big cam statement
Originally Posted by cyphur_traq
the Saint Bobby of Assinine cam!
At least now we know what to call a comp 232/240. Right up there with the rest of the other named cams... magic stick, T-Rex, Torquer, etc.
Originally Posted by bobby1
It seems everybody on this forum missed the point of my original statement was to let everybody know that there are other cams out there, that are just as good maybe evenbetter than the t rex or magic stick or fm11-14!
Originally Posted by SMOKIN01TA
No we understand what you point is, you just failed to prove it bigtime. and yea, there is a cam or 2 probably close to as good at them but sorry to say yours isnt no where near that. i pulled over 420 with a stock intake on a stock tune to the tires, and that was sae corrected, not std. so even with heads and a lsx and a tune you will still be close to 100rwhp off the rest those cams.
Originally Posted by SOUNDENGINEER
there are guys on here wit the t-rex.... no ported heads...no LSX....
putting down 400+ to the ground.....
putting down 400+ to the ground.....
http://www.thunderracing.com/custome...n=view&ccid=36
Last edited by soundengineer; Apr 3, 2005 at 11:53 PM.
i should have bobby1 to spec out a cam for my motor, the one in there doesnt get the job done. just check the #'s in my sig to see.
Last edited by antz01ta; Apr 4, 2005 at 08:20 AM.
Originally Posted by Tranzor_Z28
Ok guys... start lining up for the Saint Bobby cam. It's a Comp 232/240, lubed with holy motor oil and blessed by John Force himself. 
Staging Lane
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
I have a Saint cam too! I keep it by my bed to send a-holes to meet their saints! Best damn thing in the world for self protection is a cam with big lobes. How much longer is this going to go on? Oh you mean I am supposed to put it in an engine?
so what do i win, i called it on page 2 or 3 , the torque spike that is.
too bad we dont have a thread archieve, this one definately would qualifiy for admitance (sp).
bobby - i suggest you abandon this screen name and start fresh, nothing you say hence forth will ever be taken seriously.
, the torque spike that is. too bad we dont have a thread archieve, this one definately would qualifiy for admitance (sp).
bobby - i suggest you abandon this screen name and start fresh, nothing you say hence forth will ever be taken seriously.
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,766
Likes: 0
From: Gainesville, Denton TX
Originally Posted by jrp
so what do i win, i called it on page 2 or 3 , the torque spike that is.
too bad we dont have a thread archieve, this one definately would qualifiy for admitance (sp).
bobby - i suggest you abandon this screen name and start fresh, nothing you say hence forth will ever be taken seriously.
, the torque spike that is. too bad we dont have a thread archieve, this one definately would qualifiy for admitance (sp).
bobby - i suggest you abandon this screen name and start fresh, nothing you say hence forth will ever be taken seriously.
Originally Posted by Brandon
I was starting to wonder if you had given up all hope for this thread or just waiting on the graph...
Originally Posted by jrp
bobby - i suggest you abandon this screen name and start fresh, nothing you say hence forth will ever be taken seriously.
On The Tree
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, Ca. /Waco, Tx.
Dude, there is no way you are making 440rwtq...sorry, hate to say it...but you are FULL O' ****!!!
There is no way you are even making that number in rwhp...your mods don't add up, and a non-stroked, stock cubed motor with a cam and bolt-ons is NOT going to make 50 more rwtq than rwhp.
There is no way you are even making that number in rwhp...your mods don't add up, and a non-stroked, stock cubed motor with a cam and bolt-ons is NOT going to make 50 more rwtq than rwhp.
Originally Posted by Slow98TA
Dude, there is no way you are making 440rwtq...sorry, hate to say it...but you are FULL O' ****!!!
There is no way you are even making that number in rwhp...your mods don't add up, and a non-stroked, stock cubed motor with a cam and bolt-ons is NOT going to make 50 more rwtq than rwhp.
There is no way you are even making that number in rwhp...your mods don't add up, and a non-stroked, stock cubed motor with a cam and bolt-ons is NOT going to make 50 more rwtq than rwhp.
I hoped and prayed for something to make this thread worth the 25 minutes I took reading it.
Why must newbies post confrontational statements and why do veterans post retorts? Just let it die.
Why must newbies post confrontational statements and why do veterans post retorts? Just let it die.
Originally Posted by jrp
man, this thread just gets better and better 
440rwtq. :BS:. unless it was an unlocked a4 with a tq spike.
10 to 1 bet that the guy read the tq spike and thinks he's actually putting that much tq down
440rwtq. :BS:. unless it was an unlocked a4 with a tq spike.10 to 1 bet that the guy read the tq spike and thinks he's actually putting that much tq down
hit that one on the head there...on page 3... LOL
JRP Bobby1....
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,766
Likes: 0
From: Gainesville, Denton TX
Originally Posted by chief455
I hoped and prayed for something to make this thread worth the 25 minutes I took reading it.
Why must newbies post confrontational statements and why do veterans post retorts? Just let it die.
Why must newbies post confrontational statements and why do veterans post retorts? Just let it die.
Retardo first on page one. 
