Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

only 351.5 rwhp & 323.3 rwtq on 224/224 patriot ls6 head combo...why so low?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-03-2005, 03:09 PM
  #41  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
AsianIce25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BBQLS1
The misfiring changes everything. Let us know what you find out.
it only seems to be misfiring at idle though. how do i fix it?
Old 05-03-2005, 03:49 PM
  #42  
TECH Enthusiast
 
BrentB@TEA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chattanooga
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

almost all aftermarket cams will misfire at idle.
Old 05-03-2005, 04:24 PM
  #43  
TECH Junkie
 
verbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: At the office
Posts: 3,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BrentB@TEA
almost all aftermarket cams will misfire at idle.
mine too.

Those numbers seem very low. I don't think a dynojet is your solution. I'm assuming you are running LS6 "style" heads, not true LS6 heads correct? If they're real LS6 heads then I'd panic
Old 05-03-2005, 05:03 PM
  #44  
On The Tree
iTrader: (6)
 
jurisz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: McAllen, TX
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by verbs
mine too.

Those numbers seem very low. I don't think a dynojet is your solution. I'm assuming you are running LS6 "style" heads, not true LS6 heads correct? If they're real LS6 heads then I'd panic
Maybe you already covered this, but did you wideband the car on the dyno?
Old 05-03-2005, 10:45 PM
  #45  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
92SilverSHO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Bensalem, Pa, now montreal, Quebec
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

very low, something is up with that combo
Old 05-03-2005, 11:23 PM
  #46  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
AsianIce25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

yeah, i dont know whats wrong wither. i have a friend there with w2w ls1 ported heads and a bigger cam, 230+(not much bigger though), and he put down 404 on w2w's mustang dyno.

can you edit the knock tables so it stops throwing codes? i hate codes, it makes my car seem like a piece a **** with the check engine light always on. thats one of the main reasons i did the tune, so i dont have to look at that light anymore, its been on for lik 2 years, ever since i put the spray on and ruined a cat.

they did wideband the car, its running about 12.8:1 a/f and 28* timing at wot and 30* at 6800. i was told by kirk that that was the most timing he could do. so, im hoping this is just something to do with that mustang dyno. there are so many things you can do with those things, and maybe dan set it up wrong? id imagine that he knows what hes doing, but im hoping for higher numbers

i am going to livernois this sat for their open house, and im going to put this thing on the dynojet, and maybe their mustang dyno too. all im going to do before i go is change the oil. it just put a lil over 400 miles on it today since the cam, and im changing back to mobil one synthetic like i always use. i guess that prob give me a couple extra hp, but itll still be a good comparison.

how much power do you think low tire pressure will rob me? i think the wheels are low, like 20psi +/- 3 psi, cause i never filled em up after i went to the track last year in october, i just put the car away.

i have to admit that the car pulls hard, its like im in 2nd gear when im really in 3rd. i am going to go to milan (the track) soon, that will be a good jusdgement of how much power i am running, although i have a 300+pound stereo in the back that doesnt come out. one of the sponsors was saying he ran 11's on 350 mustang dyno hp, if i bust into the 11's, ill be happy even with that number. i doubt ill see 11's though. no traction. ill prob order some 315 nittos before i go though.

i keep on going through what it could possibly be, the problem that is. it could be the timing chain, but i know i set that up right, dot to dot, i checked it like 50 times and got other opinions too. plus if it was wrong, im sure id know it by now. so thats cool. timing set crappy, i know kirk set the timing at 28-30*, so thats cool. im running ngk tr6's gapped around .038, they seem fine. if i wasnt getting spark, it would run like ultra crap. true duals with bullet mufflers. edelbrock longtubes. everything should be cool. am i missing anything? what else should i check?
Old 05-04-2005, 12:06 AM
  #47  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (17)
 
leeluther252's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Kingwood, tx
Posts: 556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Tire pressure is a big factor.. I gained 12rwhp when i aired my tires up..
Old 05-04-2005, 12:08 AM
  #48  
Launching!
 
amwellls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Washington Pa
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

good luck, can not wait to see the difference in the numbers between the 2 dynos
Old 05-04-2005, 12:11 AM
  #49  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
AsianIce25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by leeluther252
Tire pressure is a big factor.. I gained 12rwhp when i aired my tires up..
damn, 12 rwhp, i prob shouldnt add air before the dynojett this sat, cause i want to know the real difference. but i will go synthetic, i already bought it and crap. anyway, anything else? i was also thinking about going to synthetic moll one atf in the tranny. good idea?
Old 05-04-2005, 09:11 AM
  #50  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (17)
 
leeluther252's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Kingwood, tx
Posts: 556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Make 2 pulls.. air the tires up and make another.. I did that at MTI and gaines 12 right then and there. It was on my 5th pull ... not that it matters
Old 05-04-2005, 03:15 PM
  #51  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
AsianIce25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

leeluther...i hope youre right, another 12 hp is a start. i think ill get a ported tb and maybe some harland sharp 1.7's, that shuld also help my numbers oiut. ill let you guys know, only a few more days till i get the new dyno numbers.
Old 05-04-2005, 03:40 PM
  #52  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (22)
 
WHPLASH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Macomb Michigan
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Do a Bo White t/b. Send him your t/b, less sensors and he'll have it back to you like 2-3 days later for $65.
Old 05-04-2005, 07:53 PM
  #53  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
ExceSSive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Gateway International Raceway
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Well I am sure you have heard this before...

