Why did my Z06 dyno so low? Lots of mods, low numbers
#101
10 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: HTOWN
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Shawn MacAnanny
The LS6 intake is not the reason my car is only making 410rwhp. There has got to be something wrong in the tune and other little things.
Also i have a race lined up with an R6. Think i can beat him? Lol.
Also i have a race lined up with an R6. Think i can beat him? Lol.
Matt
#102
With all the back & forth in the responses here, I'd bet your head is spinning. IMHO, work the problem out w/ the guy you got the parts from.
-Head should be matched to cam regardless
-LS6 intake flows plenty just need to unrestrict the inlet by going to a larger TB, ported MAF, & a filter that is flow rated over 1000CFM. There are ported 78mm TB's that flow better than the BBS 80mm on e-bay for less than $200.00. You get another $60.00 off if you trade yours in. This could be an inexpensive way to increase the intake flow & increase engine VE.
-tune to 13:1 A/F ratio as has been mentioned.
So, you have your guy work w/ the cam manufacturer to better match the cam to the head, increase engine VE by modifying the the TB, MAF, & filter, re-tune & you're done. Other way is to spend the money to modify the head, etc., etc., etc..
Bigger injectors & high flow fuel pump would be a good idea.
-Head should be matched to cam regardless
-LS6 intake flows plenty just need to unrestrict the inlet by going to a larger TB, ported MAF, & a filter that is flow rated over 1000CFM. There are ported 78mm TB's that flow better than the BBS 80mm on e-bay for less than $200.00. You get another $60.00 off if you trade yours in. This could be an inexpensive way to increase the intake flow & increase engine VE.
-tune to 13:1 A/F ratio as has been mentioned.
So, you have your guy work w/ the cam manufacturer to better match the cam to the head, increase engine VE by modifying the the TB, MAF, & filter, re-tune & you're done. Other way is to spend the money to modify the head, etc., etc., etc..
Bigger injectors & high flow fuel pump would be a good idea.
#103
Yeah the injectors i might purchase as well. Some 42.5lbers. The fuel pump i was going to upgrade when i did the nitrous setup. Fran says he is going to port the TB. Should i descreen the MAF? From what i hear only the 01 Z06s had screens in their MAFs.
You dont think the Vararam is a good filter? I have the 2nd gen one with the better filter supposedly. I like the idead of semi-ram air at top end.
You dont think the Vararam is a good filter? I have the 2nd gen one with the better filter supposedly. I like the idead of semi-ram air at top end.
#104
Originally Posted by Shawn MacAnanny
Yeah the injectors i might purchase as well. Some 42.5lbers. The fuel pump i was going to upgrade when i did the nitrous setup. Fran says he is going to port the TB. Should i descreen the MAF? From what i hear only the 01 Z06s had screens in their MAFs.
You dont think the Vararam is a good filter? I have the 2nd gen one with the better filter supposedly. I like the idead of semi-ram air at top end.
You dont think the Vararam is a good filter? I have the 2nd gen one with the better filter supposedly. I like the idead of semi-ram air at top end.
I don't know the spec's. for the Vararam filter. I was commenting about filters in general. Just check with them on the flow rate. In most cases, (not all cases) the manufaturer will design for 28 in. of water pressure drop across their unit whether it be a filter, MAF, intake tubing...etc.. The pressure drop that I have found to provide the best air flow into the intake is 10 in. of water or less. For this reason, I have suggested that your filter be sized for over 1,000 CFM (1,200 +) is even better. Keep in mind that the filter should be sized based on a normal intake vacuum condition, not only for the times you're @ speed forcing air through.
Can't comment on de-screening the MAF as I have heard pro's & con's, but, haven't experience with de-screening. Will say that often times a MAF can be the cause of restriction on high HP engines. Would do what can be done without consequence to increase flow through the MAF. Good-luck!
#105
TECH Junkie
Join Date: May 2003
Location: its fucking cold
Posts: 3,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Race against an R6....realistically it will take a little over 500 rwhp to beat a very well ridden 600cc (the modern...2003 and new....ones). However, very few bikes are ridden to their fullest potential, even in a straight line. Take the race up to 150mph (not somehting i condone) and you should win.
back on topic.
