Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

big cam statement

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 30, 2005 | 07:50 PM
  #121  
Brandon Boomhauer's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,766
Likes: 0
From: Gainesville, Denton TX
Default

HAHA, thanks jrp? what for? He hasn't posted anything noticablly nice towards you.

I would give you credit for #s, IF you showed a damn graph. I do believe that cam is capable of 400rwhp, but not the tq. You still haven't said a damn thing about your drivetrain either. Post that **** up too.

You think I'm not satisfied with my power? I love it, do some searching in FMS based threads, great customer service, and a great product.

You must be a true idiot to believe that horsepower is all that makes times... Its the entire setup of the car, from suspension to weight to drivetrain etc. Just because you have a 700rwhp car doesnt mean it will go 9s, nore 10s for that matter.
Smokin01TA has an amazing setup, he is on the stock longblock, damn man. CAM ONLY M6. Yeah Alan futral has run 9s in a stock ci m6, but thats a H/C motor. Smokin is the FASTEST M6 Cam only car. Period.

What happened to the 455 Strocker? I was waiting on that man.... Now you are going with a 427 and a procharger...

You want people to quit talking **** and so on, but you still haven't posted a graph.
How hard is it man? Do we need to take up a paypal collection? Hell post or PM me the shop that did the dyno for you, I'm sure they can email anyone of us an image...
Its not that damn hard.

Go crawl back in your hole, or back over to hondasrule or where ever the hell you came from.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2005 | 07:54 PM
  #122  
99whitews6's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 907
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
Default

So bobby, i'm still trying to figure out what setup you are upgrading to. Maybe you should start by backing up your current numbers with a dyno or timeslip. The way you talk im guessing you wont be getting your 454...i mean 427.... i mean.......... for a very long time anyways.

Please do everyone a favor and leave this forum............"i mean 427 with 700 hp"
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2005 | 09:13 PM
  #123  
GrannySShifting's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,944
Likes: 21
From: Glen Burnie, Md
Default

The best part of this azz clown ran down some girls leg probably 17 years ago
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2005 | 09:20 PM
  #124  
66deuce's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 0
From: Goshen,In.
Default

i don't think he even has a car.he's just making all this stuff up.reads a few pages in Hot Rod,then goes and posts on ls1 tech.what a mental midget.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2005 | 11:24 PM
  #125  
SMOKIN01TA's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,112
Likes: 1
From: McComb, MS
Default

Originally Posted by bobby1
allan futral runns 9's texas speed and performance has a car running 10's and goto mti or thunder racing and look at the customer cars section now I'm not saying that there runs are official but they are their. Now once again you have a great set on your car but I will have a 427 with a procharger and if I can't do better than 10's at 130 I will need to take some driving lessons, keep in mind my car will be 600-750 to the wheels and your car makes 453!
uh ok, first of all the tsp car is a tad slower so that was a pretty lame argument and alan is not a stock motor h/c setup, his is a fully built h/c solid roller motor so thats a different category than we are talking about here, thats not exactly a h/c package. im very aware of thunders customer cars section since im in it. and as far as stock shortblocks are concerned fastest h/c car is a 10.37 @129 fastest cam car weather it be auto or m6 is a 10.43 @130 being myself with the way the car was setup. now if you wanna go getting all technical gimme some afr 225's and ill be right there with allans car with a stock short block. im just awaiting the release of these new heads. i built my car around my setup to work perfectly together and the car should be capable of 10.20's in similar conditions to the .43 run still cam only, so if your cam is just so great lets see if it can et .
i can believe the hp#'s you claim but unless you reading the torque spike frome a big converter flash on a dyno i call bs on the tq #'s
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2005 | 10:57 AM
  #126  
99blancoSS's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (115)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 9,892
Likes: 3
From: ST Helens, OR
Default

bobby1 are you really going to argue this further?
SMOKIN01TA is the real deal. He knows what he's talking about here. I'd kill for his car
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2005 | 03:49 AM
  #127  
denton needham's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by denton needham
Well I geuss the venting is over. I think there is a lot of people that hit the hp wall on the LS1, hence the lying, My friend puts out 750 hp with a sbc 434. won a national title in a chevy luv truck. out fitted with a powerglide. HIS cam is a small base 785 lift 278 duration @.50 on a 101.5 lsa. Now THAT is a BIG CAM STATEMENT.
Oh yeah, His parts cost him $7,000 and he did his own machine work. You can buy one for $10,000. WHEN is the LS1 gonna get cheaper to build and WHEN is it gonna have 750 hp na? I am waiting.... with $$$
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2005 | 06:53 AM
  #128  
J-Rod's Avatar
6600 rpm clutch dump of death Administrator
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,983
Likes: 13
From: Texas
Default

I think this is appropriate for this thread...



