Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Best low end torque cam for LS1..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-15-2005, 12:56 PM
  #221  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Felix C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 627
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Come on folks. Let it be. This was a damned good thread.

Not everyone wants to install gears. There is plenty of gear multiplication with a 3.42 rear and a M6.

Question is regarding the camshaft in question,-the one making 400/400--is it a fluke?

Last edited by Felix C; 08-15-2005 at 01:58 PM. Reason: grammar
Old 08-15-2005, 01:12 PM
  #222  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (12)
 
gojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: w.s.n.c.
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/238188-new-heads.html

Go here for an honest dyno graph. Terrific cam and it's for sale.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/lsx-parts-sale/364476-c5-parts-sale.html
Old 08-15-2005, 02:32 PM
  #223  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Ragtop 99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 9,491
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by 98A4LS1
I've narrowed my choices to the following 4 cams for a daily driver, keeping 3.23 gears with 3600 rpm stall TC 2.1 STR. Street driven only and trying not to lose to much low end grunt. Not after peak HP numbers, just wake up an already decent engine.
222/224 0.566/0.568 112
220/224 0.530/0.534 112
224/228 0.534/0.537 112
220/224 0.551/0.551 114
With an A4, you'll never be at WOT below the stall speed. Therefore torque below 3500 is not much of an issue.

Based upon your sig, it looks like you have stock manifolds and cats; so you need more help on the exhaust side and don't want a ton of overlap. Therefore, I like your last choice. I'd look at 220/228 115 +3 as another alternative.
Old 08-15-2005, 04:02 PM
  #224  
Race your car!
iTrader: (50)
 
JL ws-6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,420
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

You're 3rd cam choice is similar to the one that Eastside did for me.. you may wanan call them, I'm pretty sure that they have a couple in stock. Tell them Jason sent you... and you're looking for the cam that's in my car. You won't be dissappointed.
Old 08-15-2005, 04:11 PM
  #225  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
nuzee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ragtop 99
With an A4, you'll never be at WOT below the stall speed. Therefore torque below 3500 is not much of an issue.
You know, I was a firm believer in that thought. But from my recent track testing of a newly installed TCI3500 stall, I'm changing my mind a little bit. I am able to pull 1.61-1.63 60 fts and lift a front wheel. I'm thinking that at least part of the 60 ft improvement is due to my "stump-puller" cam.

Based on some info I logged during runs, there is a small portion of time when the car hasn't moved yet and the engine is flashing to stall speed (~3600-3700) that stump-pulling torque is shifting the car's weight from front to back quickly> which aids traction> which lowers 60 ft> yada yada yada. I don't know if this is a fact or not, its just one of my thoughts. BTW, I seem to get better 60s by flash stalling rather than stalling it up.
Old 08-15-2005, 04:41 PM
  #226  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Ragtop 99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 9,491
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Nuzee:

I agree that as that there is a brief instance when the car is just starting to roll when you are simultaneously releasing the brake and pressing the gas and the converter is flashing up from the brake-stall to the converter's stall. However, I don't know if you are actually at WOT since the TB is going from about 10% open to 100% and the manifold is filling during this instant in time. If you ever dyno an M6 and starting recording before going to WOT, you'll see that it takes a couple hundred rpm for the power to jump all the way up. The cam helps breathing during that instant in time, I'm just not sure by how much. In any event a cam that makes torque at 3500 will make ok torque at 3000 and be enough for that instant before full stall is reached.

In his case, I was just trying to point out that on the street, low end grunt does not exist with a an aftermarket stall. It's just about impossible to find yourself at more than 50% TPS and be at less than 3000 rpm. The stock A4 tables will call for a downshift and/or unlock the converter under those conditions.
Old 08-17-2005, 07:42 AM
  #227  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (14)
 
DAPSUPRSLO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Salisbury,MD
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Felix C
I think you need to know more regarding that dyno sheet. It could be through and Auto with the converter skewing the results. Depends whether it was locked or unlocked.
This was my car and it was a m6, no auto here or stalls to skew results.
Old 08-17-2005, 07:44 AM
  #228  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (14)
 
DAPSUPRSLO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Salisbury,MD
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Felix C
This is a great thread. The above referenced cam dyno is amazing. Has anyone seen similar torque numbers for a bolt on LS1? Presume stock heads. Too bad the owner of the car has not stepped forward.
Twas on stock heads, albeit 01 ls1 heads.
Old 08-17-2005, 08:00 AM
  #229  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Felix C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 627
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I know, well I know now. I did not know then.
Old 08-17-2005, 10:27 AM
  #230  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Spinmonster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 722
Received 61 Likes on 29 Posts

Default

Going to 3.73's will net quicker 1/4 times than any of the cams shown without headwork. It will pull harder in all gears.

It will also set the stage later for you to go to a real cam while maintaining driveability by getting you into your power band faster.

Every car I have has maximized gearing and that includes a 68 dart with 6.13 gears that pulls a freekin wheelie for a ridiculous distance down the 1/4. Build your car from the back to the front. Don't take advice from peple with near 12 second 1/4 times. Getting a bigger cam never loses TQ it just moves it higher in the power band and gearing puts you in that power band faster. Looking at a dyno sheet and saying well this cam has more TQ at 2000 rpm doesnt mean you lost or gained TQ with a cam change. You simply need gearing to put you at the RPM faster where the greater TQ is made.

Last edited by Spinmonster; 08-17-2005 at 10:46 AM.
Old 08-17-2005, 02:35 PM
  #231  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (14)
 
DAPSUPRSLO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Salisbury,MD
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Spinmonster
Going to 3.73's will net quicker 1/4 times than any of the cams shown without headwork. It will pull harder in all gears.