1. Mustang dyno = lower dyno number
2. 4.10 gears = lower dyno number
3. low tire pressure= lower dyno number
4. 12.8 AF is that a good AFR for an N/A car? I know that with FI 11.5 or so is good, that just seems a little rich for N/A.

You have gotten some good advice in here, I wish you luck with what ever you try. Let us know the results.
Old 05-04-2005, 08:06 PM
  #54  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
AsianIce25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ExceSSive
Well I am sure you have heard this before...

1. Mustang dyno = lower dyno number
2. 4.10 gears = lower dyno number
3. low tire pressure= lower dyno number
4. 12.8 AF is that a good AFR for an N/A car? I know that with FI 11.5 or so is good, that just seems a little rich for N/A.

You have gotten some good advice in here, I wish you luck with what ever you try. Let us know the results.
agreed on all aspects except the af ratio. i think thats a good number thats safe, not like some who run over 13:1. im not sure if youre confused on this, but the higher the ratio the more lean youre running. 11.5 to 1 is real fat, but better safe than sorry. stoich being 14.7:1 under perfect conditions, which we dont have in the real world.
Old 05-04-2005, 09:13 PM
  #55  
On The Tree
 
Phoenix 2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: L.A
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You should go with the AFR 205cc heads...
Old 05-05-2005, 02:50 AM
  #56  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by AsianIce25
agreed on all aspects except the af ratio. i think thats a good number thats safe, not like some who run over 13:1. im not sure if youre confused on this, but the higher the ratio the more lean youre running. 11.5 to 1 is real fat, but better safe than sorry. stoich being 14.7:1 under perfect conditions, which we dont have in the real world.
11.5 is way too fat, I run 12.5 on nitrous and that is fat. no need to go from one extreem to the other. A rich motor will loose a lot of power. one time i went to 12.0 for a big shot and decided to do a NA run just to see and I lost .3 in the 1/4 or roughly ~25rwhp
Not to mention that over time carbon build up will foul everything from plugs to coating pistons, chambers, valves etc... making hot spots and giving you a lesson in KR from detonation and pre- ignition
Old 05-05-2005, 06:44 AM
  #57  
TECH Fanatic
 
SAM98WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: harrisburg, pa
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Check it on another dyno. You know you should be ~400rwhp with your combo..or something is wrong..or your parts suck...its simple. We are all trying to help you out. Then you have to troubleshoot...
Tuning?
Compression test?
Leakdown test?
Degree cam?
The list goes on...
Old 05-05-2005, 08:06 AM
  #58  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (8)
 
ninobrn99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Honolulu HI
Posts: 2,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AsianIce25
well, i gues i know what youre talkin about, i should go to the track, but i want more. i know the cam is kinda small, but i think it really need more lift and could use a bit more duration. what about a cam in the 240ish range and around .600 lift maybe on a 110 lsa or somehting? too big? i say screw it now, i want max power...
you should be putting down better numbers. there are alot of 224's putting down 393 or so cam only, then for you to add heads to the setup......410 should be easy to achieve. Maybe you could have a better tune??
Old 05-07-2005, 06:02 PM
  #59  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
AsianIce25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default new dyno numbers...

OK, here's the deal. if you didnt read this, ttt. and so i just got back from livernois open house, it was cool. there was a lot of cars there. i got there around 11 or so and didnt leave till 5ish. so i put down 351.5 rwhp @ 6300 rpm and323.3 rwtq @ 5000rpm on Wheel 2 Wheel's Mustang Dyno. today, where it was prob 1- degrees warmer and more humid, i put down 405.3 rwhp and 375.4rwtq. I AM A LOT HAPPIER WITH THESE NUMBERS. i thought there might be something wrong with my car, but it would seem that all is cool. i think ill still get a bigger cam next winter and throw it in there. maybe a 233/239 or bigger. i just want to make it streetable power and obviously, i want it to help my et at the track. ill prob try to go to the track next weekend and try to get some numbers. so this means the following as far as conversions...

Conversions/losses:

Mustang Dyno # * 1.153=dynojet numbers
-or
dynojet # * .867=mustang dyno numbers

so i gained 53.8 hp and 52.1 tq just by going to a dynojet. the only differences were about 100 miles and i changed my oil back to mobil one 10w/30 over the 5w/30 regular oil i had in it before. so maybe the synthetic gave me a couple ponies. all in all, im glad i made it over 400, but its messed up how dynos could be so far off.

at the open house, they had a 99+viper, and it only put down 390. there was also a 03 supercharged mustang that made 440 on the dynojet. it had an exhaust and a couple other mods. so i feel good about my 405. i should have some track times in the near future, but not for at least another week.
Old 05-07-2005, 06:04 PM
  #60  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
AsianIce25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

forgot to post the pics of the dynosheets. here they are...
Attached Thumbnails only 351.5 rwhp & 323.3 rwtq on 224/224 patriot ls6 head combo...why so low?-224-224-mustang-dyno-small.jpg   only 351.5 rwhp & 323.3 rwtq on 224/224 patriot ls6 head combo...why so low?-224-224-dynojet-dyno-small.jpg  


Quick Reply: only 351.5 rwhp & 323.3 rwtq on 224/224 patriot ls6 head combo...why so low?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:20 AM.