Is there a point to this thread?
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2005 | 09:43 AM
  #129  
GrannySShifting's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,944
Likes: 21
From: Glen Burnie, Md
Default

Werd bitches!
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2005 | 10:08 AM
  #130  
PewterZ28's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,088
Likes: 0
From: St.Louis, MO
Default

Originally Posted by J-Rod
I think this is appropriate for this thread...



Is there a point to this thread?
LMFAO!

This thread should be locked with that being the last post. I think I am now stupider for having read this entire thread.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2005 | 11:14 AM
  #131  
bobby1's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Default Dyno Graph

Graph attached. Additional comments not necessary.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf
DynoNumbers.pdf (39.0 KB, 223 views)
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2005 | 11:20 AM
  #132  
2c5s's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 0
From: Murrieta Ca.
Default

I'm not opening anything this idiot posts.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2005 | 11:37 AM
  #133  
Brandon Boomhauer's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,766
Likes: 0
From: Gainesville, Denton TX
Default

Open it. Its fine.

Im suprised to see you actually posted something. While the curve looks nice, that isnt 440rwtq. Those are spikes... Looks close to 360ish rwtq.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2005 | 11:51 AM
  #134  
cyphur's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,009
Likes: 0
From: North Texas
Default

Originally Posted by bobby1
Graph attached. Additional comments not necessary.
Hmm....true. You've already proved that you can't read a ****** graph. Thanks for wasting our time with a torque spike. Feel free to not play again.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2005 | 11:55 AM
  #135  
Brandon Boomhauer's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,766
Likes: 0
From: Gainesville, Denton TX
Default

Originally Posted by cyphur_traq
Hmm....true. You've already proved that you can't read a ****** graph. Thanks for wasting our time with a torque spike. Feel free to not play again.
LMFAO!!!
haah
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2005 | 02:34 PM
  #136  
SMOKIN01TA's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,112
Likes: 1
From: McComb, MS
Default

hahahhahaa, i knew this was bs. the car puts down 390rwhp without the spike and 360rwtq. so yes, once you get heads ill still accept your challenge. not to mention your freakin running almost a 14.1 a/f ratio. nice and lean, when it get summer can anyone say kaboom
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2005 | 02:48 PM
  #137  
Brandon Boomhauer's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,766
Likes: 0
From: Gainesville, Denton TX
Default

Originally Posted by SMOKIN01TA
hahahhahaa, i knew this was bs. the car puts down 390rwhp without the spike and 360rwtq. so yes, once you get heads ill still accept your challenge. not to mention your freakin running almost a 14.1 a/f ratio. nice and lean, when it get summer can anyone say kaboom
Hahahaha, I didn't even notice the A/F as i was laughin at the 440rwtq.

I bet that sumbitch is detonating like holy hell...
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2005 | 04:30 PM
  #138  
2002SS#7867's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, OH
Default

Originally Posted by SMOKIN01TA
hahahhahaa, i knew this was bs. the car puts down 390rwhp without the spike and 360rwtq.
And, did you notice it is standard-corrected (STD), and not SAE? My dyno data showed about 10 fewer HP & TQ when using SAE, which is the true standard. (And, we don't know the RPM!)
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2005 | 06:33 PM
  #139  
SMOKIN01TA's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,112
Likes: 1
From: McComb, MS
Default

Originally Posted by 2002SS#7867
And, did you notice it is standard-corrected (STD), and not SAE? My dyno data showed about 10 fewer HP & TQ when using SAE, which is the true standard. (And, we don't know the RPM!)
haha, sure enough, yea, mine was like way more than 10hp un sae corrected too.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2005 | 08:38 PM
  #140  
crainholio's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,977
Likes: 3
Default

Another smack talker bites the big one...
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:28 PM.