Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

233/276@.050 Why GM?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-30-2005, 05:45 PM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
gollum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default 233/276@.050 Why GM?

Why does GM use extreme split profile cams for the LS7? Aftermarket cam grinders use much less split.

Stock LS7 cam duration @.050 211/230

New GM HOT CAM stage 2 : @.050 227/239

New GM HOT CAM stage 3 : @.050 233/276
Old 12-30-2005, 05:59 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (31)
 
Pwebbz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denton, Tx
Posts: 1,248
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

My guess is to help overcome restrictive exhaust as compared to headers.
Old 12-30-2005, 06:54 PM
  #3  
LS1 Tech Administrator
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,244
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

That Stage 3 looks like a misprint. 276 @ .050" has no hope of clearing the pistons, unless they have HUGE valve reliefs.
__________________

2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2018 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 Pat G tuned.
LS1,LS2,LS3,LS7,LT1 Custom Camshaft Specialist For custom camshaft help press here.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
Old 12-30-2005, 06:58 PM
  #4  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
RaNsOm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Upper Marlboro, MD
Posts: 1,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Patrick G
That Stage 3 looks like a misprint. 276 @ .050" has no hope of clearing the pistons, unless they have HUGE valve reliefs.
yeah they were probably using the NUMPAD and hit 7 instead of 4.
4 would make much more sense.

227/239
233/246
Old 12-30-2005, 07:02 PM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
gollum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Pwebbz28
My guess is to help overcome restrictive exhaust as compared to headers.
The above quote was my first guess also, but I believe there is more reason behind GM's extreme split profile cam decision.

It (large split) simply makes more power while using headers/mufflers or open exhaust in the LS7 or LS1 motor.
Old 12-30-2005, 07:04 PM
  #6  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
ls2 bait's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: in your closet
Posts: 4,508
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

where did these specs come from? i didnt know gm made 3 versions of the hot cam.
Old 12-30-2005, 07:16 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
gollum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Patrick G
That Stage 3 looks like a misprint. 276 @ .050" has no hope of clearing the pistons, unless they have HUGE valve reliefs.


Timing per HOT ROD mag @.050-inch lift(degrees)

Intake: opens 6 atdc / closes 47 abdc = total 233@.050
Exhaust: opens 63 bbdc / closes 33 btdc = total 276@.050
Old 12-30-2005, 07:25 PM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
gollum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ls2 bait
where did these specs come from? i didnt know gm made 3 versions of the hot cam.
February 2006 HOT ROD magazine.
Old 12-30-2005, 07:28 PM
  #9  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (9)
 
ChucksZ06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 976
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I do not know if it is a misprint either. The pistons do have pretty healthy valve reliefs. They did change out the retainer in that test to get more installed height from the stock springs because of the high lift of the cam. I took it that these cams are newly developed cams...just using the same name? If you look at the exhaust flow figures in the Hot Rod article it makes you believe that the intake/exhaust ratio is very heavy towards the intake side...so that part would fit in with the extreme difference in exhaust duration. I bet it has to do with emissions.
Old 12-30-2005, 07:52 PM
  #10  
TECH Resident
 
DavidNJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 881
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

If you look at the valve events instead of duration it all makes sense.

The EVO is where it should be (remember the 115 deg CL. The IVC is where it should be. Remember the 123 deg CL.

What happened is they smashed the overlap. Look how late the intake opens. Its like a cam 10 degrees smaller than it should be.

The answer is probably emissions.
Old 12-31-2005, 06:21 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
gollum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DavidNJ
If you look at the valve events instead of duration it all makes sense.

The EVO is where it should be (remember the 115 deg CL. The IVC is where it should be. Remember the 123 deg CL.

What happened is they smashed the overlap. Look how late the intake opens. Its like a cam 10 degrees smaller than it should be.

The answer is probably emissions.
Another reason would be "better driveability" and "easier to tune" using stock LS7 MAF.

I bet a cam ground to stage 2 specs would be awsome in a higher compression 347 LS1.



Quick Reply: 233/276@.050 Why GM?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:54 PM.