Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

big cam statement

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-30-2005, 07:50 PM
  #121  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Brandon Boomhauer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Gainesville, Denton TX
Posts: 8,766
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

HAHA, thanks jrp? what for? He hasn't posted anything noticablly nice towards you.

I would give you credit for #s, IF you showed a damn graph. I do believe that cam is capable of 400rwhp, but not the tq. You still haven't said a damn thing about your drivetrain either. Post that **** up too.

You think I'm not satisfied with my power? I love it, do some searching in FMS based threads, great customer service, and a great product.

You must be a true idiot to believe that horsepower is all that makes times... Its the entire setup of the car, from suspension to weight to drivetrain etc. Just because you have a 700rwhp car doesnt mean it will go 9s, nore 10s for that matter.
Smokin01TA has an amazing setup, he is on the stock longblock, damn man. CAM ONLY M6. Yeah Alan futral has run 9s in a stock ci m6, but thats a H/C motor. Smokin is the FASTEST M6 Cam only car. Period.

What happened to the 455 Strocker? I was waiting on that man.... Now you are going with a 427 and a procharger...

You want people to quit talking **** and so on, but you still haven't posted a graph.
How hard is it man? Do we need to take up a paypal collection? Hell post or PM me the shop that did the dyno for you, I'm sure they can email anyone of us an image...
Its not that damn hard.

Go crawl back in your hole, or back over to hondasrule or where ever the hell you came from.
Old 03-30-2005, 07:54 PM
  #122  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
99whitews6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 907
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

So bobby, i'm still trying to figure out what setup you are upgrading to. Maybe you should start by backing up your current numbers with a dyno or timeslip. The way you talk im guessing you wont be getting your 454...i mean 427.... i mean.......... for a very long time anyways.

Please do everyone a favor and leave this forum............"i mean 427 with 700 hp"
Old 03-30-2005, 09:13 PM
  #123  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (10)
 
GrannySShifting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Glen Burnie, Md
Posts: 3,944
Received 20 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

The best part of this azz clown ran down some girls leg probably 17 years ago
Old 03-30-2005, 09:20 PM
  #124  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
66deuce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Goshen,In.
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i don't think he even has a car.he's just making all this stuff up.reads a few pages in Hot Rod,then goes and posts on ls1 tech.what a mental midget.
Old 03-30-2005, 11:24 PM
  #125  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (10)
 
SMOKIN01TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: McComb, MS
Posts: 4,112
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by bobby1
allan futral runns 9's texas speed and performance has a car running 10's and goto mti or thunder racing and look at the customer cars section now I'm not saying that there runs are official but they are their. Now once again you have a great set on your car but I will have a 427 with a procharger and if I can't do better than 10's at 130 I will need to take some driving lessons, keep in mind my car will be 600-750 to the wheels and your car makes 453!
uh ok, first of all the tsp car is a tad slower so that was a pretty lame argument and alan is not a stock motor h/c setup, his is a fully built h/c solid roller motor so thats a different category than we are talking about here, thats not exactly a h/c package. im very aware of thunders customer cars section since im in it. and as far as stock shortblocks are concerned fastest h/c car is a 10.37 @129 fastest cam car weather it be auto or m6 is a 10.43 @130 being myself with the way the car was setup. now if you wanna go getting all technical gimme some afr 225's and ill be right there with allans car with a stock short block. im just awaiting the release of these new heads. i built my car around my setup to work perfectly together and the car should be capable of 10.20's in similar conditions to the .43 run still cam only, so if your cam is just so great lets see if it can et .
i can believe the hp#'s you claim but unless you reading the torque spike frome a big converter flash on a dyno i call bs on the tq #'s
Old 03-31-2005, 10:57 AM
  #126  
Banned
iTrader: (115)
 
99blancoSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: ST Helens, OR
Posts: 9,892
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

bobby1 are you really going to argue this further?
SMOKIN01TA is the real deal. He knows what he's talking about here. I'd kill for his car
Old 04-01-2005, 03:49 AM
  #127  
Staging Lane
 
denton needham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by denton needham
Well I geuss the venting is over. I think there is a lot of people that hit the hp wall on the LS1, hence the lying, My friend puts out 750 hp with a sbc 434. won a national title in a chevy luv truck. out fitted with a powerglide. HIS cam is a small base 785 lift 278 duration @.50 on a 101.5 lsa. Now THAT is a BIG CAM STATEMENT.
Oh yeah, His parts cost him $7,000 and he did his own machine work. You can buy one for $10,000. WHEN is the LS1 gonna get cheaper to build and WHEN is it gonna have 750 hp na? I am waiting.... with $$$
Old 04-01-2005, 06:53 AM
  #128  
6600 rpm clutch dump of death Administrator
 
J-Rod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,983
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

I think this is appropriate for this thread...



