BLACKBIRD8200

I'm just wondering why everybody compare's the torquer 2 to the fm-13 and not the fm 14???
is there something i don't know?

the specs of the torquer match the fm-14 better then the fm-13

Torquer V.2 - 232/234 595/598 -112

FM-14 - 232/234 598/598 - 112

FM-13 - 230/232 598/585 - 112

i'm not trying to down talk any of the cams, i'm trying to learn.

cyphur

iTrader: (10)

the F13 is generally a more popular cam, and its well known for its great drivability and great power. i can't speak for the Torquer, but the F13's cam profile changes a good bit from .050. Also - the F13 makes just about as much power as the F14(sometimes more) and behaves better.

can't just look @ .050, also have to take into account lobe profiles and the rest of the cam profile.

WS6FirebirdTA00

iTrader: (33)

what he said, the f13 cam is capable of making upper 400's hp at the wheels with the right bolt ons, heads and compression. i am going to try to get in the 470 range within the year hopefully with this cam and the stock 346

TRU-2GM

iTrader: (6)

Ive got the FM14 on my car and loving it! daily driver car with a 4200 stall

GuitsBoy

iTrader: (4)

F13 = loads of torque. Drives like stock once you get the part throttle timing correct...

Up top it pulls like a monster.

cyphur

iTrader: (10)

I have the F13 on a 112+0 and it doesn't feel like it lost anything down low, but it does pull like a bitch all the way up there. I don't have it fully tuned(motor break-in) - but the drivability isn't bad at all except in parking lots, and thats easy to drive around. When I get the full tune in I highly doubt I'll even have that issue - and even more power.