exhaust durations so different from the GM max performance designs?

FM-F2 224"/224" .588"/.588" 112 or 114
FM-F4 226"/226" .575"/.575" 112 or 114
FM-F5 224"/228" .588"/.576" 112 or 114
FM-F6 226"/230" .575"/.595" 112 or 114
FM-F7 224"/230" .588"/.595" 114 *
FM-F9 232"/236" .585"/.600" 114 *
FM1-F10 228"/228" .576"/.576" 112 or 114
FM1-F11 228"/230" .576"/.595" 112 or 114
FM1-F12 230"/230" .595"/.595" 112 or 114
FM1-F13 230"/232" .595"/.585" 112 or 114
FM1-F14 232"/234" .598"/.598" 112 or 114
FM1-RJ 236"/239" .600"/.611" 111

* recommended for blower/nitrous applications
Old 02-04-2005 | 11:56 AM
  #25  
Unaffliated Racing's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 873
Likes: 1
Default

No Cam company's keep many reverse splits on the shelf. Why? Because there are very few cyclinders heads in the world where the exhaust side out flows the intake side. Most reverse splits that cam companys have are some of the turbo grinds and that is because of how a turbo works. A reverse split really wouldn't do you any good on a typical head.
Old 02-04-2005 | 12:37 PM
  #26  
nuzee's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
From: Hawaii
Default

Check out what Ed "The Camfather" Iskederian has to say about longer exhaust duration:
http://www.iskycams.com/techtips.php#2003
Old 02-04-2005 | 03:21 PM
  #27  
66deuce's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 0
From: Goshen,In.
Default

Originally Posted by Unaffiliated Racing
No Cam company's keep many reverse splits on the shelf. Why? Because there are very few cyclinders heads in the world where the exhaust side out flows the intake side. Most reverse splits that cam companys have are some of the turbo grinds and that is because of how a turbo works. A reverse split really wouldn't do you any good on a typical head.
the FM 13 is standard split at .050 (230int. 232exh.) but at .200 lift it's a slight reverse split(151int. 150exh.) so is it a standard split cam or reverse split?remember that dur.at .050 lift is only one part of the cam spec,you have to take the dur. at the other lift points to get a true picture of a cam profile.if i were to guess,i would think that a lot of futrals cams follow this example.

Last edited by 66deuce; 02-04-2005 at 07:20 PM.
Old 02-04-2005 | 03:28 PM
  #28  
Cstraub's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,386
Likes: 38
From: Tri-Cities, TN
Default

Ed is Cool.. .tells it like it is.

Chris
Old 02-04-2005 | 03:43 PM
  #29  
Sport Side's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee, FL
Default

Originally Posted by nuzee
Check out what Ed "The Camfather" Iskederian has to say about longer exhaust duration:
http://www.iskycams.com/techtips.php#2003
Interesting theories & ideas.
Old 02-04-2005 | 03:55 PM
  #30  
66deuce's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 0
From: Goshen,In.
Default

i would also recommend the "Cam Disscussion" threads from awhile back.their long,but well worth the time for anyone that wants to learn about cams.

Last edited by 66deuce; 02-04-2005 at 04:00 PM.
Old 02-04-2005 | 04:20 PM
  #31  
MUSTANGEATER's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 1
From: Belleville, IL
Default

For an LS1 head a reverse split makes more sense too me, but then again specs @.050 mean very little to nothing.
Old 02-04-2005 | 04:39 PM
  #32  
Sport Side's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee, FL
Default

I find it funny...

Anti-reverse guys claim, they are only good for top end power. But yet, I've seen others claim they kink off power up top.

However, Ed Iskenderian writes:

At the drag strip it's a little different and I feel more honest. Here, racers have long enjoyed longer exhaust and longer durations across the board (If I may add specifically for the purpose of "killing" low-end torque) to keep the tires from too easily breaking lose. This has been successful and sometimes actually results in a slight increase in top end power - something you can actually use in drag racing since it is a full throttle endeavor through the lights. Keep in mind here though, it's quite possible that a longer duration cam overall would have done just as well or better. In other words if you needed that longer exhaust for top end, perhaps the intake could have benefited from such a lengthening as well.
Old 02-04-2005 | 04:40 PM
  #33  
MUSTANGEATER's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 1
From: Belleville, IL
Default

Can I be the guy who says its neither?
Old 02-04-2005 | 04:43 PM
  #34  
Sport Side's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee, FL
Talking

Originally Posted by MUSTANGEATER
Can I be the guy who says its neither?
Definetly. And to fill in your next words....match it to your setup, don't follow camps.

Close?
Old 02-04-2005 | 04:46 PM
  #35  
MUSTANGEATER's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 1
From: Belleville, IL
Default

Originally Posted by SportSide 5.3
Definetly. And to fill in your next words....match it to your setup, don't follow camps.

Close?
Are you working for Ms. Cleo now-a-days?
Old 02-04-2005 | 04:46 PM
  #36  
Sport Side's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee, FL
Default

****, i took her job...kicked her on the street.

Old 02-04-2005 | 05:26 PM
  #37  
Unaffliated Racing's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 873
Likes: 1
Default

Well I've probably spec'd out more LS-1 cams than most people around....99% of the time I will use a traditional split unless it's a turbo grind. Yes, granted the LS-1 head has a very good intake to exhaust flow ratio..it still lacks a little on the exhaust side.
Old 02-04-2005 | 06:24 PM
  #38  
Cal's Avatar
Cal
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,692
Likes: 3
From: Northern Utah
Default

I think there is no question that a traditional split is better for a normally aspirated LS1, but the best split ratio may not be as big as those GM off-road cams have.
Old 02-04-2005 | 06:45 PM
  #39  
Sport Side's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Cal
I think there is no question that a traditional split is better for a normally aspirated LS1, but the best split ratio may not be as big as those GM off-road cams have.
Probably the most impressive, forum favorite ots grind. The F13, is a 230* 232* .595 .585 @ 112

An intake crutch is in place once the intake valve is cracked open enough to where the head flows decent.

Any way it's put, it comes down to the setup and type of usage. There are to many varieties of normally aspirated setups to say, all will make more power with more exhaust lobe.
Old 02-04-2005 | 07:18 PM
  #40  
66deuce's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 0
From: Goshen,In.
Default

Originally Posted by SportSide 5.3
Probably the most impressive, forum favorite ots grind. The F13, is a 230* 232* .595 .585 @ 112

An intake crutch is in place once the intake valve is cracked open enough to where the head flows decent.

Any way it's put, it comes down to the setup and type of usage. There are to many varieties of normally aspirated setups to say, all will make more power with more exhaust lobe.
i agree.it all depends on your combination.and i would be willing to bet that a good number of "standard split" ots cams are in fact reverse split or at least single pattern once you get above .050 lift.


Quick Reply: Reason for Exhaust Bias of GM Cams?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:32 PM.