It will also set the stage later for you to go to a real cam while maintaining driveability by getting you into your power band faster.

Every car I have has maximized gearing and that includes a 68 dart with 6.13 gears that pulls a freekin wheelie for a ridiculous distance down the 1/4. Build your car from the back to the front. Don't take advice from peple with near 12 second 1/4 times. Getting a bigger cam never loses TQ it just moves it higher in the power band and gearing puts you in that power band faster. Looking at a dyno sheet and saying well this cam has more TQ at 2000 rpm doesnt mean you lost or gained TQ with a cam change. You simply need gearing to put you at the RPM faster where the greater TQ is made.
Absolutely, and being able to hold the gear out longer (hold first out longer, hold second out longer, etc. etc.) will always amount up to an advantage in the quarter unless your friction losses through the transmission, rear, etc. are sky high.
Old 08-17-2005, 03:31 PM
  #232  
11 Second Club
 
blkZ28spt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The South
Posts: 5,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by SUPRSLO
Absolutely, and being able to hold the gear out longer (hold first out longer, hold second out longer, etc. etc.) will always amount up to an advantage in the quarter unless your friction losses through the transmission, rear, etc. are sky high.
Do you realize that steeper gears mean you will spend LESS time in each gear?
Old 08-17-2005, 03:44 PM
  #233  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Ragtop 99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 9,491
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Spinmonster
Going to 3.73's will net quicker 1/4 times than any of the cams shown without headwork. It will pull harder in all gears.
Before you make that generalization to all A4's, you need to know what stall he has. It has been documented many times over, that if you have a bolt-on car with a 3500 or higher stall and switch from the factory 3.23s to 3.73s, the most you gain is .1 and 1 mph. Going to 4.10s adds another .05 improvement. The gain on the switch from 2.73s is a little better, but not as dramatic as you would expect.

You are correct about the gears if you have a stock stall. The switch to 3.73s are good for .2. - .3 depending upon which gear you switch from. However, if he has a stock stall, cam, and gears then a torque converter should be his first mod as that will net .5 or more. Then he can move on to a cam or gears.

Even with a mild cam like what he is considering, he will see at least .2 and 2 mph gain.

It will also set the stage later for you to go to a real cam while maintaining driveability by getting you into your power band faster.
I agree that the extra gearing works to your advantage by winding out the cam, but for an A4 it is the torque converter that makes the big difference. I also agree that gears can help the drivability in town of a modified car.
Old 08-17-2005, 06:55 PM
  #234  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (14)
 
DAPSUPRSLO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Salisbury,MD
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by blkZ28spt
Do you realize that steeper gears mean you will spend LESS time in each gear?
Yes, but you are also multiplying your power to a greater extent too by having more gear and a higher rpm band.
Old 08-17-2005, 07:49 PM
  #235  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Firehawk526's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,017
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

How'd I miss this thread, I'll never know, but took me 10 minutes to review the content.......and basically, I am seeking the same 226-230 range cam set-up w/62--6400 rpm range, with my M6 I don't need anymore torque. I need power in the higher RPM range. Once I install the 4.10/9" w/locker, I shouldn't have a torque/launching issue I wouldn't think.

Question: Should you always strive for a balance between hp and tq (proportional ratio)?

DYNO'd 334 rwhlhp 389 enghp
353 rwhltq 403 engtq

When I run, it seems I don't have the ooomph down the strip!

I do have a 224/224 .050 lift 110 lobe sep/106 intake centerline READY for install, but I thought it may be the wrong cam for my application. Several ppl have told me that it would serve an A4 w/stall very well, but not for an M6
Old 08-17-2005, 07:56 PM
  #236  
Staging Lane
 
SauronWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Firehawk526
I do have a 224/224 .050 lift 110 lobe sep/106 intake centerline READY for install, but I thought it may be the wrong cam for my application. Several ppl have told me that it would serve an A4 w/stall very well, but not for an M6

What's the lift?
Old 08-17-2005, 08:00 PM
  #237  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Firehawk526's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,017
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Dap.....you wanna answer that Q? Ironically, it's DapSuperslo's cam!

A couple of non-EFA locals said the centerline should be more like 112-114 for my application, but as I indicated earlier I have much learning to do before the decision is made.......want to keep the car w/good street manners, but have the powerband when required.
Old 08-17-2005, 08:03 PM
  #238  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (14)
 
DAPSUPRSLO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Salisbury,MD
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Firehawk526
Dap.....you wanna answer that Q?
The lift is .568". One way to help the cam up top would be to add 1.8 rockers and or install and adjustable timing chain for retarding the cam.


BTW, I am SUPRSLO and DAPSUPRSLO. My stuff is messed up.
Old 08-17-2005, 08:08 PM
  #239  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Firehawk526's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,017
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by DAPSUPRSLO
The lift is .568". One way to help the cam up top would be to add 1.8 rockers and or install and adjustable timing chain for retarding the cam.


BTW, I am SUPRSLO and DAPSUPRSLO. My stuff is messed up.
Don't wanna really change the rocker set-up. Just a quick swap out of pulley (ASP), 918 springs, titanium retainers, and 7.4 pushrods. This will do me until the engine wears out, and then we'll be STROKIN' w/ diff head combo.

I am not gonna sweat 10hp if it means losing 1-2 mpg.
Old 08-17-2005, 09:15 PM
  #240  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Firehawk526's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,017
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by DAPSUPRSLO
The lift is .568". One way to help the cam up top would be to add 1.8 rockers and or install and adjustable timing chain for retarding the cam.


BTW, I am SUPRSLO and DAPSUPRSLO. My stuff is messed up.
OK, Hero.....fix dat name!


Quick Reply: Best low end torque cam for LS1..



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:03 PM.