Is there a point to this thread?
Old 04-01-2005, 09:43 AM
  #129  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (10)
 
GrannySShifting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Glen Burnie, Md
Posts: 3,944
Received 20 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Werd bitches!
Old 04-01-2005, 10:08 AM
  #130  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
PewterZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: St.Louis, MO
Posts: 1,088
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by J-Rod
I think this is appropriate for this thread...



Is there a point to this thread?
LMFAO!

This thread should be locked with that being the last post. I think I am now stupider for having read this entire thread.
Old 04-02-2005, 11:14 AM
  #131  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
bobby1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Dyno Graph

Graph attached. Additional comments not necessary.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf
DynoNumbers.pdf (39.0 KB, 197 views)
Old 04-02-2005, 11:20 AM
  #132  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
2c5s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Murrieta Ca.
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I'm not opening anything this idiot posts.
Old 04-02-2005, 11:37 AM
  #133  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Brandon Boomhauer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Gainesville, Denton TX
Posts: 8,766
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Open it. Its fine.

Im suprised to see you actually posted something. While the curve looks nice, that isnt 440rwtq. Those are spikes... Looks close to 360ish rwtq.
Old 04-02-2005, 11:51 AM
  #134  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
cyphur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: North Texas
Posts: 8,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bobby1
Graph attached. Additional comments not necessary.
Hmm....true. You've already proved that you can't read a ****** graph. Thanks for wasting our time with a torque spike. Feel free to not play again.
Old 04-02-2005, 11:55 AM
  #135  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Brandon Boomhauer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Gainesville, Denton TX
Posts: 8,766
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cyphur_traq
Hmm....true. You've already proved that you can't read a ****** graph. Thanks for wasting our time with a torque spike. Feel free to not play again.
LMFAO!!!
haah
Old 04-02-2005, 02:34 PM
  #136  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (10)
 
SMOKIN01TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: McComb, MS
Posts: 4,112
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

hahahhahaa, i knew this was bs. the car puts down 390rwhp without the spike and 360rwtq. so yes, once you get heads ill still accept your challenge. not to mention your freakin running almost a 14.1 a/f ratio. nice and lean, when it get summer can anyone say kaboom
Old 04-02-2005, 02:48 PM
  #137  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Brandon Boomhauer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Gainesville, Denton TX
Posts: 8,766
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SMOKIN01TA
hahahhahaa, i knew this was bs. the car puts down 390rwhp without the spike and 360rwtq. so yes, once you get heads ill still accept your challenge. not to mention your freakin running almost a 14.1 a/f ratio. nice and lean, when it get summer can anyone say kaboom
Hahahaha, I didn't even notice the A/F as i was laughin at the 440rwtq.

I bet that sumbitch is detonating like holy hell...
Old 04-02-2005, 04:30 PM
  #138  
Teching In
 
2002SS#7867's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SMOKIN01TA
hahahhahaa, i knew this was bs. the car puts down 390rwhp without the spike and 360rwtq.
And, did you notice it is standard-corrected (STD), and not SAE? My dyno data showed about 10 fewer HP & TQ when using SAE, which is the true standard. (And, we don't know the RPM!)
Old 04-02-2005, 06:33 PM
  #139  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (10)
 
SMOKIN01TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: McComb, MS
Posts: 4,112
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by 2002SS#7867
And, did you notice it is standard-corrected (STD), and not SAE? My dyno data showed about 10 fewer HP & TQ when using SAE, which is the true standard. (And, we don't know the RPM!)
haha, sure enough, yea, mine was like way more than 10hp un sae corrected too.
Old 04-02-2005, 08:38 PM
  #140  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
crainholio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,977
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Another smack talker bites the big one...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:21 AM.