A Mild Cam With A Non Aggressive Ramp Rate?
Crane 1449561 Adv. Dur.276/286 Dur@.050:216/224 .551/.551 LSA:115
Speed Inc. 1 Dur@.050:222/222 .563/.563 LSA:114
Comp Cams Dur@.050:216/220 .525/.532 LSA:114
Comp Cams Dur@.050:218/224 .527/.534 LSA:114
Last edited by LS1 PONTIAC GTO; Oct 29, 2005 at 04:41 PM.
The Lunati cam is similar to the old MTI Hammer cam IIRC
Both are good cams but not really mild.
A good old timer is the Comp 216/220, .525/.532 114+4
Both are good cams but not really mild.
A good old timer is the Comp 216/220, .525/.532 114+4
Not a cheap setup, but worth it and very street friendly.
The only thing left to fully enjoy is a High Stall (I recommend VIG 3200)
Vinci has a sound file of that cam on their web site if you are interested.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
207/220, .573/.580, 118.5 CL
Have you been to LS1sounds.com and listened to any of the cams out there?
TR's total lift is less than an XE-R, but the cam is similar to an XE-R from .006 - .200 so I would consider that aggressive. It helped make the TR 224 so drivable at time when tuning was fairly primitive.
If you are keeping the cats and going to tune it, I would vote for the 218/224 114.
Vettenuts: I'm not sure why Vinci was having problems with the smog police. A TR 224/224 114 has passed emmissions in many states. It does have faster ramps, so overlap at .006 is more like a 222/222 XE lobe cam. A 218/224 114 on the slower ramps will have maybe a hair more overlap at .006 than the TR 224 114. A good tune should deal with it. For an abundance of caution, an alternative would be to use a 115 LSA or go to 216/224 114.
This would be my pick. With a good set of heads this cam has made 400 RWHP.
I'm running the TR220 - 114 and love it. My car doesn't sound like a sewing machine. I get some valvetrain noise from 2000 - 2200 rpm but its not bad.
Last edited by equandt; Sep 6, 2005 at 12:41 PM.


