G5X1 vs. 228R
#1
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Stillwater, OK
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I have done tons of research and think I found two final possible cams. I dd my car m6 mods in sig. Dont want to go much over 6500 rpm since it is street car. I have seen some about the 224/228 but only SUTTERERMAN85 witht the G5X1. Anyone else have input on the two? Car will stay cam only maybe few suspension mods after for traction. Heard good things about 224/228 but not sure if it help a little to go bigger. I will probably get cam on 112+2 lsa. I would appreciate any comments on either. ![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
edit: more research= between 224/228 .581/.588 112+1 lsa or G5X1 228/232 .588/.574 112+2 lsa
![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
edit: more research= between 224/228 .581/.588 112+1 lsa or G5X1 228/232 .588/.574 112+2 lsa
![Icon Confused](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/icon_confused.gif)
Last edited by okls1; 04-27-2006 at 01:29 AM.
Trending Topics
#8
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Stillwater, OK
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
seems like a good cam, should work decent with the stock tune. you could wake it up a little more with some tuning tho.
#12
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Stillwater, OK
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
My Friend Is Running A G5x1 W/heads, And Full Bolt Ons And Is Only Putting 408 To The Wheels. The Cam Is Nasty, But You Can Do Better.
![Bang Head](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_banghead.gif)
#13
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
FWIW, I run the 224/228 0.588 112+0 in an automatic with no problems and from personal experience, you could go a little bigger like the 228/232 you mentioned even if a daily driver.
#14
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by TXZ28LS1
wouldnt the g5x1 make slightly a little more power because it has more exhaust than the 228? im curious also, cuz ive been doing some research on the MTI G1 cam which is pretty much close to the G5X1..
Bruce
#17
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Stillwater, OK
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I like the sounds of that IVO=6 IVC=42 EVO=48 EVC=4 ECL=112 Overlap=10 So predator you think the 110+2 would be ok for a dd street car? I was told by a tuner that it would be too peaky and not a broad enough torque curve. That cam does sound good though and 10 deg overlap with the true duals
![Devil](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_devil.gif)
#18
10 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
back in 02 I swapped in a set of ARE stage 3 heads with there custom grind at the time in 2002(224/228 581/588 on a 110 LSA) back then with a set of SLP headers and a stock 3" firehawk catback with a 12bolt rear and a steel Denny's nitrous ready driveshaft the car made 426rwhp. I have since then added a 3" X-pipe to dual bullets,a set of stepped kooks ,and a ported Fast 90/90. I'm over 450rwhp now but think I would gain a lot with a bigger cam. In 2002 this was a hot cam but I have out grown it. This is a great street cam and has served me well at the track but if my latest changes don't get me a 10 second NA timeslip I will have a cam for sale. My car since the H&C has been a track only trailer queen so there's less than 1,500 miles on this setup
#19
TECH Senior Member
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by okls1
I like the sounds of that IVO=6 IVC=42 EVO=48 EVC=4 ECL=112 Overlap=10 So predator you think the 110+2 would be ok for a dd street car? I was told by a tuner that it would be too peaky and not a broad enough torque curve. That cam does sound good though and 10 deg overlap with the true duals ![Devil](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_devil.gif)
![Devil](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_devil.gif)
You're talking minute effects.
Would be easier to tune SD though
#20
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Stillwater, OK
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Ok wow I just thought lower lsa would be worse for dd car? And would the 12* beat the hell out of the valvetrain, I would probably run prc duals, but dont want to change more then every 20k. I am thinking 228/232 be ok for street and I got 4.10s so what the hell, but guess I'm still not sure on the lsa as I have heard different things such as 110lsa would be hell on the street
Thanks for the help
edit: 110+1 would have same IVO and EVC just at 5 and an IVC of 43, 10* overlap?
![Icon Confused](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/icon_confused.gif)
edit: 110+1 would have same IVO and EVC just at 5 and an IVC of 43, 10* overlap?