You will see a noticeable increase in power from a 90/90 combo. The LS6 intake begins to choke flow in the higher RPM's, and with those heads and big cam you need all the flow you can get up there. I strongly believe that a 90/90 will get you a significant gain. Milling the heads for some added compression will also do wonders. Something else....take the car to the track and see how it runs. Just because it dyno's low doesn't mean it's a dog. I wouldn't mess with the MAF personally, i've personally seen a completely stock car run like complete **** from a descreened MAF. If you still can't find the power you are looking for with the above reccomendations i would look into having a custom cam ground. Good luck man.
back on topic.
You will see a noticeable increase in power from a 90/90 combo. The LS6 intake begins to choke flow in the higher RPM's, and with those heads and big cam you need all the flow you can get up there. I strongly believe that a 90/90 will get you a significant gain. Milling the heads for some added compression will also do wonders. Something else....take the car to the track and see how it runs. Just because it dyno's low doesn't mean it's a dog. I wouldn't mess with the MAF personally, i've personally seen a completely stock car run like complete **** from a descreened MAF. If you still can't find the power you are looking for with the above reccomendations i would look into having a custom cam ground. Good luck man.
#106
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: FORT WALTON BEACH
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok guys read my post. I said AFRs are better street heads. And there is no such thing as too much velocity. The goal is to achieve the highest velocity while still supplying the cylinder with as much air as it wants. The bigger is better is huge on this post. Look at the comparison. 205cc chambers 290cfm. this will be a better head for a 346 ON THE STREET. now your head SHOULD make more peak hp. "should". But the area under the curve, will suck compared to the afrs. This is fact. More velocity more response more torque = more hp under the curve. Horse power is Tq x rpm / 5252 = hp. Look at anybodys site. AFR 225s are not recomended on stock cubes. Too much port and not enough cylinder volume. added that you have 2.055 valves you could be shrouding it.
#107
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: FORT WALTON BEACH
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
An ls6 intake is not the reason for the low numbers. I would say you have too much head for a 346, your headers are to big, (look in hot rod they lost power with 1 7/8th headers on stock cubes) and with low velocity due to stock cubes and big runners, your cam is hurting you. I agree with the exhaust duration hurting as well. I feel this is a miss matched combo. Others will prove me wrong. Im trying to help. I Am making 35+hp and 40+tq more than you with a small cam and as im hearing, CRAP AFR heads. (awesome heads) My cam is 224 224 112 567!!! 567!!! so its tiny, my headers are 1 3/4 my throttle body is stock my maf is stock, and Its an ls6 intake.
#110
Well we're going to desensitize knock and lean it out the next time it's tuned. We didnt monitor knock and its only 30 degrees of timing advance from 6200-6800 rpm the rest is all at 28 degrees. We are also installing 42.5lb injectors, getting an alignment, porting the TB, and pumping the tires up to 30psi and we'll see where that puts us.
#111
Originally Posted by Shawn MacAnanny
Well we're going to desensitize knock and lean it out the next time it's tuned. We didnt monitor knock and its only 30 degrees of timing advance from 6200-6800 rpm the rest is all at 28 degrees.....
If you are not getting any KR why are you desensitizing the knock sensors??? You mean you DID get knock, right???
#117
11 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ogden, Utah
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
lol well add another "cool board member" to the list hehe im 19 years old and pay 100% of my 02 Z06, i ordered my 408 iron shortblock from HPE last tuesday! i highly recommend them to you, just pay the extra money and do it right, im looking for 520 RWHP NA, they put down 479 through an automatic the other day with their "super E" cam...
anyways, good luck man, i hope you get this figured out and get up and running with good numbers!!
anyways, good luck man, i hope you get this figured out and get up and running with good numbers!!
#119
Originally Posted by Chuck@HPE
I've got LS1 headed cars making 430+ cam only with that cam peaking around 6400-6500 rpm.
Chuck
Chuck
I think you didn't boost the CR because that cam wouldn't fit and you didn't want to notch the pistons. As for getting 430 to the wheels with that cam on other cars, I could get 430 with that motor stock and a LG cam, headers, and UD everytime. For the record, I got 441 to the wheels with a 224/230 xer cam off the shelf from comp cams in essentially the same motor you put this monster in. My HP peaked around there too so you have something very wrong if your dyno sheet is showing a peak at 6400-6500 with that cam.