A Mild Cam With A Non Aggressive Ramp Rate?
Thread Starter
Launching!
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
How would these compare in terms of idle quality and drivabilty. Power & torque. Also which would put the most stress on the valvetrain?
Spend Inc. 1 222/222 .563./.563 @ 114
Comp Cams 212/218 .558/.563 @ 115
TR220 220/220 .553/.553 @ 114
Spend Inc. 1 222/222 .563./.563 @ 114
Comp Cams 212/218 .558/.563 @ 115
TR220 220/220 .553/.553 @ 114
TECH Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 17
From: BFE
Quote:
How would these compare in terms of idle quality and drivabilty. Power & torque. Also which would put the most stress on the valvetrain?
Spend Inc. 1 222/222 .563./.563 @ 114
Comp Cams 212/218 .558/.563 @ 115
TR220 220/220 .553/.553 @ 114[/quote]
These are very similar cams.
Powerwise with good tuning, the 222 should squeeze 5 more rwhp out than the TR220.
In a GTO I wouldn't put anything smaller than 224.
Something like 224/224, .581/.581 115. That will pass emissions and get you closer to 380+ rwhp
The ramp rate will make it easier to drive and deliver the power when you need it. It being a non split helps in tuning also.
How would these compare in terms of idle quality and drivabilty. Power & torque. Also which would put the most stress on the valvetrain?
Spend Inc. 1 222/222 .563./.563 @ 114
Comp Cams 212/218 .558/.563 @ 115
TR220 220/220 .553/.553 @ 114[/quote]
Anyone else?
Powerwise with good tuning, the 222 should squeeze 5 more rwhp out than the TR220.
In a GTO I wouldn't put anything smaller than 224.
Something like 224/224, .581/.581 115. That will pass emissions and get you closer to 380+ rwhp
The ramp rate will make it easier to drive and deliver the power when you need it. It being a non split helps in tuning also.
