Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

MS3: 343 rwhp, 12.2@111. What's going on?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-12-2005, 09:38 AM
  #21  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
foff667's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Clermont, FL
Posts: 7,986
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by blkZ28spt
And here you're running 11.6's with the LS6 intake and AFR 205's. Maybe the MS3 really doesn't like the 3500/3.23 combo that much?
i would think your cam would peak later then what your dyno states...i wouldve thought closer to 6500 *shrug* but no large cams like small tight converters or street gearing...4000/3.73 combo+ is a must to really take advantage.
Old 04-12-2005, 09:44 AM
  #22  
TECH Enthusiast
 
00Z28 Camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palm Harbor,Tampa
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by cyphur_traq
shouldn't be THAT weak bro, there's definitely something up with this.

Yeah I agree , and whats with that dyno x-marks the spot
Old 04-12-2005, 09:56 AM
  #23  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
blkZ28spt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The South
Posts: 5,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by 99whitews6
I have the identical set-up and I will be dynoing mine as soon as I get PE tuned. I hope I am right around 380-400 at the rear wheels.
Same setup plus LS6 intake. I'll be interested to see yours as well.
Old 04-12-2005, 10:00 AM
  #24  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
Taphee6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Cary Il
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default ms3

What lifters are you running. Did you set preload correctly. Also, I to have a 98 and KR is a pain in the butt.
Old 04-12-2005, 11:05 AM
  #25  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Jason 98 TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Texas!
Posts: 4,229
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Definately sounds like there is a problem somewhere. We typically see a 60rwhp gain from the MS3 camshaft. We recently went over 420rwhp cam only with a 90mm setup & a ms3! Did you autotap it any while tuning on it?

Jason
Texas Speed
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Old 04-12-2005, 11:26 AM
  #26  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
blkZ28spt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The South
Posts: 5,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Jason 98 TA
Definately sounds like there is a problem somewhere. We typically see a 60rwhp gain from the MS3 camshaft. We recently went over 420rwhp cam only with a 90mm setup & a ms3! Did you autotap it any while tuning on it?

Jason
Texas Speed
I have no idea. It was tuned at Speed inc though. Apparently I'll have to find a way to get a log of some runs. I don't have autotap or anything like that, but hopefully somebody around here does.....
Old 04-12-2005, 12:49 PM
  #27  
Moderator
iTrader: (9)
 
LIL SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: San Jose area
Posts: 2,966
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I still strongly think you should

A) Lock the converter
B) Put an LS6 intake on it
C) Find out why it is falling on it's face at 6k rpm..

I bet you do those things and you will see the numbers your looking for..
Old 04-12-2005, 01:07 PM
  #28  
TECH Veteran
 
Tranzor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kent WA
Posts: 4,954
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The LS1 intake has a lot to do with lowering your numbers... MS3 is the kind of cam that likes to live well into the 6k rpm range, and your LS1 intake just plain won't support that kind of rpm. So the cam falls on its face because of the bottleneck... I bet if you switched to an LS6 (or an LSX for that matter) intake you'd see a significant jump. Maybe as much as 20-25 rwhp with a new tune to account for the intake... add a pulley, might pick up 5 rwhp more on the dyno.

If that turns out to be the case, 375 rwhp or so unlocked would not be a bad number at all...
Old 04-12-2005, 01:59 PM
  #29  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
blkZ28spt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The South
Posts: 5,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Tranzor_Z28
The LS1 intake has a lot to do with lowering your numbers... MS3 is the kind of cam that likes to live well into the 6k rpm range, and your LS1 intake just plain won't support that kind of rpm. So the cam falls on its face because of the bottleneck... I bet if you switched to an LS6 (or an LSX for that matter) intake you'd see a significant jump. Maybe as much as 20-25 rwhp with a new tune to account for the intake... add a pulley, might pick up 5 rwhp more on the dyno.

If that turns out to be the case, 375 rwhp or so unlocked would not be a bad number at all...
That is exactly what I have been hoping. I dont know how long it'll be before I can afford the intake/pulley though. If I did manage to find 22 rwhp from intake/retune and 5-10rwhp from the pulley that would be 370-375 rwhp on a stock headed 98 through unlocked 3500 stall converter, and would likely run mid-high 11's with minor suspension work.

I probably won't be putting any more money into it until at least June-July though. Have a few weeks of school left that I am trying not to fail, and if they get enough people signed up I have a maymester course that's four days a week from May 16-June 10 I think it is, so I wouldn't really be able to work and make any more money until mid June.

