Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

383,402,408,422,427, 441???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-27-2005, 04:27 PM
  #21  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
Beast96Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by FIREHAWK #07
overall which is better.... more stroke, or more bore????
Basically, the stroke will produce more TQ down low. Strokers are awesome street cars due to the TQ. The all bore will produce higher HP numbers in the upper RPM's. There better suited for drag racing where the car stays in the upper RPM's more. Basically.......
Old 05-27-2005, 06:34 PM
  #22  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (15)
 
DrkPhx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: St. Michael, MN.
Posts: 4,519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Beast96Z
Basically, the stroke will produce more TQ down low. Strokers are awesome street cars due to the TQ. The all bore will produce higher HP numbers in the upper RPM's. There better suited for drag racing where the car stays in the upper RPM's more. Basically.......
There is a good article in Hot Rod magazine where they actually try to disprove or prove this theory with different big block engine configurations on an engine dyno. Pretty interesting results. Check it out.
Old 05-27-2005, 07:36 PM
  #23  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
DNAST1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DNAST1
Can someone please explain to me whats makes a 402 a 402, 383, a 383 and so on!? Too many configurations
Thanks for all the replies So now I move on to the next question which will open up a can of worms which is I see the 402, and the 427 being the most popular..... is it worthy to assume these 2 combo are also the most reliable (as far as not pushing the block to the extreme?). My ultimate goal is the cheapest(again reliable), way attain 500 RWHP on a daily driver(C5 MN6).
Old 05-27-2005, 07:42 PM
  #24  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (15)
 
DrkPhx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: St. Michael, MN.
Posts: 4,519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Theoritically the 402 would be more reliable than the 427 because it is not a resleeved block and puts out killer power.
Old 05-27-2005, 08:44 PM
  #25  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
Beast96Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DrkPhx
Theoritically the 402 would be more reliable than the 427 because it is not a resleeved block and puts out killer power.
Exactlly. There are a few sponsors that have pumped 550 rwhp out of 402's. If they were avalible when I bought my motor, that's what I would have bought.
Old 05-27-2005, 09:31 PM
  #26  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
11 Bravo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 3,078
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Any of the motors will be plenty reliable if built right. I didn't see a 455 on the list. The bigger the better IMO.
Old 05-27-2005, 10:25 PM
  #27  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
Beast96Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 11 Bravo
Any of the motors will be plenty reliable if built right. I didn't see a 455 on the list. The bigger the better IMO.
I listed the 4.250 stroke as an option, but didn't actually draw out the package. Not to many people get that big because of the angle. The new Darton LS2 sleeves should be interesting to see how big you can get with the bore.......
Old 05-27-2005, 11:01 PM
  #28  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
11 Bravo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 3,078
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Beast96Z
I listed the 4.250 stroke as an option, but didn't actually draw out the package. Not to many people get that big because of the angle.
Yes, but the 455 has no real world issues that I know of. Of course there aren't too many out there. No replacement for displacement. Built right, it should be good to go. If I could do it all over again, that would be my choice.
Old 05-27-2005, 11:39 PM
  #29  
TECH Regular
 
Builder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Here's a great page from Cartek with all of the bore/stroke relationships...
Old 05-28-2005, 12:42 PM
  #30  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
Beast96Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 11 Bravo
Yes, but the 455 has no real world issues that I know of. Of course there aren't too many out there. No replacement for displacement. Built right, it should be good to go. If I could do it all over again, that would be my choice.
Which bore, stroke, and block would be your option to accomplish this? I almost had a 463 built for huge N/A power, but decided against it. I was gunna use a Callies/Darton block, Callies 4.250 stroke crank, and a 4.160 bore.
Old 05-28-2005, 03:36 PM
  #31  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
11 Bravo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 3,078
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Beast96Z
Which bore, stroke, and block would be your option to accomplish this? I almost had a 463 built for huge N/A power, but decided against it. I was gunna use a Callies/Darton block, Callies 4.250 stroke crank, and a 4.160 bore.
4.130 bore and a 4.25 crank. A 4.155 bore and 4.125 crank offset ground can get there as well. MTI is building 455's. I think they are keeping the specs secret But the one I saw posted made almost 550rwtq with almost 400 by 2000rpm's




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:17 PM.