Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

cc of a 5.3 stock head

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-08-2005 | 08:38 PM
  #1  
John Junkins's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (137)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 797
Likes: 3
From: Keyser, West Virginia
Default cc of a 5.3 stock head

Can anyone tell me the cc of a stock 5.3 heads. Have my set of heads done and need the info. jwcej@msn.com
Thanks and God Bless Our Troops and the U.S., John Junkins
Old 05-08-2005 | 09:21 PM
  #2  
Richard@WCCH's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,853
Likes: 5
From: Van Nuys, CA
Default

They should cc at around 61cc in stock configuration.

Richard
Old 05-08-2005 | 09:25 PM
  #3  
John Junkins's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (137)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 797
Likes: 3
From: Keyser, West Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by Richard@WCCH
They should cc at around 61cc in stock configuration.

Richard
Richard, And that should put my motor around 11/1 compression on a stock displacement/ bore, correct? Or close to it. Thanks for the info.
Thanks again and God Bless Our Troops and the U.S., John Junkins
Old 05-08-2005 | 09:48 PM
  #4  
oange ss's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,234
Likes: 5
From: Texas
Default

11.04 with .054 gasket
Old 05-08-2005 | 10:11 PM
  #5  
BrentB@TEA's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
From: Chattanooga
Default

I wouldn't run a stock 5.3 head. I doubt it will make as much power as a stock 5.7 head
Old 05-08-2005 | 10:17 PM
  #6  
Bo White's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,357
Likes: 0
From: Vance, Alabama
Default

I agree, if they are not going to be ported youl be doin good gettin 10 rwhp.
Old 05-08-2005 | 11:24 PM
  #7  
Richard@WCCH's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,853
Likes: 5
From: Van Nuys, CA
Default

John, Brent and Bo are right. Don't run the 5.3l heads in stock form. The compression increase isn't worth the loss in flow with the smaller intake valves. Have the heads professionally prepped and then enjoy your hotrod. Otherwise stick with your LS1 heads.

Richard

Trending Topics

Old 05-09-2005 | 06:22 AM
  #8  
John Junkins's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (137)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 797
Likes: 3
From: Keyser, West Virginia
Default

Thanks Guys I'm having a set done as we speak. I bought a used set of Katech heads and was having them cleaned and checked. I was wondering how much was milled off them. They were 853 heads to start with. The machine shop said they check by cc the heads. I need to know what the 5.3 heads cc were to compare and to see how much if any needs milled off. THANKS AGAIN!!!! jwcej@msn.com
Thanks again and God Bless Our Troops and the U.S., John Junkins
Old 05-09-2005 | 08:02 AM
  #9  
BrentB@TEA's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
From: Chattanooga
Default

John the best way to check them is to measure the deck height to short bolt hole height. On a stock head it should be close to 1.6"
Most of them time the chamber is a few CC's larger after porting so if you really want to know how much is milled check the short bolt hole to deck.
Old 05-09-2005 | 08:29 AM
  #10  
blacktransam's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,414
Likes: 0
From: apoopka, fl
Default

umm look at the top of this forum.. ls1 cylindar head cc's..doesn't n e one search anymore??
Old 05-09-2005 | 06:57 PM
  #11  
John Junkins's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (137)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 797
Likes: 3
From: Keyser, West Virginia
Default

Thanks again for the help!!!!!
Thanks again and God Bless Our Troops and the U.S., John Junkins
Old 05-09-2005 | 07:14 PM
  #12  
transsam's Avatar
9 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 720
Likes: 3
From: San Diego - Gaslamp Quarter
Default

just measure it. Go to a drug store and buy a syringe(sp???). See how many MLs/CCs it takes to fill it up. There is your number. Be careful when it gets to the top as water will overfill on the sides. You will get within about 1cc with this method.
Old 05-10-2005 | 12:20 AM
  #13  
DanZ28's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,412
Likes: 0
From: Cali/Bay Area
Default

Originally Posted by BrentB@TEA
John the best way to check them is to measure the deck height to short bolt hole height. On a stock head it should be close to 1.6"
Most of them time the chamber is a few CC's larger after porting so if you really want to know how much is milled check the short bolt hole to deck.
Brent, is that 1.600" exact and the same for a 5.7L head? Out of curiosity I just measured mine at 1.579". I was supposed to have .035" shaved off the heads (not your heads), but only looks like .021" off. Definately throw my CR out of whack from what I thought it would be.

Dan
Old 07-18-2005 | 03:28 PM
  #14  
GTA91's Avatar
9 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,131
Likes: 1
From: St.Louis, Missouri
Default

Originally Posted by DanZ28
Brent, is that 1.600" exact and the same for a 5.7L head? Out of curiosity I just measured mine at 1.579". I was supposed to have .035" shaved off the heads (not your heads), but only looks like .021" off. Definately throw my CR out of whack from what I thought it would be.

Dan
Yeah, is that 1.600" exact and for 5.7 heads too? I need to check my '98 heads on my LS1. A friend worked them over but we can't remember if we milled them or not and I need to know for my pushrod length.


Thanks!
-Jeremy
Old 04-13-2006 | 04:44 PM
  #15  
GTA91's Avatar
9 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,131
Likes: 1
From: St.Louis, Missouri
Default

So is the 1.60" measurement correct for a 5.7L head or not??
Old 04-13-2006 | 07:27 PM
  #16  
John Junkins's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (137)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 797
Likes: 3
From: Keyser, West Virginia
Default

So is the 1.60" measurement correct for a 5.7L head or not??
GTA91, That is what I used to gauge my heads.
But I will check my old heads and get back to you.
John Junkins
Old 04-13-2006 | 08:39 PM
  #17  
GTA91's Avatar
9 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,131
Likes: 1
From: St.Louis, Missouri
Default

Let me know, thanks!!

*Also, I did the other measurement from the valve cover plane to the deck plane and it actually is parallel... I got about 7.4XX all over the place. I'm about 99.9999% sure my heads aren't milled.
Old 04-23-2006 | 11:12 AM
  #18  
John Junkins's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (137)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 797
Likes: 3
From: Keyser, West Virginia
Default

Let me know, thanks!!

*Also, I did the other measurement from the valve cover plane to the deck plane and it actually is parallel... I got about 7.4XX all over the place. I'm about 99.9999% sure my heads aren't milled.
Jeremy, I measured my old 853 heads and the short bolt side is 1.60" it was consistant on all bolts. Hope this help.
Thanks, have a great Sunday and God Bless Our Troops and the U.S.,
John Junkins
Old 04-23-2006 | 11:15 AM
  #19  
GTA91's Avatar
9 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,131
Likes: 1
From: St.Louis, Missouri
Default

Originally Posted by John Junkins
Originally Posted by GTA91
Let me know, thanks!!

*Also, I did the other measurement from the valve cover plane to the deck plane and it actually is parallel... I got about 7.4XX all over the place. I'm about 99.9999% sure my heads aren't milled.
Jeremy, I measured my old 853 heads and the short bolt side is 1.60" it was consistant on all bolts. Hope this help.
Thanks, have a great Sunday and God Bless Our Troops and the U.S.,
John Junkins
Thanks man, I'm pretty sure mine aren't milled then!!
Old 04-23-2006 | 11:35 AM
  #20  
John Junkins's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (137)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 797
Likes: 3
From: Keyser, West Virginia
Default

My new heads were milled .032 ths. I wanted to go with a bigger lift cam. But I'm going to be safe and use my 228R cam with .588 lift. Glad it helped.
John Junkins




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:58 AM.