Then again almost everyone who sees it says that something is wrong as is.
Old 04-12-2005, 02:03 PM
  #30  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (4)
 
1999T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Fuquay Varina , NC
Posts: 300
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by blkZ28spt
That is exactly what I have been hoping. I dont know how long it'll be before I can afford the intake/pulley though. If I did manage to find 22 rwhp from intake/retune and 5-10rwhp from the pulley that would be 370-375 rwhp on a stock headed 98 through unlocked 3500 stall converter, and would likely run mid-high 11's with minor suspension work.

Then again almost everyone who sees it says that something is wrong as is.

Dont feel too bad man . My numbers were 347rwhp/362tq with the mods in my sig . And that is with a rebuilt engine . I do have the stock catback mated to Macs and an ORY . LS1 intake here too . We both gotta fix that , plus I gotta get a catback .
Old 04-12-2005, 02:12 PM
  #31  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Ragtop 99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 9,491
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

A gain of 4.5 mph isn't bad.

The weak top end is definitely a problem for a cam of that size. If it is not choked by the intake, I'd look next at the valve springs.
Old 04-12-2005, 02:35 PM
  #32  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
blkZ28spt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The South
Posts: 5,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Ragtop 99
A gain of 4.5 mph isn't bad.

The weak top end is definitely a problem for a cam of that size. If it is not choked by the intake, I'd look next at the valve springs.
That is one of the first things that comes to mind when the power drops off oddly at higher RPM, but we are talking barely over 6k rpm with PRC duals and Ti retainers. Of all the possibilities I really don't think the springs are the problem, though I obviously don't know and anything is possible.
Old 04-12-2005, 08:29 PM
  #33  
Launching!
 
yungn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have this setup with a yankPT4000,stock 3.23's,stock ls1 intake,no pulley, no TB, and dynoed 380/394, I am hoping after intake ,TB and pulley it will be 400, they told me before i went to TSP to get my car dynoed it would dyno anywhere from 350-380 without the rest of those bolt-ons and that big of a stall. Your car seems to be running about the right times, those are crazy dyno numbers. I watched a automatic MSV3 car with heads/and full bolt ons only put down 387 if that makes you feel better. I went 7.7X's and stalled the yank up at 2400, Im honestly not sure what it needs to be stalled at because i have never driven a verter car and that was my first time. What were the track conditions like if you dont mind me asking?

Last edited by yungn; 04-13-2005 at 12:20 AM.
Old 04-12-2005, 08:45 PM
  #34  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
blkZ28spt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The South
Posts: 5,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

The track conditions, based on consensus opinion among those in my club/group that went, were poor. Too much VHT apparently, among other things. I myself couldn't really tell you anything beyond that I couldn't get it to dead hook once. Came really close though, and I don't think there is a whole lot left in it as it sits.

I'm not horribly dissapointed with the times even though I was hoping to push 11's. I know it's workable to 12.1's for sure as it sits, and hopefully ~11.8 with nothing but intake and pulley. Then a torque arm, maybe LCA's, drop some more weight, 3.73's and I'd hope to be 11.5-6 cam only on a '98 with a moderate stall speed. I'd be more than happy with that.
Old 04-12-2005, 09:07 PM
  #35  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
 
SSPEEDY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Hey man, I'm kind of in a similar situation but haven't run my car since I dynoed low (compared to before).

Take a few minutes and read this https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...17#post2011417
Old 04-12-2005, 10:01 PM
  #36  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Drew778's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 866
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blkZ28spt
And here you're running 11.6's with the LS6 intake and AFR 205's. Maybe the MS3 really doesn't like the 3500/3.23 combo that much?

Yes, LS-6 intake and AFR 205's, I think 3:73's and a 4400 stall would help a lot
Old 04-13-2005, 05:02 AM
  #37  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
99whitews6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 907
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by blkZ28spt
Same setup plus LS6 intake. I'll be interested to see yours as well.
Guess I wont be able to dyno mine for a while as I ordered my LC-1 wideband a couple of days ago and they just called me back to confirm that it will be 2-3 weeks before i get it!
Old 04-13-2005, 06:39 AM
  #38  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
gollum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

This is very simple people. It looks to me like a "classic case" of being over cammed for his set up.
Old 04-13-2005, 07:09 AM
  #39  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
v8maro's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Commerce, MI
Posts: 1,563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I agree with gomer, looks like knock. What springs do you have again? Make sure none of them are broken.
Old 04-13-2005, 11:17 AM
  #40  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (4)
 
1999T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Fuquay Varina , NC
Posts: 300
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by gollum
This is very simple people. It looks to me like a "classic case" of being over cammed for his set up.

That means Im overcammed too , with what I got . Thats a good thing though , it just means I got more mods to do to get the power out . I can live with that .


Quick Reply: MS3: 343 rwhp, 12.2@111. What's going on?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:59 AM.